Hidden scaling patterns and universality in written communication.

The temporal statistics exhibited by written correspondence appear to be media dependent, with features which have so far proven difficult to characterize. We explain the origin of these difficulties by disentangling the role of spontaneous activity from decision-based prioritizing processes in human dynamics, clocking all waiting times through each agent's "proper time" measured by activity. This unveils the same fundamental patterns in written communication across all media (letters, email, sms), with response times displaying truncated power-law behavior and average exponents near -3/2. When standard time is used, the response time probabilities are theoretically predicted to exhibit a bimodal character, which is empirically borne out by our newly collected years-long data on email. These perspectives on the temporal dynamics of human correspondence should aid in the analysis of interaction phenomena in general, including resource management, optimal pricing and routing, information sharing, and emergency handling.

[1]  Alex Kentsis,et al.  Correspondence patterns: Mechanisms and models of human dynamics , 2006, Nature.

[2]  Herwig Bruneel,et al.  Stochastic queueing-theory approach to human dynamics. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  W. Conover.  A Kolmogorov Goodness-of-Fit Test for Discontinuous Distributions , 1972 .

[4]  Staša Milojević.  Power law distributions in information science: Making the case for logarithmic binning , 2010 .

[5]  D. R. Chialvo,et al.  Unraveling the fluctuations of animal motor activity. , 2009, Chaos.

[6]  Ward Whitt,et al.  Asymptotics for M/G/1 low-priority waiting-time tail probabilities , 1997, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[7]  Bruno Gonçalves,et al.  Human dynamics revealed through Web analytics , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Kyung C. Chae,et al.  Discrete-time queues with discretionary priorities , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Zbigniew R. Struzik,et al.  Of Mice and Men — Universality and Breakdown of Behavioral Organization , 2008, PloS one.

[10]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Evidence for a bimodal distribution in human communication , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  D. Chialvo,et al.  Poissonian bursts in e-mail correspondence , 2009, 0907.1263.

[12]  T Maillart,et al.  Quantification of deviations from rationality with heavy tails in human dynamics. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  How Random are Online Social Interactions? , 2012, Scientific reports.

[14]  R Linsker,et al.  Power-law and exponential tails in a stochastic priority-based model queue. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Zhi-Dan Zhao,et al.  Empirical Analysis on the Human Dynamics of a Large-Scale Short Message Communication System , 2011 .

[16]  Alexei Vázquez,et al.  Exact results for the Barabási model of human dynamics. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  Jin-Li Guo,et al.  Human dynamics scaling characteristics for aerial inbound logistics operation , 2010 .

[18]  Gueorgi Kossinets,et al.  Empirical Analysis of an Evolving Social Network , 2006, Science.

[19]  Alexei Vazquez.  Impact of memory on human dynamics , 2007 .

[20]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Power law signature of media exposure in human response waiting time distributions. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Invasion percolation and the time scaling behavior of a queuing model of human dynamics , 2009 .

[22]  Anders Johansen.  Comment on A.-L. Barabasi, Nature 435 207-211 (2005) , 2006 .

[23]  K-I Goh,et al.  Waiting time dynamics of priority-queue networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  John W. Emerson,et al.  Nonparametric Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Discrete Null Distributions , 2011, R J..

[25]  R. Rousseau,et al.  LOTKA: A program to fit a power law distribution to observed frequency data. , 2000 .

[26]  Won-kuk Cho,et al.  Generalized priority-queue network dynamics: impact of team and hierarchy. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  S. Havlin,et al.  Scaling laws of human interaction activity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Jean-Pierre Eckmann,et al.  Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A. Vazquez,et al.  Impact of interactions on human dynamics , 2007, 0710.4916.

[30]  I. Introduction.  Modeling human activity in the spirit of Barabasi's queueing systems , 2007 .

[31]  Lei Gao,et al.  Individual and Group Dynamics in Purchasing Activity , 2010, ArXiv.

[32]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[33]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Dynamics of information access on the web. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Adilson E. Motter,et al.  A Poissonian explanation for heavy tails in e-mail communication , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Human dynamics: Darwin and Einstein correspondence patterns , 2005, Nature.

[36]  Yanheng Liu,et al.  Model for human dynamics based on habit , 2010 .

[37]  L. Amaral,et al.  On Universality in Human Correspondence Activity , 2009, Science.

[38]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[39]  Saleem N. Bhatti,et al.  Modelling user behaviour in networked games , 2001, MULTIMEDIA '01.

[40]  Jayanth R Banavar,et al.  Scale invariance in the dynamics of spontaneous behavior , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Premananda Indic,et al.  Scaling Behavior of Human Locomotor Activity Amplitude: Association with Bipolar Disorder , 2011, PloS one.

[42]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Effects of Diversity and Procrastination in Priority Queuing Theory: the Different Power Law Regimes , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[44]  Alan Cobham,et al.  Priority Assignment in Waiting Line Problems , 1954, Oper. Res..

[45]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Modeling bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[46]  Shaocheng Qu,et al.  The statistical research of human dynamics on correspondence , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control.

[47]  Raj Kumar Pan,et al.  Time-varying priority queuing models for human dynamics. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  R. Dean Malmgren,et al.  Log-normal statistics in e-mail communication patterns , 2008 .

[49]  G Caldarelli,et al.  Invasion percolation on a tree and queueing models. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[50]  B Kahng,et al.  Priority queues with bursty arrivals of incoming tasks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.