Health Impact Assessments, Regulation, and the Unconventional Gas Industry in the UK: Exploiting Resources, Ideology, and Expertise?

Health impact assessments (HIAs) across the globe may be used by governments and industries to secure approval for unconventional gas extraction developments. HIA is an umbrella term that covers an array of health review and assessment practices, ranging from the very general to quite specific and technical health studies. Our concern in this paper is principally with the specialist end of the HIA continuum and particularly its application to unconventional gas extraction in the UK. We outline the context within which HIAs in unconventional gas extraction may be conducted. We then explain what HIAs may do. HIAs are often commissioned from consultancy companies to assess unconventional gas extraction project risks and benefits and propose mitigation measures. Communities can rarely afford HIAs in the planning process and may consider them biased when commissioned by vested interests. The oil and gas industry uses these techniques for its own ends. Hiring experts, be they specialist consultants, researchers, lobbyists, ex-government officials, or regulators, to influence planning and regulation is a well-tried tactic and structural advantage exploited by industry in seeking license to operate. Equitable and ethical HIA principles are urgently needed in the UK in relation to unconventional gas to secure the integrity and probity of the emerging regulatory system and address concerns regarding unregulated practitioners.

[1]  E M Faustman,et al.  Comparative Risk and Policy Analysis in Environmental Health , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Dr. Yulia Maleta,et al.  Playing with fire , 2009 .

[3]  D. Tuller.  As Fracking Booms, Dearth Of Health Risk Data Remains. , 2015, Health affairs.

[4]  Joanne Hawkins.  Fracking Minding the gaps , 2015 .

[5]  Wynands.  Pro and con , 1991 .

[6]  Michael Ryan.  Trust Us, We're Experts! How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future , 2002 .

[7]  David Miller,et al.  Resisting meaningful action on climate change:Think tanks, 'merchants of doubt' and the 'corporate capture' of sustainable development , 2015 .

[8]  Rajiv Bhatia,et al.  Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[9]  Katherine E Konschnik,et al.  Shale gas development: a smart regulation framework. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  M. Boisot,et al.  Working the System , 2011 .

[11]  Lin Fritschi,et al.  Leukemia Risk Associated With Low-Level Benzene Exposure , 2003, Epidemiology.

[12]  M Joffe,et al.  HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[13]  M. Depledge,et al.  Fracking Cannot Be Reconciled with Climate Change Mitigation Policies. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  L. Giudice,et al.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. , 2009, Endocrine reviews.

[15]  K. Ignagni,et al.  Playing with fire. , 2013, The Health service journal.

[16]  M. Douglas,et al.  Can health feasibly be considered as part of the planning process in Scotland , 2005 .

[17]  Miriam R. Aczel.  To frack or not to frack , 2017, Science.

[18]  M. Altmann,et al.  Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health : study , 2012 .

[19]  M. Douglas,et al.  Ethics-based decision-making and health impact assessment. , 2014, Health promotion international.

[20]  Michael J. Hill.  Shale gas regulation in the UK and health implications of fracking , 2014, The Lancet.

[21]  D. Savitz,et al.  Birth Outcomes and Natural Gas Development: McKenzie et al. Respond , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  S. Pulver,et al.  Making Sense of Corporate Environmentalism , 2007 .

[23]  Peter Jacques,et al.  The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism , 2008 .

[24]  B. Goldstein,et al.  The precautionary principle also applies to public health actions. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[25]  Elaine L. Hill,et al.  Unconventional Natural Gas Development and Infant Health: Evidence from Pennsylvania , 2013 .

[26]  T. Colborn,et al.  Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective , 2011 .

[27]  James A. Young,et al.  Towards Integration of Environmental and Health Impact Assessments for Wild Capture Fishing and Farmed Fish with Particular Reference to Public Health and Occupational Health Dimensions , 2008, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[28]  Andrew Watterson,et al.  Breast cancer risk in relation to occupations with exposure to carcinogens and endocrine disruptors: a Canadian case–control study , 2012, Environmental Health.

[29]  Bernard D. Goldstein,et al.  Missing from the Table: Role of the Environmental Public Health Community in Governmental Advisory Commissions Related to Marcellus Shale Drilling , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  Genevieve A. Kahrilas,et al.  Biocides in hydraulic fracturing fluids: a critical review of their usage, mobility, degradation, and toxicity. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  Z. Shipton.  Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing. , 2012 .

[32]  Liam G. Herringshaw,et al.  Oil and gas wells and their integrity : implications for shale and unconventional resource exploitation , 2014 .

[33]  Michael H. Stephenson,et al.  To Frack or Not to Frack , 2015 .

[34]  Madelon L Finkel,et al.  Public Health England’s draft report on shale gas extraction , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  David Michaels,et al.  Doubt is their product. , 2005, Scientific American.

[36]  Frank Spellman,et al.  Environmental Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing , 2012 .

[37]  Alexis L Maule,et al.  Disclosure of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Chemical Additives: Analysis of Regulations , 2013, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[38]  G. Stix.  Working the system. , 2004, Scientific American.

[39]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Head-to-head randomized trials are mostly industry sponsored and almost always favor the industry sponsor. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  Michael Rempel,et al.  What Works and What Does Not , 2002 .

[41]  Claudia Hornberg,et al.  Environmental Burden of Disease in Europe: Assessing Nine Risk Factors in Six Countries , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[42]  Sue Vink,et al.  Environmental health impacts of unconventional natural gas development: a review of the current strength of evidence. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  R. Fehr,et al.  Environmental health impact assessment: evaluation of a ten-step model. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[44]  D. Woolley.  The White Paper. , 1972, British medical journal.

[45]  Madelon L Finkel,et al.  The rush to drill for natural gas: a public health cautionary tale. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[46]  S. Parkinson,et al.  Shale gas and fracking: examining the evidence , 2014 .

[47]  Sema Mandal,et al.  “Working the System”—British American Tobacco's Influence on the European Union Treaty and Its Implications for Policy: An Analysis of Internal Tobacco Industry Documents , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[48]  Lisa M McKenzie,et al.  Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  Transnational Capitalist Class , 2000 .

[50]  P. Grandjean,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation , 2013 .

[51]  B. Weinhold,et al.  The Future of Fracking: New Rules Target Air Emissions for Cleaner Natural Gas Production , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[52]  V. Trudeau,et al.  Endocrine disruption. , 2007, General and comparative endocrinology.

[53]  R. Löfstedt.  The precautionary principle - Risk, regulation and politics , 2003 .

[54]  Ben Goldacre,et al.  How medicine is broken, and how we can fix it , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  Ruth Harding Rohr Reis,et al.  Thematic Focus : Resource Efficiency , Harmful Substances and Hazardous Waste Gas fracking : can we safely squeeze the rocks ? , 2022 .

[56]  D. Tillitt,et al.  Estrogen and androgen receptor activities of hydraulic fracturing chemicals and surface and ground water in a drilling-dense region. , 2014, Endocrinology.

[57]  Lisa M. McKenzie,et al.  Birth Outcomes and Maternal Residential Proximity to Natural Gas Development in Rural Colorado , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.