Applications of stochastic particle models to oceanographic problems

Three Markovian particle models are reviewed, providing a hierarchy of increasingly detailed descriptions of particle motion and dispersion. Model 1 assumes that the scales of turbulent motion are infinitesimal, and it is equivalent to the advection-diffusion equation. Model 2 introduces a finite scale T for the turbulent velocity,, and model 3 introduces an additional scale for the acceleration, T a < T. The models are compared with oceanographic data from drifting buoys, which satisfactorily approximate the motion of ideal particles in mesoscale turbulent fields. Model 2 appears to provide a satisfactory description of the second order particle statistics in the upper ocean. Model 3 appears to be applicable to deep ocean data with some questions still remaining open. Some examples of analytical calculations of dispersion using the models are shown for some simple oceanographie flows. The results indicate that the introduction of finite scales of turbulence plays an important role not only at initial times, t < T, but also for dispersion at longer times if the mean flow is strongly dependent on space and time, so that the scales of the mean flow and of the turbulence are of the same order. In these situations, which are characteristics of important current systems in the ocean, the advection-diffusion equation is not accurate, and the use of stochastic models such as 2 and 3 is especially indicated. Two different classes of applications for the models are reviewed: “direct” applications, where the models are directly integrated to compute dispersion, and “inverse” applications where the models are used to extract information about the velocity field from the Lagrangian data. A discussion is also provided on future applications of the models to study more general classes of oceanic flows including coherent structures.

[1]  S. Pope,et al.  Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  S. Naqvi,et al.  On the renewal of the denitrifying layer in the arabian sea , 1988 .

[3]  E. Krasnoff,et al.  The langevin model for turbulent diffusion , 1971 .

[4]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in turbulent flow , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  A. Verdière Lagrangian eddy statistics from surface drifters in the eastern North Atlantic , 1983 .

[6]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  Diffusion by Continuous Movements , 1922 .

[7]  A. Bower A Simple Kinematic Mechanism for Mixing Fluid Parcels across a Meandering Jet , 1991 .

[8]  S. Pope Lagrangian PDF Methods for Turbulent Flows , 1994 .

[9]  D. Thomson,et al.  Random walk modelling of diffusion in inhomogeneous turbulence , 1984 .

[10]  L. Janicke Particle Simulation of Inhomogeneous Turbulent Diffusion , 1983 .

[11]  Brian L. Sawford,et al.  Reynolds number effects in Lagrangian stochastic models of turbulent dispersion , 1991 .

[12]  Lagrangian diffusivity estimates from a gyre-scale numerical experiment on float tracking , 1989 .

[13]  Young,et al.  Statistics of ballistic agglomeration. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[14]  Annalisa Griffa,et al.  Effects of finite scales of turbulence on dispersion estimates , 1994 .

[15]  W. Krauss,et al.  Lagrangian properties of eddy fields in the northern North Atlantic as deduced from satellite-tracked buoys , 1987 .

[16]  D. Thomson Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Frans T. M. Nieuwstadt,et al.  Random walk models for particle displacements in inhomogeneous unsteady turbulent flows , 1985 .

[18]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  LAGRANGIAN OCEAN STUDIES , 1991 .

[19]  D. Olson,et al.  Influence of monsoonally-forced Ekman dynamics upon surface layer depth and plankton biomass distribution in the Arabian Sea , 1991 .

[20]  S. Chandrasekhar Stochastic problems in Physics and Astronomy , 1943 .

[21]  Donald B. Olson,et al.  Particle diffusion in a meandering jet , 1993 .

[22]  S. Riser,et al.  Quasi-Lagrangian structure and variability of the subtropical western North Atlantic circulation , 1983 .

[23]  D. Thomson,et al.  A random walk model of dispersion in turbulent flows and its application to dispersion in a valley , 1986 .

[24]  Russ E. Davis,et al.  Observing the general circulation with floats , 1991 .

[25]  G. Csanady Turbulent Diffusion in the Environment , 1973 .

[26]  P. Durbin Comments on papers by Wilson et al. (1981) and Legg and Raupach (1982) , 1984 .

[27]  D. Olson,et al.  Lagrangian statistics in the South Atlantic as derived from SOS and FGGE drifters , 1989 .

[28]  Philip L. Richardson,et al.  A census of eddies observed in North Atlantic SOFAR float data , 1993 .

[29]  R. Davis,et al.  Modeling eddy transport of passive tracers , 1987 .

[30]  M. Raupach,et al.  Markov-chain simulation of particle dispersion in inhomogeneous flows: The mean drift velocity induced by a gradient in Eulerian velocity variance , 1982 .

[31]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Lagrangian measurement of fluid-particle motion in an isotropic turbulent field , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  P. K. Kundu,et al.  Some Three-Dimensional Characteristics of Low-Frequency Current Fluctuations near the Oregon Coast , 1976 .

[33]  B. Rozovskii,et al.  Estimates of turbulence parameters from Lagrangian data using a stochastic particle model , 1995 .

[34]  G. Taylor Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.