Kriging prediction for manifold-valued random fields

The statistical analysis of data belonging to Riemannian manifolds is becoming increasingly important in many applications, such as shape analysis, diffusion tensor imaging and the analysis of covariance matrices. In many cases, data are spatially distributed but it is not trivial to take into account spatial dependence in the analysis because of the non linear geometry of the manifold. This work proposes a solution to the problem of spatial prediction for manifold valued data, with a particular focus on the case of positive definite symmetric matrices. Under the hypothesis that the dispersion of the observations on the manifold is not too large, data can be projected on a suitably chosen tangent space, where an additive model can be used to describe the relationship between response variable and covariates. Thus, we generalize classical kriging prediction, dealing with the spatial dependence in this tangent space, where well established Euclidean methods can be used. The proposed kriging prediction is applied to the matrix field of covariances between temperature and precipitation in Quebec, Canada.

[1]  Maher Moakher On the Averaging of Symmetric Positive-Definite Tensors , 2006 .

[2]  Claude Manté,et al.  Cokriging for spatial functional data , 2010, J. Multivar. Anal..

[3]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Relationships between precipitation and surface temperature , 2005 .

[4]  Leif Ellingson,et al.  Nonparametric two-sample tests on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds, Cholesky decompositions and Diffusion Tensor Image analysis , 2013, J. Multivar. Anal..

[5]  Piercesare Secchi,et al.  Estimation of the mean for spatially dependent data belonging to a Riemannian manifold , 2012 .

[6]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[8]  Charles C. Taylor,et al.  A comparison of block and semi-parametric bootstrap methods for variance estimation in spatial statistics , 2011, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[9]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  Intrinsic Statistics on Riemannian Manifolds: Basic Tools for Geometric Measurements , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[10]  P. Diggle,et al.  Model‐based geostatistics , 2007 .

[11]  David B. Lobell,et al.  Why are agricultural impacts of climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation , 2008, Environmental Research Letters.

[12]  Jorge Mateu,et al.  Statistics for spatial functional data: some recent contributions , 2009 .

[13]  Piotr Kokoszka,et al.  Estimation and testing for spatially indexed curves with application to ionospheric and magnetic field trends , 2012, 1206.6655.

[14]  J. S. Marron,et al.  Principal arc analysis on direct product manifolds , 2011, 1104.3472.

[15]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Geodesic Regression and the Theory of Least Squares on Riemannian Manifolds , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Maher Moakher,et al.  The Riemannian Geometry of the Space of Positive-Definite Matrices and Its Application to the Regularization of Positive-Definite Matrix-Valued Data , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[17]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[18]  Nadia Baha,et al.  Towards a Real-Time Fall Detection System using Kinect Sensor , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Vis. Image Process..

[19]  I. Dryden,et al.  Non-Euclidean statistics for covariance matrices, with applications to diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, 0910.1656.

[20]  Alessandra Menafoglio,et al.  Kriging for Hilbert-space valued random fields: The operatorial point of view , 2016, J. Multivar. Anal..

[21]  P. Priouret,et al.  Newton's method on Riemannian manifolds: covariant alpha theory , 2002, math/0209096.

[22]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  Bootstrapping correlated data , 1985 .

[23]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[24]  G. Isaac,et al.  Temperature–Precipitation Relationships for Canadian Stations , 1992 .

[25]  D. Freedman,et al.  Bootstrapping a Regression Equation: Some Empirical Results , 1984 .

[26]  Zhizhou Wang,et al.  A constrained variational principle for direct estimation and smoothing of the diffusion tensor field from complex DWI , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  J. Marron,et al.  Object oriented data analysis: Sets of trees , 2007, 0711.3147.

[28]  J. Lieberman,et al.  Intrinsic Regression Models for Medial Representation of Subcortical Structures , 2012, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[29]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  A Riemannian Framework for Tensor Computing , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[30]  Alessandra Menafoglio,et al.  A Universal Kriging predictor for spatially dependent functional data of a Hilbert Space , 2013 .

[31]  Alberto Guadagnini,et al.  A kriging approach based on Aitchison geometry for the characterization of particle-size curves in heterogeneous aquifers , 2014, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[32]  R. Bhattacharya,et al.  Large sample theory of intrinsic and extrinsic sample means on manifolds--II , 2005, math/0507423.

[33]  J. S. Marron,et al.  Local polynomial regression for symmetric positive definite matrices , 2012, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[34]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  Shape from patterns: Regularization , 1988, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[35]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[36]  Piercesare Secchi,et al.  Distances and inference for covariance operators , 2014 .