Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning?

Summative assessments that are integrated within the daily pedagogy of teachers are problematic. Some argue that they cannot both be helpful to pedagogy and yield results that are comparable across and between schools. Others claim that there is enough evidence to show that these targets can be achieved. The project described in this paper explored how teachers might enhance their competence in summative assessment in ways which might also have a positive effect on their teaching and learning. A strategy was developed based on five key features of summative assessment practices. The findings, from a longitudinal study with 18 teachers, are based on the teachers’ opinions, both about the quality of the results which they achieved, and about the positive impacts on the involvement of pupils, on collaboration between teachers, and on interaction with parents. The project involved teachers of English and mathematics in three schools, working with the authors, over two-and-a-half years.

[1]  Allan S. Cohen,et al.  Threats to the Valid Use of Assessments , 1996 .

[2]  Wynne Harlen,et al.  Testing, motivation and learning , 2002 .

[3]  Jeremy Hodgen,et al.  Validity in teachers’ summative assessments , 2010 .

[4]  Kelly S. Shapley,et al.  Developing a Valid and Reliable Portfolio Assessment in the Primary Grades: Building on Practical Experience , 1999 .

[5]  National curriculum assessment in England: how well has it worked? Perspectives from the UK, Europe and beyond , 2009 .

[6]  P. Newton The reliability of results from national curriculum testing in England , 2009 .

[7]  G. Stobart,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Evidence of Reliability and Validity of Assessment by Teachers Used for Summative Purposes , 2004 .

[8]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[9]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Dynamic assessment in the language classroom , 2005 .

[10]  R. Daugherty,et al.  Summative Assessment by Teachers , 2010 .

[11]  Daniel Koretz,et al.  Large‐scale Portfolio Assessments in the US: evidence pertaining to the quality of measurement , 1998 .

[12]  Paul E. Newton,et al.  Assessment in schools. Fit for purpose? A Commentary by the Teaching and Learning Research Programme. , 2009 .

[13]  G. Stobart Determining validity in national curriculum assessments , 2009 .

[14]  Paul Black,et al.  Large-scale assessment systems: Design principles drawn from international comparisons , 2007 .

[15]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .