A retrospective study of the outcome of cesarean section for women with severe pre-eclampsia in a third world setting

Objective: To compare the outcome of subarachnoid block (spinal anesthesia) and general anesthesia in Cesarean delivery for women with severe pre-eclampsia. Methods: A retrospective study of women with severe pre-eclampsia requiring Cesarean section from January 2005 to June 2009 was carried out. Maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, booking status, Apgar scores, maternal and perinatal mortality of the sub-arachnoid block group were compared with those of general anesthesia group using χ2, Student t-test and Fischer exact test. Results: There were no significant difference between the two groups in overall maternal mortality (5.4% vs. 11.9%, P=0.5) and perinatal mortality (2.7% vs. 11.9%, P=0.15). The general anesthesia group had significantly more birth asphyxia than the spinal group (55.9% vs. 27.0%, P=0.0006). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the maternal and perinatal mortality outcome of cesarean delivery between women with severe pre-eclampsia who had regional anesthesia and those that had general anesthesia. There was significantly higher proportion of birth asphyxia in babies of women who received general anesthesia.

[1]  Whitney You,et al.  Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia , 2008 .

[2]  F. Stüber,et al.  [Spinal and epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section in patients with pre-eclampsia]. , 2007, Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS.

[3]  A. Yli-Hankala,et al.  Maternal haemodynamics in pre‐eclampsia compared with normal pregnancy during caesarean delivery , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  F. Akercan,et al.  Epidural versus spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in preeclamptic patients , 2005, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  P. Middleton,et al.  Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  M. Mansor,et al.  Retrospective review of spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section in preeclamptic patients. , 2003, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[7]  R. Gratton,et al.  Obstetrical intervention rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with gestational hypertension. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  E. Masson,et al.  Long-term sexual co-habitation offers no protection from hypertensive disease of pregnancy. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[9]  J. Martin,et al.  Cardiopulmonary Morbidity as a Complication of Severe Preeclampsia HELLP Syndrome , 2000, Journal of Perinatology.

[10]  K. Leveno,et al.  Randomized Comparison of General and Regional Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Pregnancies Complicated by Severe Preeclampsia , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.