From CAATTs Adoption to Continuous Auditing Systems Implementation: An Analysis Based on Organizational Routines Theories

Previous studies on the use of computer assisted auditing technology and techniques (CAATTs) mostly focus on computer skills and perceived usefulness of auditors, and the influential factors from organizational environments; however, they seldom emphasize the group level. In this research, we study the technological adaptation process of a case company, which continuously implemented four CAATTs projects in three years. We summarized and analyzed the routinization process of how the case company adapted their computer-aided audit procedures from an experimental action to daily usage. An approach based on organizational routines theories was adopted to study group learning and interactions among project members, and to understand how they integrated automated auditing techniques and mechanisms into the existing manual auditing procedures. The process also reveals the incremental progress of an emerging routine from CAATTs adoption to continuous auditing systems.The research results show that the documentation of CAATTs projects and group learning among different functions contribute to the routinization of automated auditing procedures; the continuous auditing system based on the automated auditing program also contributes to routinely audited tasks. However, the improvisational nature of auditing activities, implicit characteristics within general auditing software, and rigidity of automatic auditing programs cause the resistance of auditors on CAATTs use, and also impede the emergence and flexibility of computer-aided auditing procedures.

[1]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[2]  Nurmazilah Mahzan,et al.  Adoption of Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques (CAATTs) by Internal Auditors: Current issues in the UK , 2008 .

[3]  Rick Elam,et al.  Continuous auditing: the audit of the future , 2001 .

[4]  Shi-Ming Huang,et al.  Developing A Continuous Auditing Assistance System Based on Information Process Models , 2007, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Barbara D. Klein User Perceptions of Data Quality: Internet and Traditional Text Sources , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[6]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations , 2011 .

[7]  Shi-Ming Huang,et al.  Examining the determinants of computer-assisted audit techniques acceptance from internal auditors' viewpoints , 2008, Int. J. Serv. Stand..

[8]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[9]  Patrick Wolf,et al.  Towards Audit 2.0 - A Web 2.0 Community Platform for Auditors , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[11]  Jerry Julian,et al.  How Project Management Office Leaders Facilitate Cross-Project Learning and Continuous Improvement , 2008 .

[12]  Anish Bhimani,et al.  Securing the commercial Internet , 1996, CACM.

[13]  David C. Yen,et al.  Auditing in the e-commerce era , 2004, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[14]  Paul E. Lindow,et al.  Beyond Traditional Audit Techniques , 2002 .

[15]  Diane J. Janvrin,et al.  Acceptance of Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques , 2008 .

[16]  Alan T. Lord ISACA model curricula 2004 , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Audit Automation for Implementing Continuous Auditing: Principles and Problems , 2008 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[19]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[20]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[21]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[22]  Michael X Cohen Individual Learning and Organizational Routine: Emerging Connections , 1991 .

[23]  Roger Debreceny,et al.  Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector: Challenges and opportunities , 2005 .

[24]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  Applying Organizational Routines in understanding organizational change , 2005 .

[25]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[26]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Continuous Online Auditing: A Program of Research , 1999, J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Marcia L. Weidenmier,et al.  CHAPTER 9 THE PERVASIVE IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON INTERNAL AUDITING , 2004 .

[28]  Jon B. Woodroof,et al.  Continuous audit: the motivations, benefits, problems, and challenges identified by partners of a Big 4 accounting firm , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[29]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Principles and Problems of Audit Automation as a Precursor to Continuous Auditing , 2009 .

[30]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[31]  R. Rice,et al.  Book Reviews : Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution from Word Processing to Office Information Systems , 1987 .

[32]  R. Elliott,et al.  Twenty-First Century Assurance , 2002 .

[33]  Carol E. Brown,et al.  A Review and Analysis of the Existing Research Streams in Continuous Auditing , 2007 .

[34]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[35]  Bernard Kamsu-Foguem,et al.  Knowledge formalization in experience feedback processes: An ontology-based approach , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[36]  J. Dutton,et al.  Treating Progress Functions as a Managerial Opportunity , 1984 .

[37]  Rutgers Business School,et al.  CONTINUOUS AUDITING : THE USA EXPERIENCE AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN BRAZIL , 2006 .

[38]  Sharon Burnett The Future of Accounting Education: A Regional Perspective , 2003 .

[39]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[40]  Stewart A. Leech,et al.  Audit support systems and decision aids: Current practice and opportunities for future research , 2007, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Frederick Gallegos,et al.  Is Audit Training Needs for the 21ST Century: A Selected Assessment , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[42]  K. Lewin,et al.  Group decision and social change. , 1999 .

[43]  She-I Chang,et al.  The Development of a Computer Auditing System Sufficient for Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404— A Study on the Purchasing and Expenditure Cycle of the ERP System , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[44]  Robert L. Braun,et al.  Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives , 2003 .

[45]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Feasibility and Economics of Continuous Assurance , 2002 .