A Latent Class Accelerated Hazard Model of Social Activity Duration

Over the past decade, activity scheduling processes have gained increasing attention in the field of transportation research. However, still little is known about the scheduling of social activities and the influence of the characteristics of the persons with whom these activities take place. This paper contributes to this knowledge. We analyze how the duration of social activities is influenced by personal and household characteristics, social activity characteristics and characteristics of the contacted person(s). To that end, a latent class accelerated hazard model is estimated, based on social interaction diary data that was collected in the Netherlands in 2008. Findings suggest that especially the social activity characteristics and the characteristics of the contacted person are highly significant in explaining social activity duration. This shows that social activities should not be considered as a homogenous set of activities and it underlines the importance of including the social context in travel-behavior models. Moreover, the results indicate that there is a substantial amount of latent heterogeneity across the population. The three latent classes show different constants, with considerably shorter durations for one of the classes, and different effects for all three categories of explanatory variables.

[1]  Eric Cornelis,et al.  Travel and activity time allocation: An empirical comparison between eight cities in Europe , 2011 .

[2]  A. Páez,et al.  Social Influence on Travel Behavior: A Simulation Example of the Decision to Telecommute , 2007 .

[3]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[4]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Computer Simulation of Household Activity Scheduling , 1998 .

[5]  K. Axhausen,et al.  A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE WEEKLY HOUSEHOLD ACTIVITY/TRAVEL SCHEDULING PROCESS. IN: TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR: SPATIAL PATTERNS, CONGESTION AND MODELLING , 2002 .

[6]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A hazard-based duration model of shopping activity with nonparametric baseline specification and nonparametric control for unobserved heterogeneity , 1996 .

[7]  William H. Greene,et al.  NLOGIT version 3.0 : reference guide , 2002 .

[8]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[9]  Hjp Harry Timmermans,et al.  Social Commitments and Activity-Travel Scheduling Decisions , 2006 .

[10]  Tracy L. M. Kennedy,et al.  Connected Lives: The Project1 , 2006 .

[11]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  The social dimension in action : A multilevel, personal networks model of social activity frequency between individuals , 2009 .

[12]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[13]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Recent Developments in Network Measurement , 2005 .

[14]  A. Páez,et al.  Travel behavior within Canada’s older population: a cohort analysis , 2005 .

[15]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach , 2006 .

[16]  A. Bowling,et al.  Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension , 2004 .

[17]  Susan L Handy,et al.  The Impacts of Ict on leisure Activities and Travel: A Conceptual Exploration , 2006 .

[18]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[19]  Ta Theo Arentze,et al.  Social networks, ICT use and activity-travel patterns. Data collection and first analyses , 2008 .

[20]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[21]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  INTERSHOPPING DURATION: AN ANALYSIS USING MULTIWEEK DATA , 2002 .

[22]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  HAZARD-BASED DURATION MODELS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO TRANSPORT ANALYSIS. , 1994 .

[23]  Harry Timmermans,et al.  A Latent Class Accelerated Hazard Model of Activity Episode Durations , 2007 .

[24]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[25]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Social Context of Activity Scheduling , 2008 .

[26]  J. Hausman,et al.  Flexible parametric estimation of duration and competing risk models , 1990 .

[27]  Dick Ettema,et al.  COMPETING RISK HAZARD MODEL OF ACTIVITY CHOICE, TIMING, SEQUENCING, AND DURATION , 1995 .

[28]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Analysis of activity duration using the Puget sound transportation panel , 2000 .

[29]  B. Wellman,et al.  How Far and with Whom Do People Socialize? , 2008 .

[30]  Alain Degenne,et al.  Introducing Social Networks , 1999 .

[31]  John Urry,et al.  Social networks, travel and talk. , 2003, The British journal of sociology.

[32]  Steven Farber,et al.  My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation , 2009 .

[33]  T. Arentze,et al.  Social Networks, Social Interactions, and Activity-Travel Behavior: A Framework for Microsimulation , 2008 .

[34]  Yang-chih Fu,et al.  Contact Diaries , 2007 .

[35]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: An empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects , 2005 .

[36]  Harry J. P. Timmermans,et al.  Unconditional and conditional competing risk models of activity duration and activity sequencing decisions: An empirical comparison , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[37]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Structures of Leisure Travel: Temporal and Spatial Variability , 2004 .

[38]  David M Levinson,et al.  Contacts and Meetings: Location, Duration and Distance Traveled , 2009 .

[39]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Social networks and travel: Some hypotheses , 2003 .

[40]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Modelling the frequency of contacts in a shrunken world , 2008 .