Dynamic approximation method for removal function size in magnetorheological finishing

Abstract. In magnetorheological finishing (MRF), predicting the size of a removal function plays an important role in determining the efficiency of optical material removal. The size of the removal function can be adjusted for different immersion depths of optical parts into the MRF ribbon, which enables the development of multiple MRF-processing algorithms: dwell-time calculation, path planning, or dynamic control of MRF instruments. However, few methods for such algorithms have been developed to dynamically approximate the size of removal functions with respect to various immersion depths. Thus, the ability to dynamically approximate the size of the MRF removal function is indeed of significance. A dynamic approximation method is designed after analyzing the generation mechanism of removal function and its size; establishing the equations for size, which are further numerically analyzed and simplified for common MRF configurations; and approximating the length and width of removal function dynamically. The approximation accuracy is verified through experimental tests where UBK7 optical parts are polished on a PKC1000-Q2 MRF installation. It is revealed that the approximation errors for the length and width are less than 6% and 8%, respectively.

[1]  Yang Wang,et al.  Dwell time algorithm based on the optimization theory for magnetorheological finishing , 2010, International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies (AOMATT).

[2]  Shi Feng Research on Process Optimization of Magnetorheological Finishing Basing on Predictive Model of Removal Function , 2009 .

[3]  Fan Wu,et al.  High-accuracy process based on the corrective calibration of removal function in the magnetorheological finishing , 2017 .

[4]  K. Saraswathamma Magnetorheological Finishing: A Review , 2013 .

[5]  William Kordonski,et al.  Magnetorheological finishing (MRF) in commercial precision optics manufacturing , 1999, Optics + Photonics.

[6]  Ci Song,et al.  Calibration and prediction of removal function in magnetorheological finishing. , 2010, Applied optics.

[7]  D. S. Bailey,et al.  Assessment and mitigation of radiation, EMP, debris & shrapnel impacts at megajoule-class laser facilities , 2010 .

[8]  John C. Lambropoulos,et al.  Use of magnetorheological finishing (MRF) to relieve residual stress and subsurface damage on lapped semiconductor silicon wafers , 2001, Optics + Photonics.

[9]  Andreas Tünnermann,et al.  Fabrication of high precision metallic freeform mirrors with magnetorheological finishing (MRF) , 2013, Other Conferences.

[10]  Rolf Rascher,et al.  Utilisation of time-variant influence functions in the computer controlled polishing , 2008 .

[11]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Optimization of the Removal Function of Dual-Rotation Magnetorheological Finishing , 2016 .

[12]  Jian Cheng,et al.  Model of the material removal function and an experimental study on a magnetorheological finishing process using a small ball-end permanent-magnet polishing head. , 2017, Applied optics.

[13]  朱日宏 Zhu Rihong,et al.  Polishing parameters of magnetorheological finishing for high precision optical components , 2013 .

[14]  Stephen D. Jacobs,et al.  Precision optics fabrication using magnetorheological finishing , 1997, Optics + Photonics.