Organizing and Reorganizing Coordination Patterns.

Understanding how the nervous system learns to coordinate the large number of degrees of freedom in the body to produce goal-directed movement is not only one of the central questions in theoretical movement neuroscience, but also has direct relevance for movement rehabilitation. In spite of the centrality of this issue, the literature on how a new coordination pattern is acquired and refined when first learning a novel task remains surprisingly small relative to studies that focus on modifications of already well-learned coordination patterns. In this chapter, we outline some of the reasons behind why the study of coordination continues to pose a serious challenge for movement neuroscience, particularly when it comes to systematically studying and testing hypotheses on how new coordination patterns are organized and reorganized with practice. We then describe a novel experimental paradigm-the body-machine interface (BoMI)-that has been developed and used over the last decade to examine this issue. The paradigm combines the control of a large number of degrees of freedom along with a linear mapping, which makes it appealing to examine how coordination of these high degrees of freedom is organized in a systematic fashion. Finally, we outline some of the new insights that this paradigm has provided into classic issues of motor learning such as the learning of high-dimensional spaces, generalization, and transfer.

[1]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Marc W Slutzky,et al.  Reducing Abnormal Muscle Coactivation After Stroke Using a Myoelectric-Computer Interface , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[3]  K. Newell,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  David Zipser,et al.  Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Motor Task Variation Induces Structural Learning , 2009, Current Biology.

[6]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Learning to be Lazy: Exploiting Redundancy in a Novel Task to Minimize Movement-Related Effort , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Arnold Gesell,et al.  The ontogenesis of infant behavior. , 1946 .

[8]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The construction of movement by the spinal cord , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Roberton,et al.  Longitudinal changes in children's overarm throw ball velocities. , 1979, Research quarterly.

[10]  C. Osgood The similarity paradox in human learning; a resolution. , 1949, Psychological review.

[11]  Maura Casadio,et al.  Reorganization of finger coordination patterns during adaptation to rotation and scaling of a newly learned sensorimotor transformation. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Elias B. Thorp,et al.  Remapping residual coordination for controlling assistive devices and recovering motor functions , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Howard Poizner,et al.  Impaired Endogenously Evoked Automated Reaching in Parkinson's Disease , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[15]  Armin Biess,et al.  A Computational Model for Redundant Human Three-Dimensional Pointing Movements: Integration of Independent Spatial and Temporal Motor Plans Simplifies Movement Dynamics , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Camilla Pierella,et al.  Upper Body-Based Power Wheelchair Control Interface for Individuals With Tetraplegia , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  The Body-Machine Interface: A New Perspective on an Old Theme , 2012, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Francisco J. Valero Cuevas,et al.  Challenges and New Approaches to Proving the Existence of Muscle Synergies of Neural Origin , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Functional reorganization of upper-body movement after spinal cord injury , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Aymar de Rugy,et al.  Are muscle synergies useful for neural control? , 2013, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[22]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  A. Bastian Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[25]  M. Roberton,et al.  Individual Pathways in the Development of Forceful Throwing , 2002, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[26]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Representation of Muscle Synergies in the Primate Brain , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Paola Cesari,et al.  Body-goal Variability Mapping in an Aiming Task , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  Simon Giszter,et al.  Primitives, premotor drives, and pattern generation: a combined computational and neuroethological perspective. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[30]  B A Cohn,et al.  Exploring the high-dimensional structure of muscle redundancy via subject-specific and generic musculoskeletal models. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Learning Redundant Motor Tasks with and without Overlapping Dimensions: Facilitation and Interference Effects , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Kelso Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[33]  K. Newell Motor skill acquisition. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Xiaolin Liu,et al.  Contributions of online visual feedback to the learning and generalization of novel finger coordination patterns. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning , 2006, PLoS biology.

[36]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[37]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Mei-Hua Lee,et al.  Body-machine interface for control of a screen cursor for a child with congenital absence of upper and lower limbs: a case report , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[39]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Differences in Adaptation Rates after Virtual Surgeries Provide Direct Evidence for Modularity , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[42]  J. Adams Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. , 1987 .

[43]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  C Ghez,et al.  Learning of Visuomotor Transformations for Vectorial Planning of Reaching Trajectories , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos,et al.  Brain-machine interface: Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002, Nature.

[46]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Structure learning in action , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[47]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  A. Jackson,et al.  Flexible Cortical Control of Task-Specific Muscle Synergies , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[50]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Adaptation to visual feedback delay in a redundant motor task. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  E Thelen,et al.  Development of reaching during the first year: role of movement speed. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[53]  Jesse M. Lingeman,et al.  How Do You Learn to Walk? Thousands of Steps and Dozens of Falls per Day , 2012, Psychological science.

[54]  David Zipser,et al.  Computing movement geometry: a step in sensory-motor transformations. , 2007, Progress in brain research.