Heterosis of Biomass Production in Arabidopsis. Establishment during Early Development1

Heterosis has been widely used in agriculture to increase yield and to broaden adaptability of hybrid varieties and is applied to an increasing number of crop species. We performed a systematic survey of the extent and degree of heterosis for dry biomass in 63 Arabidopsis accessions crossed to three reference lines (Col-0, C24, and Nd). We detected a high heritability (69%) for biomass production in Arabidopsis. Among the 169 crosses analyzed, 29 exhibited significant mid-parent-heterosis for shoot biomass. Furthermore, we analyzed two divergent accessions, C24 and Col-0, the F1 hybrids of which were shown to exhibit hybrid vigor, in more detail. In the combination Col-0/C24, heterosis for biomass was enhanced at higher light intensities; we found 51% to 66% mid-parent-heterosis at low and intermediate light intensities (60 and 120 μmol m−2 s−1), and 161% at high light intensity (240 μmol m−2 s−1). While at the low and intermediate light intensities relative growth rates of the hybrids were higher only in the early developmental phase (0–15 d after sowing [DAS]), at high light intensity the hybrids showed increased relative growth rates over the entire vegetative phase (until 25 DAS). An important finding was the early onset of heterosis for biomass; in the cross Col-0/C24, differences between parental and hybrid lines in leaf size and dry shoot mass could be detected as early as 10 DAS. The widespread occurrence of heterosis in the model plant Arabidopsis opens the possibility to investigate the genetic basis of this phenomenon using the tools of genetical genomics.

[1]  D. G. León,et al.  Genetic Diversity, Specific Combining Ability, and Heterosis in Tropical Maize under Stress and Nonstress Environments , 2003 .

[2]  P. Annicchiarico,et al.  Heritability of, and genetic correlations among, forage and seed yield traits in Ladino white clover , 1999 .

[3]  J. Langridge.  A Genetic and Molecular Basis for Heterosis in Arabidopsis and Drosophila , 1962, The American Naturalist.

[4]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  Interval mapping of viability loci causing heterosis in Arabidopsis. , 1995, Genetics.

[5]  José Luis Micol,et al.  Genetic analysis of natural variations in the architecture of Arabidopsis thaliana vegetative leaves. , 2002, Genetics.

[6]  V. Hongtrakul,et al.  Amplified fragment length polymorphisms as a tool for DNA fingerprinting sunflower germplasm: genetic diversity among oilseed inbred lines , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[7]  A. J. Muller,et al.  ARABIDOPSIS INFORMATION SERVICE , 1969 .

[8]  E. Garnier,et al.  Variation in relative growth rate and its components in the annual Polygonum aviculare in relation to habitat disturbance and seed size , 1996, Oecologia.

[9]  J. Forster,et al.  Relationships between genetic distance measured by RAPD-PCR and heterosis in inbred lines of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) , 1999, Euphytica.

[10]  Seyed Abolghasem Mohammadi,et al.  Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Crop Plants—Salient Statistical Tools and Considerations , 2003 .

[11]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. investigated by cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) and inter‐simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[12]  D. Comings,et al.  Molecular heterosis: a review. , 2000, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[13]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) from Lycopersicon hirsutum chromosome 1 affecting fruit characteristics and agronomic traits: breaking linkage among QTLs affecting different traits and dissection of heterosis for yield , 2000, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[14]  R. Ecker,et al.  Quantitative genetic analysis of growth rate in lisianthus , 1993 .

[15]  B. V. Milborrow.  A biochemical mechanism for hybrid vigour , 1998 .

[16]  S. Tsaftaris,et al.  Molecular aspects of heterosis in plants , 1995 .

[17]  T. Altmann,et al.  Phosphate acquisition heterosis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a morphological and physiological analysis , 2001, Plant and Soil.

[18]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  Establishment of a high-efficiency SNP-based framework marker set for Arabidopsis. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[19]  N. Syed,et al.  Fast and reliable genotype validation using microsatellite markers in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1999, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  E. Hammond,et al.  Heritability of lipase activity of oat caryopses , 1999 .

[21]  E. Ashby.  Studies in the Inheritance of Physiological Characters: III. Hybrid Vigour in the Tomato: Part. 1. Manifestations of Hybrid Vigour from Germination to the Onset of Flowering , 1937 .

[22]  Jie Yang,et al.  Relationship between molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance in intra- and inter-subspecific crosses of rice , 1999 .

[23]  P. Wareing,et al.  Growth and differentiation in plants , 1981 .

[24]  T. Altmann,et al.  Brassinosteroids Promote Root Growth in Arabidopsis , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[25]  J. Fernández-martínez,et al.  Genetic analysis of yield and related traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in dryland and irrigated environments , 1997, Euphytica.

[26]  A. Melchinger,et al.  Heterosis for biomass yield and related traits in five hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh , 2003, Heredity.

[27]  T. A. Hall,et al.  BIOEDIT: A USER-FRIENDLY BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT EDITOR AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR WINDOWS 95/98/ NT , 1999 .

