Reduced RLT representations for nonconvex polynomial programming problems

This paper explores equivalent, reduced size Reformulation-Linearization Technique (RLT)-based formulations for polynomial programming problems. Utilizing a basis partitioning scheme for an embedded linear equality subsystem, we show that a strict subset of RLT defining equalities imply the remaining ones. Applying this result, we derive significantly reduced RLT representations and develop certain coherent associated branching rules that assure convergence to a global optimum, along with static as well as dynamic basis selection strategies to implement the proposed procedure. In addition, we enhance the RLT relaxations with v-semidefinite cuts, which are empirically shown to further improve the relative performance of the reduced RLT method over the usual RLT approach. We present computational results for randomly generated instances to test the different proposed reduction strategies and to demonstrate the improvement in overall computational effort when such reduced RLT mechanisms are employed.

[1]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2005, SIAM Rev..

[2]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Combined bound-grid-factor constraints for enhancing RLT relaxations for polynomial programs , 2011, J. Glob. Optim..

[3]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  A branch-and-reduce approach to global optimization , 1996, J. Glob. Optim..

[4]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Enhancing RLT-based relaxations for polynomial programming problems via a new class of v-semidefinite cuts , 2012, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[5]  Warren P. Adams,et al.  A Reformulation-Linearization Technique for Solving Discrete and Continuous Nonconvex Problems , 1998 .

[6]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Reduced first-level representations via the reformulation-linearization technique: results, counterexamples, and computations , 2000, Discret. Appl. Math..

[7]  Leo Liberti,et al.  An Exact Reformulation Algorithm for Large Nonconvex NLPs Involving Bilinear Terms , 2006, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  C. Floudas,et al.  Quadratic Optimization , 1995 .

[9]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  New reformulation linearization/convexification relaxations for univariate and multivariate polynomial programming problems , 1997, Oper. Res. Lett..

[10]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Theoretical filtering of RLT bound-factor constraints for solving polynomial programming problems to global optimality , 2013, J. Glob. Optim..

[11]  Alberto Caprara,et al.  Global optimization problems and domain reduction strategies , 2010, Math. Program..

[12]  Leo Liberti,et al.  Branching and bounds tighteningtechniques for non-convex MINLP , 2009, Optim. Methods Softw..

[13]  N. Shor Dual quadratic estimates in polynomial and Boolean programming , 1991 .

[14]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Enhancing RLT relaxations via a new class of semidefinite cuts , 2002, J. Glob. Optim..

[15]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  A reformulation-convexification approach for solving nonconvex quadratic programming problems , 1995, J. Glob. Optim..

[16]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  A global optimization algorithm for polynomial programming problems using a Reformulation-Linearization Technique , 1992, J. Glob. Optim..

[17]  Leo Liberti Linearity Embedded in Nonconvex Programs , 2005, J. Glob. Optim..

[18]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  Exact Algorithms for Global Optimization of Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs , 2002 .

[19]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Comparison of Two Reformulation-Linearization Technique Based Linear Programming Relaxations for Polynomial Programming Problems , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[20]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  A polyhedral branch-and-cut approach to global optimization , 2005, Math. Program..

[21]  P. Pardalos,et al.  Handbook of global optimization , 1995 .