When is the atypical design not penalized? Moderating role of product innovativeness and technological sophistication in consumer’s evaluation of new products

The purpose of this paper is to examine the individual and joint effects of the two design dimensions, form design and functional design, and moderating role of product innovativeness and technological sophistication in consumer’s evaluation of new products. Employing theoretical underpinnings from categorization theory, this paper investigates two major research questions. First, what type of form is more advantageous for a radically new product or an incrementally new product? Second, is there an individual difference in consumer evaluations to innovative products with various form designs?,One pre-test and three between-subject experiments were performed. In Experiments 1 and 2, a two-way between-group ANOVA analysis was performed to examine the effect of form and the degree of technological innovation on attitude toward the product using different product categories (car and camera). In Experiment 3, a three-way between-group ANOVA analysis was performed to explore the impact of form, the degree of technological innovation and consumer technological sophistication on attitude toward the product.,The results from the three experiments conducted demonstrate that, first, whereas the form design for incremental innovations must be closer to the incumbent products for favorable evaluations, less typical form is evaluated as good as a more typical form for radical innovations. Second, form design of an innovative product matters more to the technologically more sophisticated consumers (experts).,This paper extends the previous design literature and fills the gap of under-researched area by demonstrating that individual difference, technological sophistication, moderates the design effect on consumer evaluation of innovation; providing boundary condition of when the atypical form is not penalized in spite of consumer’s perceived learning cost; examining how the form and function interplay in “high-status product”; and demonstrating how to strengthen the reliability and validity by replicating the study. Managerially, this paper demonstrates that innovating firms can influence the perceived value of new products using form and functionality, and marketing managers who launch really new products have strategic freedom of choosing own product design.

[1]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  Country of Origin as a Stereotype: Effects of Consumer Expertise and Attribute Strength on Product Evaluations , 1994 .

[2]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage , 1989 .

[3]  A. Markman,et al.  “What Is It?” Categorization Flexibility and Consumers' Responses to Really New Products , 2001 .

[4]  Marina Candi,et al.  Consumer responses to functional, aesthetic and symbolic product design in online reviews , 2017 .

[5]  Tripat Gill,et al.  Convergent Products: What Functionalities Add More Value to the Base? , 2008 .

[6]  P. Chrysochou,et al.  The impact of product innovation attributes on brand equity , 2015 .

[7]  Christian Homburg,et al.  New Product Design: Concept, Measurement, and Consequences , 2015 .

[8]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  Nation Equity: Incidental Emotions in Country-of-Origin Effects , 2006 .

[9]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[10]  D. Dahl,et al.  Seeking the Ideal Level of Design Newness: Consumer Response to Radical and Incremental Product Design , 2013 .

[11]  K. Scott Swan,et al.  Perspective: A Review of Marketing Research on Product Design with Directions for Future Research , 2016 .

[12]  Antoaneta P. Petkova,et al.  When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[13]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[14]  A. Mishra.  Attribute-based design perceptions and consumer-brand relationship: Role of user expertise , 2016 .

[15]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  Executive influence on invention and commercialization: The moderating role of innovation radicalness , 2017 .

[16]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs , 1998 .

[17]  James J. Kellaris,et al.  An exploratory investigation of responses elicited by music varying in tempo, tonality, and texture , 1993 .

[18]  Peter H. Bloch.  Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response , 1995 .

[19]  César Camisón,et al.  Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size , 2016 .

[20]  Sangwon Lee.  The Impact of Form and Functional Design on New Product Evaluations: A Case of South Korean Women , 2013 .

[21]  R. Peterson,et al.  Convenience samples of college students and research reproducibility , 2014 .

[22]  Halimahtun M. Khalid,et al.  A framework for affective customer needs in product design , 2004 .

[23]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Consumer Learning by Analogy: A Model of Internal Knowledge Transfer , 1997 .

[24]  F. Pons,et al.  Values and adoption of innovations: a cross‐cultural study , 1999 .

[25]  B. Loken,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality , 1990 .

[26]  Brigitte Borja de Mozota,et al.  The Impact of User‐Oriented Design on New Product Development: An Examination of Fundamental Relationships* , 2005 .

[27]  A. Markman,et al.  Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products , 2001 .

[28]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  Satisfaction Strength and Customer Loyalty , 2007 .

[29]  Gaia Rubera,et al.  Design Innovativeness and Product Sales' Evolution , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[30]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[31]  Kumar R. Sarangee,et al.  Designed to Succeed: Dimensions of Product Design and Their Impact on Market Share , 2016 .

[32]  Zachary Johnson,et al.  The effect of new product design and innovation on South Korean consumer’s willingness to buy , 2017 .

[33]  Patrick Bonhoure,et al.  User pleasure in product concept prospecting , 2004 .

[34]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Premarket Forecasting of Really-New Products , 1996 .

[35]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Form versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences , 2007 .

[36]  Vanessa M. Patrick,et al.  The Positivity Effect in Perceptions of Services: Seen One, Seen Them All? , 2003 .

[37]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[38]  P. Herr,et al.  An Investigation of the Processes by Which Product Design and Brand Strength Interact to Determine Initial Affect and Quality Judgments , 2002 .

[39]  Peter C. Verhoef,et al.  Expanding Business-to-Business Customer Relationships: Modeling the Customer's Upgrade Decision , 2008 .

[40]  Steve Hoeffler,et al.  Measuring Preferences for Really New Products , 2003 .

[41]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic versus Utilitarian Benefits , 2008 .

[42]  A. d’Astous,et al.  The impact of technological complexity on consumers’ perceptions of products made in highly and newly industrialised countries , 2002 .

[43]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products , 1998 .

[44]  J. Joško Brakus,et al.  Adoption of New and Really New Products: The Effects of Self-Regulation Systems and Risk Salience , 2007 .

[45]  Rajani Ganesh Pillai,et al.  More to Form Than Meets the Eye? the Impact of Form and Functional Design on Attitude towards New Products , 2013 .

[46]  Bernard L. Simonin,et al.  Is a Company Known by the Company it Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes , 1998 .