Trichloroacetic Acid Application Versus Spray Monopolar Diathermy for Treating Benign Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Objective This study aimed to compare efficacy, tolerability, and safety of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) painting versus monopolar spray coagulation of the cervix for treating persistent benign cervical lesions. Materials and Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was done in a tertiary care referral facility and university hospital. A total of 246 cases with objective evidence of benign cervical lesions were divided into 2 groups according to the line of management. Group A was composed of 126 cases subjected to spray monopolar coagulation, whereas group B was composed of 120 cases subjected to TCA application. Cervical smearing and colposcopy with or without cervical biopsy were performed to exclude underlying malignant lesions. Trichloroacetic acid painting or spray monopolar coagulation of the benign cervical lesion(s) was also performed. Follow-up was performed to assess relief of symptoms and cervical morphology for 1 month. Main outcome measures include success of management tool, relief of symptoms, and normal cervical morphology after 1 month of therapy. Results A statistically significant cure rate of cervical lesions after treatment in both groups without significant difference between both groups was reported. Failure rate was reported more in group B than group A mainly owing to hypertrophied ectopy and cervical polyp. Patient in group A reported low satisfaction (26.9%) and poor tolerability rate (44.5%) as compared with patients in group B, who reported high satisfaction (77.5%) and good tolerability rate (77.5%), this difference was statistically significant. Conclusions Both topical application of 70% TCA and monopolar spray coagulation offer considerable efficacy, acceptable success rates, and minimal complications. Spray coagulation is significantly superior in terms of less persistent or incompletely healed lesions. Nevertheless, topical application of 70% TCA has the advantages of simplicity, higher patient tolerability, and safety, which can be widely used by gynecologists who have limited experience with surgical procedures. It is highly recommended if the cervical lesion is ectopy or nonspecific cervicitis but not hypertrophic lesion such as hypertrophic ectopy or polyp.

[1]  H. Dickinson,et al.  Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  J. Stringer,et al.  Are treatments for cervical precancerous lesions in less-developed countries safe enough to promote scaling-up of cervical screening programs? A systematic review , 2010, BMC women's health.

[3]  E. Huang,et al.  Therapeutic effect of topical applications of trichloroacetic acid for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia after hysterectomy. , 2005, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[4]  S. Pinion,et al.  A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prilocaine and Felypressin (Citanest and Octapressin) for the Relief of Pain Associated with Cervical Biopsy and Treatment with the Semm Coagulator , 2005, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[5]  A. Moscicki,et al.  External genital warts: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  Mark Sherman,et al.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  C. Lacey Genital warts and genital papillomavirus disease , 2001 .

[8]  H. Ngan,et al.  Wide local excision (WLE) for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) , 1999, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[9]  A. Darwish,et al.  One‐step management of cervical lesions , 1998, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[10]  N. Husseinzadeh,et al.  Subclinical cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infections associated with cervical condylomata and dysplasia. Treatment outcomes. , 1994, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[11]  J. Mikuta,et al.  Single Application Treatment of Human Papillomavirus Infection of the Cervix and Vagina With Trichloroacetic Acid: A Randomized Trial , 1990, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  R. Roenigk,et al.  Depths of chemexfoliation induced by various concentrations and application techniques of trichloroacetic acid in a porcine model. , 1989, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[13]  G. Nuovo,et al.  Extended carbon dioxide laser vaporization in the treatment of subclinical papillomavirus infection of the lower genital tract. , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  R. Richart,et al.  Cryotherapy and Carbon Dioxide Laser Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Controlled Comparison , 1983, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  J. Palefsky,et al.  Efficacy of trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men who have sex with men. , 2009, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[16]  R. Woolas,et al.  Large Loop Diathermy of the Transformation Zone: Is ‘See and Treat’ An Acceptable Option for the Management of Women with Abnormal Cervical Smears? , 1994 .

[17]  Richart Rm,et al.  Cryotherapy and carbon dioxide laser management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a controlled comparison. , 1983 .