Debating credibility: the shaping of information literacies in upper secondary school

Purpose – The article concerns information literacies in an environment characterised by the two partly competing and contradictory cultures of print and digital. The aim of the paper is to provide a better understanding of the ways in which students assess the credibility of sources they use in school, with a particular interest in how they treat participatory genres.Design/methodology/approach – An ethnographic study of a school class's project work was conducted through observations, interviews, and log books in blog form. The analysis was influenced by a socio‐cultural perspective.Findings – The study provides increased empirically based understanding of students' information literacy practices. Four non‐exclusive approaches to credibility stemming from control, balance, commitment, and multiplicity were identified.Originality/value – The study adds to the understanding of how credibility is assessed in school environments with a particular focus on how digital and participatory genres are treated.

[1]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  A Principle of Uncertainty for Information seeking , 1993, J. Documentation.

[2]  N. Roberts,et al.  Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority: P. Wilson. London: Greenwood Press, 1983. 210 pp. ISBN 0 313 23763 8. £28.95. , 1985 .

[3]  Louise Limberg.  Learning assignment as task in information seeking research , 2007, Inf. Res..

[4]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics and Literacies : Ideology in Discourses , 2008 .

[5]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning , 2006 .

[6]  S. Harding.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[7]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  Documents and Libraries: A Sociotechnical Perspective , 2003 .

[8]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[9]  Helena Francke,et al.  Negotiating the role of sources: Educators' conceptions of credibility in participatory media , 2012 .

[10]  Marc Meola,et al.  Chucking the Checklist: A Contextual Approach to Teaching Undergraduates Web-Site Evaluation , 2004 .

[11]  D. Hengst.  The discussion of Authorship , 2002 .

[12]  David Bawden,et al.  Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts , 2001, J. Documentation.

[13]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Critical Issues Literacy Technologies: What Stance Should We Take? , 1997 .

[15]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  Introduction: digital literacies: concepts, policies and practices , 2008 .

[16]  Louise Limberg.  Three conceptions of information seeking and use , 1999 .

[17]  Jay David Bolter,et al.  Writing Space: Computers, HyperText, and the Remediation of Print , 2001 .

[18]  Alexander Zahar,et al.  Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science , 1991, Medical History.

[19]  Carolyn R. Miller.  Genre as social action , 1984 .

[20]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics and Literacies , 1990 .

[21]  George P. Landow,et al.  HyperText: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology , 1991 .

[22]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[23]  Ross J. Todd.  From information to knowledge: charting and measuring changes in students' knowledge of a curriculum topic , 2006, Inf. Res..

[24]  M. Cole.  Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline? , 1996, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[25]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Helena Francke,et al.  In search of credibility: pupils' information practices in learning environments , 2009, Inf. Res..

[27]  Louise Limberg,et al.  To be lost and to be a loser through the Web , 2008 .

[28]  Annemaree Lloyd,et al.  Framing information literacy as information practice: site ontology and practice theory , 2010, J. Documentation.

[29]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Critical Issues Literacy Technologies: What Stance Should We Take? , 1997 .

[30]  K. Tuominen,et al.  Information Literacy as a Sociotechnical Practice1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[31]  James W. Marcum.  Rethinking Information Literacy , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[32]  Gérard Genette,et al.  Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation , 1997 .

[33]  Louise Limberg,et al.  Constructing meaning through information artefacts , 2003 .

[34]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[35]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[36]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  College Students' Credibility Judgments in the Information-Seeking Process , 2008 .

[37]  Heidi E. Julien,et al.  How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information : A basis for information literacy skills development , 2009 .

[38]  J. Gee.  Social Linguistics And Literacies: Ideology in Discourse , 1996 .

[39]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Learning as the use of tools: a sociocultural perspective on the human-technology link , 1999 .

[40]  Helena Francke,et al.  Format agnostics or format believers? How students in high school use genre to assess credibility , 2009, ASIST.