Anthropomorphization of artificial agents leads to fair and strategic, but not altruistic behavior

Abstract With robots playing an increasing role in our daily lives, our emotional responses to them have become an active subject of study. The process of anthropomorphization, ascribing human affordances to non-human objects, is thought to play a large role in human-robot interaction. However, earlier studies have relied largely on experimenter’s manipulation of anthropomorphism, and the use of virtual robots. The aim of this study was to investigate peopleâs fairness preference and strategic and altruistic behavior toward different opponents (a human, a semi-humanoid and a spider-like robot, and a laptop) in two economic games. Anthropomorphization questionnaires and mood measures were also administered. Our findings suggest that fairness preference and strategic behavior are not predicted by the opponent’s physical appearance, but instead predicted by individual differences in the tendency to anthropomorphize others. Altruistic behavior, on the other hand, is affected by the opponent’s physical appearance.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[2]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  The brooms in fantasia: Neural correlates of anthropomorphizing objects , 2008 .

[3]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[4]  W. Killgore,et al.  The Affect Grid: A Moderately Valid, Nonspecific Measure of Pleasure and Arousal , 1998, Psychological reports.

[5]  Elena Torta,et al.  The Ultimatum Game as Measurement Tool for Anthropomorphism in Human-Robot Interaction , 2013, ICSR.

[6]  Axel Franzen,et al.  The external validity of giving in the dictator game , 2012 .

[7]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The Art of Designing Socially Intelligent Agents: Science, Fiction, and the Human in the Loop , 1998, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[8]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Who Sees Human? , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[9]  T. Nagel.  Mortal Questions: What is it like to be a bat? , 2012 .

[10]  van Et Els Dijk,et al.  Investigating rejection behavior in the ultimatum game as a measure of anthropomorphism , 2013 .

[11]  M. Mori.  THE UNCANNY VALLEY , 2020, The Monster Theory Reader.

[12]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[14]  C. Engel.  Dictator games: a meta study , 2010 .

[15]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.

[16]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Social Brain Hypothesis , 1998, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[17]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[18]  Peter Robinson,et al.  How anthropomorphism affects empathy toward robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  C. Frith,et al.  Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  BEING FAIR OR APPEARING FAIR: STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING , 1995 .

[21]  Laura Moretti,et al.  Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions. , 2010, Emotion.

[22]  Daniel Campbell-Meiklejohn,et al.  Social Factors and Preference Change , 2012 .

[23]  N. Bardsley.  Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? , 2008 .

[24]  Ralph Adolphs,et al.  Impaired spontaneous anthropomorphizing despite intact perception and social knowledge. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism--Experimental Evidence and New Theories. , 2005 .

[26]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Affect grid : A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal , 1989 .

[27]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: when one into one equals oneness. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[29]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  C. Batson.  The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[31]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics , 1986 .

[32]  H. Oosterbeek,et al.  Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[33]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games , 1996 .

[34]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[35]  John A. List,et al.  Stakes Matter in Ultimatum Games , 2011 .

[36]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  In Search of the Uncanny Valley , 2009, UCMedia.