Digital dermoscopy analysis and artificial neural network for the differentiation of clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions: a retrospective study.

Noninvasive diagnostic methods such as dermoscopy or epiluminescence light microscopy have been developed in an attempt to improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented skin lesions. The evaluation of the many morphologic characteristics of pigmented skin lesions observable by epiluminescence light microscopy, however, is often extremely complex and subjective. With the aim of obviating these problems of qualitative interpretation, methods based on mathematical analysis of pigmented skin lesions have recently been designed. These methods are based on computerized analysis of digital images obtained by epiluminescence light microscopy. In this study we used a digital dermoscopy analyzer with 147 clinically atypical pigmented skin lesions (90 nevi and 57 melanomas) to determine its discriminating power with respect to histologic diagnosis. The system evaluated 48 objective parameters used to train an artificial neural network. Using the artificial neural network with 10 variables selected by a stepwise procedure, we obtained a maximum accuracy in distinguishing melanoma from benign lesions of about 93%. Comparing this result with those of the many studies using classical epiluminescence light microscopy, it emerges that the method proposed is equal or even superior in diagnostic accuracy and has the advantage of not depending on the expertise of the clinician who examines the lesion.

[1]  R. B. Goudie,et al.  UNSTABLE MUTATIONS IN VITILIGO , 1980, The Lancet.

[2]  N Cascinelli,et al.  A possible new tool for clinical diagnosis of melanoma: the computer. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  Josef Smolle,et al.  EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF MALIGNANT MELANOMA BY SURFACE MICROSCOPY , 1987, The Lancet.

[4]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Effects of Sample Size in Classifier Design , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  J Smolle,et al.  Terminology in surface microscopy. Consensus meeting of the Committee on Analytical Morphology of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Forschung, Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany, Nov. 17, 1989. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  E. R. Farmer,et al.  NIH Consensus conference. Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma. , 1992, JAMA.

[7]  Gary S. Rogers,et al.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Melanoma: NIH Consensus Development Panel on Early Melanoma , 1992 .

[8]  W. Stolz,et al.  The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[9]  R. H. Moss,et al.  Neural network diagnosis of malignant melanoma from color images , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  M. Binder,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy. A useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[11]  Mads Hintz-madsen,et al.  Detection of Malignant Melanoma using Neural Classifiers , 1996 .

[12]  B. Schenker,et al.  Cross-validated structure selection for neural networks , 1996 .

[13]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural networks expand SP's horizons , 1996, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[14]  Hugues Talbot,et al.  Automated Instrumentation for the Diagnosis of Invasive Melanoma: Image Analysis of Oil Epiluminescence Microscopy , 1997 .

[15]  Epiluminescence microscopy in clinical diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions? , 1997, The Lancet.

[16]  C. Metz,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  H Kerl,et al.  Sensitivity in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma , 1994, Melanoma research.

[18]  G Pellacani,et al.  Digital videomicroscopy improves diagnostic accuracy for melanoma. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[19]  P Barbini,et al.  Digital dermoscopy analysis for the differentiation of atypical nevi and early melanoma: a new quantitative semiology. , 1999, Archives of dermatology.

[20]  Reproducibility of a dermoscopic method (7FFM) for the diagnosis of malignant melanoma. , 2000, European journal of dermatology : EJD.

[21]  H. Kittler,et al.  Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[22]  S. Menzies,et al.  Increase in the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis by primary care physicians using skin surface microscopy , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[23]  Antonio Daponte,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of epiluminescence microscopy: evaluation on a sample of 2731 excised cutaneous pigmented lesions , 2000 .

[24]  M. Oliviero,et al.  Automatic differentiation of melanoma from melanocytic nevi with multispectral digital dermoscopy: a feasibility study. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[25]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for the Diagnosis of Pigmented Skin Lesions , 2001, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[26]  G. Cevenini,et al.  Differentiation between pigmented Spitz naevus and melanoma by digital dermoscopy and stepwise logistic discriminant analysis , 2001, Melanoma research.