Utility of Static Pressure Ratio Recording during Angioplasty of Arteriovenous Graft Stenosis

Intra‐access static pressure ratio (SPR) (intra‐access pressure/mean arterial pressure) can be measured during angioplasty (PTA) to assess the functional importance of an arteriovenous graft (AVG) stenosis. We used SPR in 70 patients with AVGs who underwent 98 angioplasty procedures. SPR was measured during angioplasty by placing a catheter tip at mid‐access. Inflow stenosis (IF) = stenosis proximal to the tip of the catheter. Outflow stenosis (OF) = stenosis distal to the tip of the catheter up to the superior vena cava‐atrial junction. Post PTA, access flow (Qa) was assessed within 2 weeks. Complete data sets for both SPR and Qa were available in 83 procedures. Using a normal SPR ratio of 0.3–0.4 at mid‐graft, three patterns of SPR were noted. In 63 of 83 (76%) cases SPR was elevated prior to PTA (0.71 ± 0.13 SD). PTA reduced SPR toward normal range (0.44 ± 0.12) in 53 cases (84%). In the remaining 10 (16%), SPR decreased to a low value (0.22 ± 0.03) and normalized (0.40 ± .0.11) only after PTA of a coexisting inflow stenosis. In 12 of 83 (14%) procedures, the initial SPR was low (0.18 ± 0.04) and increased toward normal (0.3 ± 0.08) following IF stenosis PTA in seven (58%) cases. For the remaining five (42%) cases SPR increased to a high value (0.70 ± 0.21) and decreased toward normal range (0.33 ± 0.07) only after OF stenosis angioplasty. In 8 of 83 (10%) procedures, initial SPR was normal (0.33 ± 0.02). Angiography revealed coexisting IF and OF stenoses. SPR remained within the normal range after PTA of these lesions (0.33 ± 0.02). Qa increased significantly in 74 of 83 (89%) procedures (before = 572 ± 201, after = 1109 ± 368 ml/min; p < 0.001). SPR measurements can assist in hemodynamic assessment of an AVG during angioplasty procedure.

[1]  S. Bander,et al.  Opinion: Is Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty an Effective Intervention for Arteriovenous Graft Stenosis? , 2005, Seminars in dialysis.

[2]  T. Vesely Endovascular intervention for the failing vascular access. , 2002, Advances in renal replacement therapy.

[3]  Robin D Gleed,et al.  Use of a catheter-based system to measure blood flow in hemodialysis grafts during angioplasty procedures. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[4]  P. Blankestijn,et al.  Short- and long-term functional effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in hemodialysis vascular access. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[5]  A. Aslam,et al.  Effects of Systemic Hemodynamics on Flow within Vascular Accesses Used for Hemodialysis , 2001, ASAIO journal.

[6]  D. Windus,et al.  Flow in hemodialysis grafts after angioplasty: Do radiologic criteria predict success? , 2001, Kidney international.

[7]  A. Besarab Access Monitoring Methods , 2000, Blood Purification.

[8]  A. Besarab,et al.  Detection of Access Strictures and Outlet Stenoses in Vascular Accesses Which Test Is Best? , 1997, ASAIO journal.

[9]  A. Besarab,et al.  Detecting Vascular Access Dysfunction , 1997, ASAIO journal.

[10]  S. Carozzi,et al.  Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Resistance in Hemodialysis Effects of Paired Filtration Dialysis , 1997, ASAIO journal.

[11]  M. Moritz,et al.  Utility of intra-access pressure monitoring in detecting and correcting venous outlet stenoses prior to thrombosis. , 1995, Kidney international.

[12]  M. Moritz,et al.  Hemodynamics of Failing Dialysis Grafts , 1993, Radiology.

[13]  G. Beathard,et al.  Percutaneous transvenous angioplasty in the treatment of vascular access stenosis. , 1992, Kidney international.

[14]  M. Moritz,et al.  Venous access pressures and the detection of intra-access stenosis. , 1992, ASAIO journal.

[15]  O. Djurdjev,et al.  C4d deposition in acute rejection: an independent long-term prognostic factor. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.