Higher sensitivity of swab polymerase chain reaction compared with tissue cultures for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) compared with tissue culture as the current gold standard. Methods: Forty-one consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled undergoing revision arthroplasty due to septic and aseptic reasons. Infection classification was done according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Intraoperatively, tissue samples of the periprosthetic membrane were collected for culture analysis, and swabs were taken from the accessible implant surface to perform 16S ribosomal RNA PCR. The diagnostic performance of swab PCR and tissue cultures was determined. Results: Of the 41 patients, 53.7% (n = 22) had a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and 46.3% (n = 19) an aseptic loosening. Swab PCR showed a higher sensitivity than tissue cultures (86.4% vs. 68.2%), while the specificity was equal (89.5%). The area under the curve was 0.79 for tissue cultures and 0.88 for swab PCR. Conclusions: In this first investigation of swab PCR for diagnosing PJI, this procedure revealed a higher sensitivity for diagnosing PJI compared with tissue cultures. Because swab PCR is easily implementable and does not require special equipment, it can potentially improve the diagnosis of PJI.

[1]  T. Sculco,et al.  Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections of the hip and factors determining outcome , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[2]  K. Saleh,et al.  Treating periprosthetic joint infections as biofilms: key diagnosis and management strategies. , 2015, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[3]  R. Trebše,et al.  Identification of the same species in at least two intra-operative samples for prosthetic joint infection diagnostics yields the best results with broad-range polymerase chain reaction , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[4]  Robin Patel,et al.  Low sensitivity of periprosthetic tissue PCR for prosthetic knee infection diagnosis. , 2014, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[5]  B. Giraudeau,et al.  Evaluation of 16S rRNA Gene PCR Sensitivity and Specificity for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: a Prospective Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study , 2014, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  Tomoyuki Saito,et al.  Different diagnostic properties of C-reactive protein, real-time PCR, and histopathology of frozen and permanent sections in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection , 2013, Acta orthopaedica.

[7]  Thomas Bjarnsholt,et al.  Applying insights from biofilm biology to drug development — can a new approach be developed? , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  H. Geiss,et al.  Prosthetic infection: improvement of diagnostic procedures using 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid polymerase chain reaction , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  Rihard Trebše,et al.  Comparison of molecular and culture method in diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. , 2013, FEMS microbiology letters.

[10]  Robin Patel,et al.  Rapid Molecular Microbiologic Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection , 2013, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Swab Cultures Are Not As Effective As Tissue Cultures for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  A. Trampuz,et al.  Multiplex PCR of sonication fluid accurately differentiates between prosthetic joint infection and aseptic failure. , 2012, The Journal of infection.

[13]  Heather N. Watson,et al.  Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  Robin Patel,et al.  Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis Using Broad-Range PCR of Biofilms Dislodged from Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Surfaces Using Sonication , 2012, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[15]  O. Borens,et al.  Epidemiology and New Developments in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection , 2012, The International journal of artificial organs.

[16]  J. Parvizi,et al.  New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  J. Parvizi,et al.  AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. , 2010, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[18]  Á. Soriano,et al.  Blood Culture Flasks for Culturing Synovial Fluid in Prosthetic Joint Infections , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  S. Sporer,et al.  Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Robin Patel,et al.  Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[23]  Paul T. H. Lee,et al.  Polymerase Chain Reaction Can Detect Bacterial DNA in Aseptically Loose Total Hip Arthroplasties , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  R. Darouiche,et al.  Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.