Fungal Glycoside Hydrolases Display Unique Specificities for Polysaccharides and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms

Commercially available cellulases and amylases can disperse the pathogenic bacteria embedded in biofilms. This suggests that polysaccharide-degrading enzymes would be useful as antibacterial therapies to aid the treatment of biofilm-associated bacteria, e.g., in chronic wounds. Using a published enzyme library, we explored the capacity of 76 diverse recombinant glycoside hydrolases to disperse Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Four of the 76 recombinant glycoside hydrolases digested purified cellulose, amylose, or pectin. However, these enzymes did not disperse biofilms, indicating that anti-biofilm activity is not general to all glycoside hydrolases and that biofilm activity cannot be predicted from the activity on pure substrates. Only one of the 76 recombinant enzymes was detectably active in biofilm dispersion, an α-xylosidase from Aspergillus nidulans. An α-xylosidase cloned subsequently from Aspergillus thermomutatus likewise demonstrated antibiofilm activity, suggesting that α-xylosidases, in general, can disperse Staphylococcus biofilms. Surprisingly, neither of the two β-xylosidases in the library degraded biofilms. Commercial preparations of amylase and cellulase that are known to be effective in the dispersion of Staphylococcus biofilms were also analyzed. The commercial cellulase contained contaminating proteins with multiple enzymes exhibiting biofilm-dispersing activity. Successfully prospecting for additional antibiofilm enzymes may thus require large libraries and may benefit from purified enzymes. The complexity of biofilms and the diversity of glycoside hydrolases continue to make it difficult to predict or understand the enzymes that could have future therapeutic applications.

[1]  S. K. Pandian,et al.  Evaluation of antibiofilm potential of four-domain α-amylase from Streptomyces griseus against exopolysaccharides (EPS) of bacterial pathogens using Danio rerio , 2022, Archives of Microbiology.

[2]  N. Høiby,et al.  Tolerance and resistance of microbial biofilms , 2022, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[3]  A. Ardebili,et al.  In vitro activities of cellulase and ceftazidime, alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms , 2021, BMC microbiology.

[4]  A. Kadam,et al.  Efficient Biofilms Eradication by Enzymatic-Cocktail of Pancreatic Protease Type-I and Bacterial α-Amylase , 2020, Polymers.

[5]  K. Rumbaugh,et al.  Differential Efficacy of Glycoside Hydrolases to Disperse Biofilms , 2020, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.

[6]  K. Rumbaugh,et al.  Biofilm dispersion , 2020, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[7]  K. Rumbaugh How well are we translating biofilm research from bench-side to bedside? , 2020, Biofilm.

[8]  S. Soni,et al.  A novel multi-enzyme preparation produced from Aspergillus niger using biodegradable waste: a possible option to combat heterogeneous biofilms , 2020, AMB Express.

[9]  G. Phillips,et al.  Crystal Structure of α-Xylosidase from Aspergillus niger in Complex with a Hydrolyzed Xyloglucan Product and New Insights in Accurately Predicting Substrate Specificities of GH31 Family Glycosidases , 2020, ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering.

[10]  C. Cugini,et al.  The Role of Exopolysaccharides in Oral Biofilms , 2019, Journal of dental research.

[11]  M. Granick,et al.  Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS)-degrading enzymes reduce staphylococcal surface attachment and biocide resistance on pig skin in vivo , 2018, PloS one.

[12]  K. Rumbaugh,et al.  The Consequences of Biofilm Dispersal on the Host , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Carla C. C. R. de Carvalho Marine Biofilms: A Successful Microbial Strategy With Economic Implications , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[14]  L. Cegelski,et al.  Phosphoethanolamine cellulose: A naturally produced chemically modified cellulose , 2018, Science.

[15]  K. Rumbaugh,et al.  Approaches to Dispersing Medical Biofilms , 2017, Microorganisms.

[16]  K. Rumbaugh,et al.  Glycoside Hydrolases Degrade Polymicrobial Bacterial Biofilms in Wounds , 2016, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[17]  Philipp Stiefel,et al.  Enzymes Enhance Biofilm Removal Efficiency of Cleaners , 2016, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[18]  K. Sauer,et al.  Escaping the biofilm in more than one way: desorption, detachment or dispersion. , 2016, Current opinion in microbiology.

[19]  Pedro M. Coutinho,et al.  The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013 , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  H. Brumer,et al.  Structural and enzymatic characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 31 α-xylosidase from Cellvibrio japonicus involved in xyloglucan saccharification. , 2011, The Biochemical journal.

[21]  A. Kristjuhan,et al.  Extraction of genomic DNA from yeasts for PCR-based applications. , 2011, BioTechniques.

[22]  P. Stewart,et al.  Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time- dependent therapeutic window. , 2010, Journal of wound care.

[23]  P. Watnick,et al.  Signals, Regulatory Networks, and Materials That Build and Break Bacterial Biofilms , 2009, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[24]  S. Dowd,et al.  In vitro multispecies Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model , 2008, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[25]  Brandi L. Cantarel,et al.  The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  G. Donelli,et al.  Synergistic Activity of Dispersin B and Cefamandole Nafate in Inhibition of Staphylococcal Biofilm Growth on Polyurethanes , 2007, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[27]  C. Somerville,et al.  Development and application of a suite of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes for analyzing plant cell walls. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. Okuyama,et al.  Structural elements to convert Escherichia coli α‐xylosidase (YicI) into α‐glucosidase , 2006 .

[29]  C. Somerville,et al.  Cloning, expression, and characterization of an oligoxyloglucan reducing end-specific xyloglucanobiohydrolase from Aspergillus nidulans. , 2005, Carbohydrate research.

[30]  S. Withers,et al.  Mechanistic and Structural Analysis of a Family 31 α-Glycosidase and Its Glycosyl-enzyme Intermediate* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  Matthew R. Parsek,et al.  Alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of PA14 and PAO1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  D. Allison,et al.  The Biofilm Matrix , 2003, Biofouling.

[33]  Melanie Loiselle,et al.  The Use of Cellulase in Inhibiting Biofilm Formation from Organisms Commonly Found on Medical Implants , 2003, Biofouling.

[34]  J. Sampedro,et al.  Cloning and expression pattern of a gene encoding an alpha-xylosidase active against xyloglucan oligosaccharides from Arabidopsis. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[35]  F. Tjerneld,et al.  Softwood hemicellulose-degrading enzymes from Aspergillus niger: purification and properties of a beta-mannanase. , 1998, Journal of biotechnology.

[36]  R. Hengge,et al.  Cellulose in Bacterial Biofilms , 2019, Biologically-Inspired Systems.

[37]  James D Bryers,et al.  Medical biofilms. , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  D. Botstein,et al.  Plasmid construction by homologous recombination in yeast. , 1987, Gene.