When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning

In immanent justice reasoning, negative events are attributed to some prior moral failing, even in the absence of a physically plausible causal link between them. Drawing on just-world theory, we examined immanent justice reasoning as an intuitive, deservingness-guided form of causal judgment. Participants were exposed to a story about a man who either did or did not cheat on his wife and who was subsequently injured in a car accident. Under either high or low cognitive load, participants rated the extent to which they believed the accident was the result of the man's prior moral failings. The results showed that participants causally attributed the man's accident to his prior conduct when he was immoral (vs. not immoral) more strongly under high cognitive load. Further, moderated mediation analyses showed that perceived deservingness of the accident mediated the effect of the man's prior immoral behavior on immanent justice attributions more strongly under high cognitive load. These results offer support for the notion that immanent justice attributions reflect an automatic tendency to assume that people get what they deserve.

[1]  K. Rosengren,et al.  Imagining the impossible : magical, scientific, and religious thinking in children , 2000 .

[2]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events ☆ , 2009 .

[3]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  Charles R. Seger,et al.  Smile when you say that: Effects of willingness on dispositional inferences☆ , 2008 .

[5]  Joshua A. Hicks,et al.  Ghosts, UFOs, and magic: positive affect and the experiential system. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  J. Piaget.  The Moral Judgment of the Child , 1932 .

[7]  M. Lerner,et al.  When do decent people blame victims? The differing effects of the explicit/rational and implicit/experiential cognitive systems. , 1999 .

[8]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Why people are reluctant to tempt fate. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[10]  C. Hafer,et al.  Investment in Long-Term Goals and Commitment to Just Means Drive the Need to Believe in a Just World , 2000 .

[11]  Aaron C. Kay,et al.  Compensatory Rationalizations and the Resolution of Everyday Undeserved Outcomes , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[12]  P. Rozin,et al.  The makings of the magical mind: The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking. , 2000 .

[13]  Children's and adults' understanding of illness: evidence in support of a coexistence model. , 2002, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[14]  Ramona Bobocel.  The psychology of justice and legitimacy : the Ontario Symposium , 2010 .

[15]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion , 1980 .

[17]  Laurent Bègue,et al.  Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Harold S. Kushner.  When bad thing`s happen to good people , 2014 .

[19]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[20]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Handbook of experimental existential psychology , 2004 .

[21]  J. Ellard,et al.  The Belief in a Just World and Immanent Justice Reasoning in Adults , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[23]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Bewitchment, Biology, or Both: The Co-Existence of Natural and Supernatural Explanatory Frameworks Across Development , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Robbie M. Sutton,et al.  Judgments of voluntary and physical causes in causal chains: probabilistic and social functionalist criteria for attributions , 2007 .

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment , 2008, Cognition.

[26]  M. Lerner.  The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1 , 1977 .

[27]  John McClure,et al.  Selecting explanations from causal chains: Do statistical principles explain preferences for voluntary causes? , 2009 .

[28]  G. Winer,et al.  Evidence of more immanent justice responding in adults than children: A challenge to traditional developmental theories , 2004 .

[29]  M. Lerner,et al.  Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world , 1998 .

[30]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.