Choice stepping response and transfer times: effects of age, fall risk, and secondary tasks.

BACKGROUND Deterioration with age of physiological components of balance control increases fall risk. Avoiding a fall can also require higher level cognitive processing to select correct motor and stepping responses. Here we investigate how a competing cognitive task and an obstacle to stepping affect the initiation and execution phases of choice stepping reaction times in young and older people. METHODS Three groups were studied: young persons (YOUNG: 23-40 years, n = 20), older persons with a low risk of falls (OLR: 75-86 years, n = 18), and older persons with a high risk of falls (OHR: 78-88 years, n = 22). Four conditions were examined: choice stepping, choice stepping + obstacle, choice stepping + working memory task, and choice stepping + working memory task + obstacle. Step response and transfer times were measured for each condition, in addition to hesitant stepping, contacts with the obstacle and errors made in the memory test. RESULTS Older participant groups had significantly longer response and transfer times than the young group had, and the OHR group had significantly longer response and transfer times than the OLR group had. There was a significant Group x Secondary task interaction for response time (F(2,215) = 12.6, p <.001). With the memory task, response time was minimally affected in the YOUNG (7% increase, p =.11) but was slowed significantly in the OLR fallers (42% increase, p <.001) and more so in the OHR fallers (48% increase, p <.001). The obstacle had a small but significant effect on response time (9.4%) and a larger effect on transfer time (43.3%), with no differences among the groups. Errors in stepping, performing the secondary task and contacting the obstacle increased with age and fall risk. CONCLUSIONS Compared with young people, older people, and more so those at risk of falling, have an impaired ability to initiate and execute quick, accurate voluntary steps, particularly in situations where attention is divided.

[1]  I. Melzer,et al.  Age-Related Changes of Postural Control: Effect of Cognitive Tasks , 2001, Gerontology.

[2]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[3]  Verbaken Jh,et al.  Population norms for edge contrast sensitivity. , 1986 .

[4]  B. E. Maki,et al.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[5]  C. Bard,et al.  Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  A M Wing,et al.  Age differences in postural stability are increased by additional cognitive demands. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[7]  Charles Hall,et al.  Validity of Divided Attention Tasks In Predicting Falls in Older Individuals: A Preliminary Study , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Dual‐tasking effects on gait variability: The role of aging, falls, and executive function , 2006, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[9]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Do anticipatory postural adjustments precede compensatory stepping reactions evoked by perturbation? , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  S R Lord,et al.  Choice stepping reaction time: a composite measure of falls risk in older people. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[11]  L. Brooks.  The Suppression of Visualization by Reading , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  D. Winter,et al.  Trajectory of the body COG and COP during initiation and termination of gait , 1993 .

[13]  D. Jahnigen,et al.  Modeling Recovery from Stumbles: Preliminary Data on Variable Selection and Classification Efficacy , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  James A Ashton-Miller,et al.  Age differences in timed accurate stepping with increasing cognitive and visual demand: a walking trail making test. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[15]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[16]  K. Hill,et al.  Reliability and Validity of a Dual‐Task Force Platform Assessment of Balance Performance: Effect of Age, Balance Impairment, and Cognitive Task , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  A J van den Bogert,et al.  Response time is more important than walking speed for the ability of older adults to avoid a fall after a trip. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  H. Menz,et al.  A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[19]  A B Schultz,et al.  Stepping over obstacles: dividing attention impairs performance of old more than young adults. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[20]  B. Kerr,et al.  Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The interacting effects of cognitive demand and recovery of postural stability in balance-impaired elderly persons. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[22]  E. McAuley,et al.  Gait adjustments in older adults: activity and efficacy influences. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[23]  Mark W Rogers,et al.  Triggering of protective stepping for the control of human balance: age and contextual dependence. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Klaus Hauer,et al.  Cognitive Impairment Decreases Postural Control During Dual Tasks in Geriatric Patients with a History of Severe Falls , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  S. Lord,et al.  Sit-to-stand performance depends on sensation, speed, balance, and psychological status in addition to strength in older people. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[26]  Itshak Melzer,et al.  The Effect of a Cognitive Task on Voluntary Step Execution in Healthy Elderly and Young Individuals , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[27]  William H. Gage,et al.  The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  G. L. Pellecchia,et al.  Postural sway increases with attentional demands of concurrent cognitive task. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[29]  M. Woollacott,et al.  The influence of a concurrent cognitive task on the compensatory stepping response to a perturbation in balance-impaired and healthy elders. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[30]  E. Pfeiffer.  A Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire for the Assessment of Organic Brain Deficit in Elderly Patients † , 1975, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[31]  W. Gage,et al.  Is the prioritization of postural control altered in conditions of postural threat in younger and older adults? , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[32]  B. E. Maki,et al.  A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[33]  S. Lord,et al.  Physiological Factors Associated with Falls in Older Community‐Dwelling Women , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.