Translating response during therapy into ultimate treatment outcome: a personalized 4-dimensional MRI tumor volumetric regression approach in cervical cancer.

PURPOSE To assess individual volumetric tumor regression pattern in cervical cancer during therapy using serial four-dimensional MRI and to define the regression parameters' prognostic value validated with local control and survival correlation. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred and fifteen patients with Stage IB(2)-IVA cervical cancer treated with radiation therapy (RT) underwent serial MRI before (MRI 1) and during RT, at 2-2.5 weeks (MRI 2, at 20-25 Gy), and at 4-5 weeks (MRI 3, at 40-50 Gy). Eighty patients had a fourth MRI 1-2 months post-RT. Mean follow-up was 5.3 years. Tumor volume was measured by MRI-based three-dimensional volumetry, and plotted as dose(time)/volume regression curves. Volume regression parameters were correlated with local control, disease-specific, and overall survival. RESULTS Residual tumor volume, slope, and area under the regression curve correlated significantly with local control and survival. Residual volumes >or=20% at 40-50 Gy were independently associated with inferior 5-year local control (53% vs. 97%, p <0.001) and disease-specific survival rates (50% vs. 72%, p = 0.009) than smaller volumes. Patients with post-RT residual volumes >or=10% had 0% local control and 17% disease-specific survival, compared with 91% and 72% for <10% volume (p <0.001). CONCLUSION Using more accurate four-dimensional volumetric regression analysis, tumor response can now be directly translated into individual patients' outcome for clinical application. Our results define two temporal thresholds critically influencing local control and survival. In patients with >or=20% residual volume at 40-50 Gy and >or=10% post-RT, the risk for local failure and death are so high that aggressive intervention may be warranted.

[1]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Serial therapy-induced changes in tumor shape in cervical cancer and their impact on assessing tumor volume and treatment response. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Association of posttherapy positron emission tomography with tumor response and survival in cervical carcinoma. , 2007, JAMA.

[3]  B. I. Choi,et al.  Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings. , 1990, Radiology.

[4]  Mitchell Morris,et al.  Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  H. Hricak,et al.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. , 1988, Radiology.

[6]  J. van Nagell,et al.  The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findinges. , 1971, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J C Ehrhardt,et al.  Tumor size evaluated by pelvic examination compared with 3-D quantitative analysis in the prediction of outcome for cervical cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  L Axel,et al.  Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the female pelvis: differentiation with MR imaging at 1.5 T. , 1988, Radiology.

[9]  H. Hricak,et al.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. , 1996, Radiology.

[10]  H. Hricak,et al.  Cancer of the uterus: the value of MRI pre- and post-irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  H. Hricak,et al.  Cervical Carcinoma: Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Staging , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Early determination of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma radioresponse identifies high- and low-response tumors. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  P. Grigsby,et al.  The effect of volume of disease in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  J. Wharton,et al.  The influence of tumor size and morphology on the outcome of patients with FIGO stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  V Gildengorin,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: predictive value of clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging assessment of prognostic factors. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Y Narita,et al.  Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy on cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  The outcome of advanced or recurrent non-squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after platinum-based combination chemotherapy. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  H. Hricak,et al.  Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Loh,et al.  Tumor volume and uterine body invasion assessed by MRI for prediction of outcome in cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. , 2007, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[21]  F. Ebner,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer: a basis for objective classification. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[22]  J. Reiber,et al.  Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  K. Ogawa,et al.  Clinical assessment by MRI for patients with stage II cervical carcinoma treated by radiation alone in multicenter analysis: are all patients with stage II disease suitable candidates for chemoradiotherapy? , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  J C Ehrhardt,et al.  Usefulness of tumor volumetry by magnetic resonance imaging in assessing response to radiation therapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  C. Haie-meder,et al.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting residual disease in patients treated for stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma with chemoradiation therapy: Correlation of radiological findings with histology of the cervix , 2008 .