Abstract An instrumentation variation on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is described that allows simultaneous determination of all detectable elements using a multiple spectrograph and synchronized, multiple CCD spectral acquisition system. The system is particularly suited to the rapid analysis of heterogeneous materials such as coal and mineral ores. For the analysis of a heterogeneous material the acquisition cycle typically stores 1000 spectra for subsequent filtering and analysis. The incorporation of an effective data analysis methodology has been critical in achieving both accurate and reproducible results in the analysis of powders with the technology. Using naturally occurring gypsum as the optimization matrix, various data analysis techniques have been investigated including: using pulse-to-pulse internal standardisation; data filtering; and spectral deconvolution. The incorporation of normalization of the elemental emission to the total plasma emission intensity has been found to yield the single biggest improvement in accuracy and precision. Spectral deconvolution has been found to yield further improvement and is particularly relevant to the analysis of complex materials such as black coal. The use of pulse-to-pulse intensity normalization has the further benefit of extending the period between instrument recalibration, thus enhancing the ease of use of the device. The benefit of the optimized data analysis methodology is revealed in the determination of eight elemental components of gypsum (Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Al, Si, Ti and K) where a typical absolute analysis accuracy of ±10% is obtained. These results compare favourably to analysis by conventional techniques for these materials. The analysis accuracy and repeatability is further demonstrated by the determination of the concentrations of these elements in a black coal sample.
[1]
J. D. Winefordner,et al.
Variables Influencing the Precision of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Measurements
,
1998
.
[2]
David A. Cremers,et al.
Characterization of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) for Application to Space Exploration
,
2000
.
[3]
J. D. Winefordner,et al.
Fundamentals and Applications of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
,
1997
.
[4]
L. J. Radziemski,et al.
Review of Selected Analytical Applications of Laser Plasmas and Laser Ablation, 1987-1994
,
1994
.
[5]
M. Essien,et al.
Detection of cadmium, lead and zinc in aerosols by laser-induced breakdown spectrometry
,
1988
.
[6]
K. Niemax,et al.
On the internal standardization in optical emission spectrometry of microplasmas produced by laser ablation of solid samples
,
1989
.
[7]
D. H. Dieke.
Session 15. Intensities and Transition Probabilities
,
1962
.
[8]
J. Bolger,et al.
Semi-Quantitative Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Analysis of Mineral Drill Core
,
2000
.
[9]
J. Campos,et al.
Determination of Sulfur Content in Steel by Laser-Produced Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
,
1995
.
[10]
D. Body,et al.
Simultaneous elemental analysis system using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy
,
2001
.
[11]
Joseph Sneddon,et al.
Applications of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectrometry
,
1997
.