Data-driven Robust Scoring Approach for Driver Profiling Applications

Driving behavior profiling has important relevance in many driving applications. For instance, car insurance companies have been recently applying a new insurance paradigm in which a driver's insurance premium is adapted based on realtime driving behavior. Driver profiling process is composed of two sub processes. The first is the detection of certain driving behaviors by acquiring data from onboard devices such as smartphones and OBDII units, whereas the second is the scoring process in which the detected behaviors are used to measure the actual driving risk. The scoring process has been viewed as an intricate problem due to the lack of reliable and large-scale datasets that can provide statistically trustworthy insights. This paper presents a data-driven approach for calculating a driver's risk score by utilizing the SHRP2 naturalistic driving dataset, which is the largest dataset of its kind to date. Two machine learning algorithms, which are support vector regression (SVR) and decision tree regression (DTR) are trained to reflect a driver's score. Driver's score is quantified in terms of the additive inverse of the predicted risk probability. After data filtering and preprocessing, models are trained using thirteen predictors, which represent twelve unique driving behaviors and the total driving time per driver. Validation results show that risk probability can be accurately predicted using the proposed models.

[1]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[2]  Isaac Skog,et al.  Insurance Telematics: Opportunities and Challenges with the Smartphone Solution , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[3]  Thierry Derrmann,et al.  Driver Behavior Profiling Using Smartphones: A Low-Cost Platform for Driver Monitoring , 2015, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[4]  Lorenzo Torresani,et al.  CarSafe: a driver safety app that detects dangerous driving behavior using dual-cameras on smartphones , 2012, UbiComp.

[5]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[6]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Driver Behavior Classification in Crash and Near-Crash Events Using 100-CAR Naturalistic Data Set , 2017, GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[7]  T. G. Brown,et al.  The effect of age on the personality and cognitive characteristics of three distinct risky driving offender groups , 2017 .

[8]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  On the Effect of Traffic and Road Conditions on the Drivers’ Behavior: A Statistical Analysis , 2018, 2018 14th International Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC).

[9]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Driver Behavior Classification at Intersections and Validation on Large Naturalistic Data Set , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Joseph W. Newman State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. , 1957 .

[11]  Saswata Sahoo,et al.  Hidden Markov Model based driving event detection and driver profiling from mobile inertial sensor data , 2015, 2015 IEEE SENSORS.

[12]  Yoshihiko Suhara,et al.  Driver behavior profiling: An investigation with different smartphone sensors and machine learning , 2017, PloS one.

[13]  Jonathan M. Hankey,et al.  Description of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Database and the Crash, Near-Crash, and Baseline Data Sets , 2016 .

[14]  Chirabrata Bhaumik,et al.  MobiDriveScore — A system for mobile sensor based driving analysis: A risk assessment model for improving one's driving , 2013, 2013 Seventh International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST).