A Sustainable Multicriteria Decision Framework for Obsolescence Resolution Strategy Selection

Parts obsolescence has an important impact on the product life cycle, the manufacturing system and the environment leading to operational, logistical, reliability and cost implications. While current resolution models are cost-oriented, multiple studies have revealed that technological obsolescence is strongly involved in the electronic waste problem. In this study, based on academic literature and expert opinions, a sustainable decision framework for obsolescence resolution strategy (ORS) selection is proposed. It consists of economic, environmental, social and technological dimensions, integrating a total of fifteen criteria. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are suggested to select the most sustainable solution. A case study was performed where the criteria weights and the alternatives performance were judged by five experts from the fields of environment, economy, human resources and obsolescence and operations management. Results from different MCDM methods were compared to the actual decision to evaluate their effectiveness. Using the suggested framework improved the decision process as integrating sustainability had a drastic impact on the selected strategy and consequently on the company’s performance. In addition to its managerial insights, this paper provides a new research perspective to sustainable and robust obsolescence management to effectively handle the increasing number and severity of obsolete components.

[1]  Yongbo Li,et al.  Application of DEMATEL approach to identify the influential indicators towards sustainable supply chain adoption in the auto components manufacturing sector , 2018 .

[2]  Vildan Özkir,et al.  A FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL UPON THE ESTIMATION OF ELECTRONIC-WASTE PRODUCTS IN ISTANBUL , 2012 .

[3]  Zhenyang Shi Optimal remanufacturing and acquisition decisions in warranty service considering part obsolescence , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[4]  Bopaya Bidanda,et al.  Modeling sustainable product lifecycle decision support systems , 2009 .

[5]  Peter Sandborn Forecasting technology and part obsolescence , 2017 .

[6]  Iván A. Contreras,et al.  Two-level lot-sizing with raw-material perishability and deterioration , 2019, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  Karen High,et al.  Screening of process alternatives based on sustainability metrics: comparison of two decision-making approaches , 2015 .

[8]  Chris Wilkinson,et al.  Obsolescence and Life Cycle Management for Avionics , 2015 .

[9]  Pameet Singh,et al.  Obsolescence Driven Design Refresh Planning for Sustainment-Dominated Systems , 2006 .

[10]  Ronald Iammartino,et al.  Software obsolescence risk assessment approach using multicriteria decision‐making , 2018, Syst. Eng..

[11]  Jeffrey E. Kottemann,et al.  Decisional Conflict and User Acceptance of Multicriteria Decision-Making Aids , 1991 .

[12]  Fabián Echegaray,et al.  Consumers’ reactions to product obsolescence in emerging markets: the case of Brazil , 2016 .

[13]  Kung-Jeng Wang,et al.  Strategic capacity portfolio planning under demand uncertainty and technological change , 2019, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal.

[14]  Ruediger Kuehr,et al.  The Global E-waste Monitor 2017: Quantities, Flows and Resources , 2015 .

[15]  Luciano Ferreira,et al.  Development of an integrated decision-making method for an oil refinery restructuring in Brazil , 2016 .

[16]  Sunil Herat,et al.  Sustainable Management of Electronic Waste (e-Waste) , 2007 .

[17]  Daria Battini,et al.  Sustainability in Material Purchasing: A Multi-Objective Economic Order Quantity Model under Carbon Trading , 2018, Sustainability.

[18]  Shaoxuan Liu,et al.  Optimal inventory control and design refresh selection in managing part obsolescence , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Alexandre André Feil,et al.  Sustainability Indicators for Industrial Organizations: Systematic Review of Literature , 2019, Sustainability.

[20]  Christopher J. Willy,et al.  Managing system obsolescence via multicriteria decision making , 2018, Syst. Eng..

[21]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[22]  Pratik Pingle Selection of obsolescence resolution strategy based on a multi criteria decision model , 2015 .

[23]  Janis Terpenny,et al.  Design refresh planning models for managing obsolescence , 2015 .

[24]  G. Büyüközkan,et al.  Sustainability performance evaluation: Literature review and future directions. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Pameet Singh,et al.  Lifetime Buy Optimization to Minimize Lifecycle Cost , 2007 .

[26]  Sara Behdad,et al.  Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components , 2017 .

[27]  Leif Olsson,et al.  Strategic Proactive Obsolescence Management Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology.

[28]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[29]  Peter Sandborn,et al.  Design for Obsolescence Risk Management , 2013 .

[30]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Attractiveness of decision rules , 1980 .

[31]  Paweł Ziemba,et al.  Towards Strong Sustainability Management—A Generalized PROSA Method , 2019, Sustainability.

[32]  J. Terpenny,et al.  Forecasting Obsolescence Risk and Product Life Cycle With Machine Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology.

[33]  J. Fiksel Sustainability and Resilience: Toward a Systems Approach , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[34]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  End-of-life service , 1999 .

[35]  Haritha Saranga,et al.  Optimal selection of obsolescence mitigation strategies using a restless bandit model , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Sean P. Willems,et al.  Modeling sourcing strategies to mitigate part obsolescence , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..