[28]  T. Dobzhansky,et al.  Genetics of natural populations. XIX. Origin of heterosis through natural selection in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. , 1950, Genetics.

[29]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  Epistasis and Heterosis , 1999 .

[30]  D. Leister,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of plant growth in Arabidopsis thaliana by non-invasive image analysis , 1999 .

[31]  B. Griffing,et al.  Heterosis associated with genotype-environment interactions. , 1971, Genetics.

[32]  R. Sharma,et al.  Variations among races of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) heynh for survival in limited carbon dioxide , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[33]  Renhua Li,et al.  Utilization of Diverse Rice Ecotypes in Heterosis Breeding , 2002 .

[34]  C. Pacheco,et al.  Heterotic groups based on yield-specific combining ability data and phylogenetic relationship determined by RAPD markers for 28 tropical maize open pollinated varieties , 2001, Euphytica.

[35]  Wei-Xia Wang,et al.  Identification of AFLP Markers Favorable to Heterosis in Hybrid Rice , 2002 .

[36]  Cai-guo Xu,et al.  Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  M. Van Montagu,et al.  AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes , 1999, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[38]  I. Geraldi,et al.  Relationship of intra- and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers , 2003, Euphytica.

[39]  J Li,et al.  Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. , 1995, Genetics.

[40]  M. Stitt,et al.  Lateral root frequency decreases when nitrate accumulates in tobacco transformants with low nitrate reductase activity: consequences for the regulation of biomass partitioning between shoots and root1 , 1999, Plant and Soil.

[41]  A. Paterson,et al.  Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. II. Grain yield components. , 2001, Genetics.

[42]  W. Powell,et al.  Comparison of PCR-based marker systems for the analysis of genetic relationships in cultivated potato , 1997, Molecular Breeding.

[43]  A. D. Tomos,et al.  Genetic dissection of root growth in rice (Oryza sativa L.). II: mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular markers , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[44]  Filip Vandenbussche,et al.  Ethylene and Auxin Control the Arabidopsis Response to Decreased Light Intensity1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[45]  A. Paterson,et al.  Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice. I. Biomass and grain yield. , 2001, Genetics.

[46]  J. Görlach,et al.  Growth Stage–Based Phenotypic Analysis of Arabidopsis , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[47]  J. Nap,et al.  Genetical genomics : the added value from segregation , 2001 .

[48]  C. Dillmann,et al.  Genetic variability of proteome expression and metabolic control , 2001 .

[49]  A. Riaz,et al.  Genetic diversity of oilseed Brassica napus inbred lines based on sequence‐related amplified polymorphism and its relation to hybrid performance , 2001 .

[50]  J. M. González,et al.  A fluorimetric method for the estimation of G+C mol% content in microorganisms by thermal denaturation temperature. , 2002, Environmental microbiology.

[51]  G. Shull.  What Is "Heterosis"? , 1948, Genetics.

[52]  K. Lamkey,et al.  Quantitative Genetics of Heterosis , 1999 .

[53]  G. Rédei.  Single locus heterosis , 1962, Zeitschrift für Vererbungslehre.

[54]  J. Lynch.  Root Architecture and Plant Productivity , 1995, Plant physiology.

[55]  A. Ordás,et al.  Heterotic relationships among European maize inbreds , 2002, Euphytica.

[56]  V. Momčilović,et al.  Genetic variation for dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and translocation in two-rowed spring barley: I. Dry matter translocation , 2001 .

[57]  J. R. Williford,et al.  Heterosis in Upland Cotton. II. Relationship of Leaf Area to Plant Photosynthesis , 1988 .

[58]  J. Micol,et al.  Genetic Architecture of NaCl Tolerance in Arabidopsis1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[59]  Byung Han Choi,et al.  The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops , 1997 .

[60]  T. A. Campbell,et al.  Comparisons of genetic and morphological distance with heterosis between Medicago sativa subsp. sativa and subsp. falcata , 2003, Euphytica.

[61]  M. Hoffmann,et al.  Flower Visitors in a Natural Population of Arabidopsis thaliana , 2003 .

[62]  S. Tingey,et al.  Relationship between seed yield heterosis and molecular marker heterozygosity in soybean , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[63]  J. Crow.  Dominance and overdominance , 1999 .

[64]  R H Moll,et al.  The Relationship of Heterosis and Genetic Divergence in Maize. , 1965, Genetics.

[65]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[66]  M. Koornneef,et al.  Natural allelic variation at seed size loci in relation to other life history traits of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  O. Smith,et al.  Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs , 1990, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[68]  C. Cockerham,et al.  Maternal and Reciprocal Effects on Seedling Characters in ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA (L.) Heynh. , 1976, Genetics.

[69]  K. Herrmann.  The Shikimate Pathway as an Entry to Aromatic Secondary Metabolism , 1995, Plant physiology.

[70]  H. Tsukaya,et al.  Genetic control of petiole length in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2002, Plant & cell physiology.

[71]  Y. Pei,et al.  Relationship between hybrid performance and genetic diversity based on RAPD markers in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. , 1999 .