Supporting Struggling Readers and Literacy Clinicians Through Reflective Video Pedagogy

Purpose – This chapter provides the reader with an overview of a reflective video pedagogy for use within a literacy center or within professional development contexts. The conceptual overview is followed by two-case examples that reveal how literacy centers can serve as rich, productive research sites for the use and study of reflective video pedagogy. Methodology/approach – The authors describe their ongoing work to develop and integrate a reflective video pedagogy within a literacy center during a 15-week practicum for literacy-specialists-in-training. The reflective video pedagogy is not only used by the clinicians who work with struggling readers twice a week, but it is also used by the researchers at the literacy center who study the reflective video pedagogy through the same video the clinicians use. Practical implications – Literacy centers are dynamic sites where children, families, pre/in-service teachers, and teacher educators work together around literacy development. Reflective video pedagogies can be used to closely examine learning and teaching for adult students (i.e., clinicians) and for youth (i.e., children in elementary, middle, and high school) and also for parents who want their children to find success with literacy. Research implications – In recent years “scaling up” and “scientific research” have come to dominate much of the literacy research landscape. While we see the value and necessity of large-scale experimental studies, we also posit that literacy centers have a unique role to play. Given that resources are scarce, literacy scholars must maximize the affordances of literacy centers as rich, productive research sites for the use and study of a reflective video pedagogy.

[1]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[2]  J. Dewey,et al.  Knowing and the Known , 1949 .

[3]  Mary B. McVee,et al.  Schema Theory Revisited , 2005 .

[4]  Willis D. Copeland,et al.  Video cases and the development of meaning making in preservice teachers , 1996 .

[5]  Joel A. Michael,et al.  Hinting as a Tactic in One-on-One Tutoring , 1996 .

[6]  Robert J. Marzano,et al.  Classroom Assessment & Grading That Work , 2006 .

[7]  J. Banks American Educational Research Association The Lives and Values of Researchers : Implications for Educating Citizens in a Multicultural Society , 2008 .

[8]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[9]  N. Noddings Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education , 1984 .

[10]  ‘How does your teacher help you to make your work better?’ Children's understanding of formative assessment , 1996 .

[11]  David Reinking,et al.  THE ELECTRONIC TRANSFORMATION OF LITERACY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STRUGGLING READER , 1999 .

[12]  Tammy Brown Learning to Read: The Unofficial Scripts of Succeeders and Strugglers , 2010 .

[13]  J. Knight Scientific literacy: Clear as mud , 2003, Nature.

[14]  Joelle K. Jay,et al.  Capturing complexity: a typology of reflective practice for teacher education , 2002 .

[15]  L. Shulman,et al.  How and What Teachers Learn: A Shifting Perspective , 2004 .

[16]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[17]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[18]  Talking the Talk: A Close Examination of Teacher-Student Discourse Around Written Artifacts , 2003 .

[19]  B. J. Walker Thinking Aloud: Struggling Readers Often Require More Than a Model , 2005 .

[20]  P. G. Schrader,et al.  Using Internet delivered video cases, to support pre-service teachers' understanding of effective early literacy instruction: An exploratory study , 2003 .

[21]  A. Sfard On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[22]  B. Weiner Attribution Theory, Achievement Motivation, and the Educational Process , 1972 .

[23]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[24]  J. Dewey THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE SCIENCE AS SUBJECT-MATTER AND AS METHOD. , 1910, Science.

[25]  Michael W. Kibby Practical Steps for Informing Literacy Instruction: A Diagnostic Decision-Making Model , 1995 .

[26]  Gordon Wells,et al.  Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom , 1993 .

[27]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Video Collaboratories for Research and Education: An Analysis of Collaboration Design Patterns , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.