Evaluation of Various Pulse-Decay Laboratory Permeability Measurement Techniques for Highly Stressed Coals

The transient technique for laboratory permeability measurement, proposed by Brace et al. (J Geophys Res 73:2225–2236, 1968) and widely used for conventional gas reservoir rocks, is the preferred method when testing low-permeability rocks in the laboratory. However, Brace et al.’s solution leads to considerable errors since it does not take into account compressive storage and sorption effect when applied to sorptive rocks, such as, coals and shales. To verify the applicability of this solution when used to characterize fluid flow behavior of coal, an in-depth investigation of permeability evolution for flow of helium and methane depletion was conducted for San Juan coals using the pressure pulse-decay method under best replicated in situ conditions. Three permeability solutions, Brace et al.’s (1968), Dicker and Smits’s (International meeting on petroleum engineering, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1988) and Cui et al.’s (Geofluids 9:208–223, 2009), were utilized to establish the permeability trends. Both helium and methane permeability results exhibited very small difference between the Brace et al.’s solution and Dicker and Smits’s solution, indicating that the effect of compressive storage is negligible. However, methane permeability enhancement at low pressures due to coal matrix shrinkage resulting from gas desorption can be significant and this was observed in pressure response plots and the estimated permeability values using Cui et al.’s solution only. Therefore, it is recommended that Cui et al.’s solution be employed to correctly include the sorption effect when testing coal permeability using the transient technique. A series of experiments were also carried out to establish the stress-dependent permeability trend under constant effective stress condition, and then quantify the sole contribution of the sorption effect on permeability variation. By comparison with the laboratory data obtained under in situ stress/strain condition, it was verified that accelerated CBM production can be achieved by reducing the horizontal stresses.

[1]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  Permeability of granite under high pressure , 1968 .

[2]  Shimin Liu,et al.  Determination of the Effective Stress Law for Deformation in Coalbed Methane Reservoirs , 2014, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[3]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2010 .

[4]  H. Sutherland,et al.  Argon gas permeability of new mexico rock salt under hydrostatic compression , 1980 .

[5]  A. I. Dicker,et al.  A Practical Approach for Determining Permeability From Laboratory Pressure-Pulse Decay Measurements , 1988 .

[6]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane, recovery , 2005 .

[7]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams , 2005 .

[8]  Shimin Liu ESTIMATION OF DIFFERENT COAL COMPRESSIBILITIES OF COALBED METHANE RESERVOIRS UNDER REPLICATED IN SITU CONDITION , 2012 .

[9]  E. Robertson Measurement and Modeling of Sorption-Induced Strain and Permeability Changes in Coal , 2005 .

[10]  The Experimental Approach to Effective Stress Law of Coal Mass by Effect of Methane , 2003 .

[11]  Yi Wang,et al.  Laboratory investigations of gas flow behaviors in tight anthracite and evaluation of different pulse-decay methods on permeability estimation , 2015 .

[12]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Laboratory measurement of stress-dependent coal permeability using pulse-decay technique and flow modeling with gas depletion , 2016 .

[13]  I. Langmuir THE ADSORPTION OF GASES ON PLANE SURFACES OF GLASS, MICA AND PLATINUM. , 1918 .

[14]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production: Part 1 – Laboratory results , 2012 .

[15]  J. Aronofsky Effect of Gas Slip on Unsteady Flow of Gas Through Porous Media , 1954 .

[16]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[17]  R. A. Schraufnagel,et al.  Influence of Matrix Shrinkage and Compressibility on Gas Production From Coalbed Methane Reservoirs , 1990 .

[18]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Optimizing enhanced coalbed methane recovery for unhindered production and CO2 injectivity , 2012 .

[19]  R. M. Bustin,et al.  Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications , 2009 .

[20]  Guoliang Chen,et al.  Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal , 1997 .

[21]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Methane/CO2 Sorption Modeling for Coalbed Methane Production and CO2 Sequestration , 2006 .

[22]  W. Lin Compressible fluid flow through rocks of variable permeability , 1977 .

[23]  Shimin Liu,et al.  Evaluation of in situ stress changes with gas depletion of coalbed methane reservoirs , 2014 .

[24]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Predicting Sorption-Induced Strain and Permeability Increase With Depletion for Coalbed-Methane Reservoirs , 2010 .

[25]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  A new theoretical approach to model sorption-induced coal shrinkage or swelling , 2013 .

[26]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  A mechanistic model for permeability evolution in fractured sorbing media , 2012 .

[27]  I. Gray,et al.  Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams , 1987 .

[28]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Permeability evolution during progressive deformation of intact coal and implications for instability in underground coal seams , 2013 .

[29]  Wunan Lin Parametric analyses of the transient method of measuring permeability , 1982 .

[30]  S. C. Jones A Technique for Faster Pulse-Decay Permeability Measurements in Tight Rocks , 1997 .

[31]  Shimin Liu,et al.  Compressibility of sorptive porous media: Part 2. Experimental study on coal , 2014 .

[32]  J. P. Seidle,et al.  Application of Matchstick Geometry To Stress Dependent Permeability in Coals , 1992 .

[33]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Permeability evolution in fractured coal: The roles of fracture geometry and water-content , 2011 .