Modeling the potential effects of atrazine on aquatic communities in midwestern streams

The comprehensive aquatic systems model for atrazine (CASM(ATZ)) estimates the potential toxic effects of atrazine on populations of aquatic plants and consumers in a generic lower-order midwestern stream. The CASM(ATZ) simulates the daily production of 20 periphyton and 6 aquatic vascular plant species. The modeled consumer community consists of 17 functionally defined species of zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, bacteria, and fish. Daily values of population biomass (grams of carbon per square meter) are calculated as nonlinear functions of population bioenergetics, physical-chemical environmental parameters, grazing/predator-prey interactions, and population-specific direct and indirect responses to atrazine. The CASM(ATZ) uses Monte Carlo methods to characterize the implications of phenotypic variability, environmental variability, and uncertainty associated with atrazine toxicity data in estimating the potential impacts of time-varying atrazine exposures on population biomass and community structure. Comparisons of modeled biomass values for plants and consumers with published data indicate that the generic reference simulation realistically describes ecological production in lower-order midwestern streams. Probabilistic assessments were conducted using the CASM(ATZ) to evaluate potential modeled changes in plant community structure resulting from measured atrazine exposure profiles in 3 midwestern US streams representing watersheds highly vulnerable to runoff. Deviation in the median values of maximum 30-d average Steinhaus similarity index ranged from 0.09% to 2.52% from the reference simulation. The CASM(ATZ) could therefore be used for the purposes of risk assessment by comparison of site monitoring-based model output to a biologically relevant Steinhaus similarity index level of concern. Used as a generic screening technology or in site-specific applications, the CASM(AT) provides an effective, coherent, and transparent modeling framework for assessing ecological risks posed by pesticides in lower-order streams.

[1]  R. Brain,et al.  Recovery of duckweed from time‐varying exposure to atrazine , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[2]  U. Uehlinger,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of the periphyton biomass in a prealpine river (Necker, Switzerland) , 1991 .

[3]  A. Benke.  PRODUCTION DYNAMICS OF RIVERINE CHIRONOMIDS: EXTREMELY HIGH BIOMASS TURNOVER RATES OF PRIMARY CONSUMERS , 1998 .

[4]  Wataru Naito,et al.  Application of an ecosystem model for aquatic ecological risk assessment of chemicals for a Japanese lake. , 2002, Water research.

[5]  Tom Aldenberg,et al.  A food web model for fate and direct and indirect effects of Dursban® 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) in freshwater microcosms , 1998, Aquatic Ecology.

[6]  S. Fisher,et al.  Periphyton production in Fort River, Massachusetts , 1979 .

[7]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Patterns of toxicological effects in ecosystems: A modeling study , 1983 .

[8]  R. Neves.  Secondary Production of Epilithic Fauna in a Woodland Stream , 1979 .

[9]  C. I. Bliss,et al.  THE METHOD OF PROBITS. , 1934, Science.

[10]  J. Webster,et al.  Periphyton Response to Nutrient Manipulation in Streams Draining Clearcut and Forested Watersheds , 1986, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[11]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Model of Fish Biomass Dynamics , 1974 .

[12]  K. Thornton,et al.  A Temperature Algorithm for Modifying Biological Rates , 1978 .

[13]  H. Maccrimmon,et al.  Assessing Changes in Biomass of Riverbed Periphyton , 1978 .

[14]  S. Bartell.  A framework for estimating ecological risks posed by nutrients and trace elements in the Patuxent River , 2003 .

[15]  S. Perry,et al.  Secondary Production of Macroinvertebrate Shredders in Headwater Streams with Different Baseflow Alkalinity , 1994, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  Wataru Naito,et al.  Evaluation of an ecosystem model in ecological risk assessment of chemicals. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[17]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Effects of Nutrient Recycling and Food-Chain Length on Resilience , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[18]  J. Oorschot.  Selectivity and physiological inactivation of some herbicides inhibiting photosynthesis , 1965 .

[19]  F. Schöll,et al.  Modelling the Chlorophyll a Content of the River Rhine - Interrelation between Riverine Algal Production and Population Biomass of Grazers, Rotifers and the Zebra Mussel, Dreissena polymorpha , 2002 .

[20]  S. Bartell,et al.  An ecosystem model for assessing ecological risks in Québec rivers, lakes, and reservoirs , 1999 .

[21]  P. Jursinic,et al.  Changes in [C]Atrazine Binding Associated with the Oxidation-Reduction State of the Secondary Quinone Acceptor of Photosystem II. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[22]  J. A. Rice,et al.  Independent Evaluation of A Bioenergetics Model For Largemouth Bass , 1984 .

[23]  E. Morris,et al.  Atrazine degradation in soils: the role of microbial communities, atrazine application history, and soil carbon , 2005 .

[24]  P. Cornish,et al.  Atrazine Tolerance of Grass Species with Potential for Use in Vegetated Filters in Australia , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[25]  J. Webster,et al.  Periphyton Production in an Appalachian Mountain Trout Stream , 1981 .

[26]  C. Krueger,et al.  ANNUAL PRODUCTION OF MACROINVERTEBRATES IN THREE STREAMS OF DIFFERENT WATER QUALITY , 1983 .

[27]  T. Kwak,et al.  Trout production dynamics and water quality in Minnesota streams , 1997 .

[28]  W. Hill,et al.  Noeffects of ambient UV radiation detected in periphyton and grazers , 1997 .

[29]  R. Brain,et al.  Recovery of photosynthesis and growth rate in green, blue–green, and diatom algae after exposure to atrazine , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[30]  A. L. Baker,et al.  Seasonal succession of the phytoplankton in the upper Mississippi River , 1981, Hydrobiologia.

[31]  S. G. Hildebrand,et al.  Ecosystem risk analysis: A new methodology , 1982 .

[32]  B. Escher,et al.  Effect of pulse herbicidal exposure on Scenedesmus vacuolatus: A comparison of two photosystem II inhibitors , 2008 .

[33]  C. Godwin,et al.  Spatio-temporal variation of periphyton biomass and accumulation in a temperate spring-fed stream , 2008, Aquatic Ecology.

[34]  R. S. Booth,et al.  A Production Model for Myriophyllum spicatum L. , 1975 .

[35]  Basil Acock,et al.  Modularity and genericness in plant and ecosystem models , 1997 .

[36]  G. Likens,et al.  Trophic basis of invertebrate production in 2 streams at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[37]  Field Evaluation of the Littoral Ecosystem Risk Assessment Model's Predictions of the Effects of Chlorpyrifos , 1994 .

[38]  Shyam K. Nair,et al.  Characterizing aquatic ecological risks from pesticides using a diquat dibromide case study III. Ecological process models , 2000 .

[39]  J. Ward,et al.  Energy flow through macroinvertebrates in a polluted plains stream , 2002, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[40]  M. Whiles,et al.  Macroinvertebrate communities in agriculturally impacted southern Illinois streams: patterns with riparian vegetation, water quality, and in-stream habitat quality. , 2005, Journal of environmental quality.

[41]  Tom Aldenberg,et al.  Modeling and Risk Assessment of Tributyltin Accumulation in the Food Web of a Shallow Freshwater Lake , 1996 .

[42]  R. R. Horner,et al.  Nuisance biomass levels of periphytic algae in streams , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[43]  M. Wiley,et al.  Longitudinal Structure of an Agricultural Prairie River System and its Relationship to Current Stream Ecosystem Theory , 1990 .