Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct composite restorations: 10-year findings.

[1]  N. Opdam,et al.  Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  B. Sümegi,et al.  Quantification of Conversion Degree and Monomer Elution from Dental Composite Using HPLC and Micro-Raman Spectroscopy , 2014, Chromatographia.

[3]  N. Opdam,et al.  Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth? , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[4]  J. V. Dijken.  A 6-year prospective evaluation of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive in Class II restorations , 2013 .

[5]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  N. Opdam,et al.  Patient Risk Factors’ Influence on Survival of Posterior Composites , 2013, Journal of dental research.

[7]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results , 2013, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[9]  U. Pallesen,et al.  A six-year prospective randomized study of a nano-hybrid and a conventional hybrid resin composite in Class II restorations. , 2013, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  L. Sandvik,et al.  Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reasons for failure. , 2012, European journal of oral sciences.

[11]  S. Jeges,et al.  [Retrospective study of direct composite restorations according to the USPHS criteria]. , 2012, Fogorvosi szemle.

[12]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  The influence of approximal restoration extension on the development of secondary caries , 2012, BDJ.

[13]  N. Opdam,et al.  Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Nanofilled and microhybrid composite restorations: Five-year clinical wear performances. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  Ho-Nam Lim,et al.  Influence of nano- and micro-filler proportions on the optical property stability of experimental dental resin composites ☆ , 2010 .

[17]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  12-year Survival of Composite vs. Amalgam Restorations , 2010, Journal of dental research.

[18]  J. V. Dijken.  Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: A 12-year follow-up , 2010 .

[19]  P. Neelakantan,et al.  Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins--an in vitro study. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[20]  C. Garvan,et al.  A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. , 2009, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[21]  K. Vandewalle,et al.  Properties of hybrid resin composite systems containing prepolymerized filler particles. , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[22]  L. Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[23]  A. Kiremitçi,et al.  Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations. , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[24]  Reinhard Hickel,et al.  Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[25]  P. S. Lucarotti,et al.  How long do direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales survive? , 2009, BDJ.

[26]  S. Prahl,et al.  Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[27]  M. Vargas,et al.  Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[28]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  Longevity and reasons for failure of sandwich and total-etch posterior composite resin restorations. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[29]  B. Leroux,et al.  Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[30]  J. V. van Dijken,et al.  Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[31]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[32]  J. Devaux,et al.  Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[33]  J. Nör.  Buonocore Memorial Lecture: Tooth Regeneration in Operative Dentistry , 2006 .

[34]  F. Demarco,et al.  A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.

[35]  F. Demarco,et al.  In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. , 2006, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[36]  F. Demarco,et al.  Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[37]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[38]  R. Hickel,et al.  Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. , 2004, Operative dentistry.

[39]  A. Glenny,et al.  European Commission. Radiation Protection136. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology. The safe use of radiographs in dental practice. , 2004 .

[40]  W. D’hoore,et al.  Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[41]  W. Sperr,et al.  Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a review , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[42]  U. Pallesen,et al.  Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[43]  A. Glenny,et al.  European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology; the safe use of radiographs in dental practice. Biomed2 EU contract B4-3040/2001/326435/MAR/C4 , 2002 .

[44]  J. Ferracane,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the marginal degradation of dental composites under simulated occlusal loading. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[45]  N. Meredith,et al.  In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[46]  Blank Lw,et al.  A visible-light-activated resin cured through tooth structure. , 1988 .

[47]  G. Ryge.  Clinical criteria. , 1980, International dental journal.

[48]  G Ryge,et al.  Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. , 1973, Journal of the American Dental Association.