Substitution and complementarity patterns between traditional transport means and car sharing: a person and trip level analysis

Car sharing is a new transport mode which combines characteristics of private and collective traditional transport means. Understanding the relationship of this mode with existing ones is very important for policy makers to create an efficient transport system and to properly address public resources. This paper aims to analyze the interaction of car sharing with the existing offer of competing modes, using data from a specific travel survey administered in the city of Turin, where both free-floating and one-way station based car sharing services are offered. All transport modes operating in the study area were considered. Bivariate models were estimated to study the propensity to have a car sharing subscription and the substitution patterns between different travel means for a representative random sample of trips taken by the Turin population. Results show that the current car sharing system is perceived as efficient and useful; car sharing members are young males, living in high-income and low-size household with, in particular, a high number of workers and low number of available cars; moreover, the presence of private parking near home has a strong negative impact. There is evidence that car sharing can substitute car driving trips, while the evidence that the same can happen with biking and walking trips is not supported by models but only marginally seen from descriptive statistics. There is also some complementarity between car sharing and public transport and a strong complementarity between car sharing and bike sharing, so that policy makers should jointly promote those modes.

[1]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members , 2015 .

[2]  John W. Polak,et al.  A new approach to predict the market and impacts of round-trip and point-to-point carsharing systems: Case study of London , 2014 .

[3]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  In free float: Developing Business Analytics support for carsharing providers , 2016 .

[4]  Francesco Ciari,et al.  Modeling Station-Based and Free-Floating Carsharing Demand , 2014 .

[5]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Modelling users' behaviour of a carsharing program: Application of a joint hazard and zero inflated dynamic ordered probability model , 2012 .

[6]  Regina R. Clewlow,et al.  Addressing the joint occurrence of self-selection and simultaneity biases in the estimation of program effects based on cross-sectional observational surveys: case study of travel behavior effects in carsharing , 2019 .

[7]  Marco Diana,et al.  From mode choice to modal diversion: A new behavioural paradigm and an application to the study of the demand for innovative transport services , 2010 .

[8]  Simone Weikl,et al.  Empirical analysis of free-floating carsharing usage: The Munich and Berlin case , 2015 .

[9]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Modeling free-floating car-sharing use in Switzerland: A spatial regression and conditional logit approach , 2017 .

[10]  Elliot W. Martin,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts of Carsharing in North America , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[11]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Carsharing and the Built Environment , 2009 .

[12]  Dimitrios Efthymiou,et al.  Modeling the propensity to join carsharing using hybrid choice models and mixed survey data , 2016 .

[13]  Aaron Golub,et al.  City CarShare , 2007 .

[14]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Carsharing’s Life-Cycle Impacts on Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2016 .

[15]  D. Ettema,et al.  Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being , 2010 .

[16]  Regina R. Clewlow Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area , 2016 .

[17]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Opportunities for and Impacts of Carsharing: A Survey of the Austin, Texas Market , 2011 .

[18]  Felipe F. Dias,et al.  A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services , 2017 .

[19]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Shared-Use Vehicle Systems: Framework for Classifying Carsharing, Station Cars, and Combined Approaches , 2002 .

[20]  Roberta Di Pace,et al.  Modelling users' behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach , 2015 .

[21]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Status Quo and Perspectives for CarSharing Systems: The Example of DriveNow , 2013 .

[22]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Choosing carpooling or carsharing as a mode: Swiss stated choice experiments , 2012 .

[23]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  Data Analytics in Free-Floating Carsharing: Evidence from the City of Berlin , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Colin Murphy,et al.  Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit , 2016 .

[25]  Regina R. Clewlow,et al.  Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States , 2017 .

[26]  Linda Steg,et al.  Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use , 2005 .

[27]  Marco Diana,et al.  Making the “primary utility of travel” concept operational: A measurement model for the assessment of the intrinsic utility of reported trips , 2008 .

[28]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  Synopsis of Users’ Behaviour of a Carsharing Program: A Case Study in Toronto , 2012 .

[29]  Elliot Martin,et al.  The Impact of Carsharing on Public Transit and Non-Motorized Travel: An Exploration of North American Carsharing Survey Data , 2011 .

[30]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Comparing Car-Sharing Schemes in Switzerland: User Groups and Usage Patterns , 2017 .

[31]  Elliot W. Martin,et al.  Impact of Carsharing on Household Vehicle Holdings , 2010 .

[32]  Claudia Nobis,et al.  Carsharing as Key Contribution to Multimodal and Sustainable Mobility Behavior: Carsharing in Germany , 2006 .

[33]  P. Waddell,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of vehicle sharing systems by young drivers , 2013 .

[34]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Modeling car-sharing membership as a mobility tool: A multivariate Probit approach with latent variables , 2017 .

[35]  U. Huwer Public transport and csar-sharing—benefits and effects of combined services , 2004 .

[36]  Gigi Cooper,et al.  The Missing Link: An Evaluation of CarSharing Portland Inc. Portland, Oregon , 2000 .

[37]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[38]  Nelson Chan,et al.  Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Facilitate the First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections , 2016 .

[39]  Marie-Hélène Vandersmissen,et al.  Modeling spatio-temporal diffusion of carsharing membership in Québec City , 2014 .

[40]  Bruno Agard,et al.  Car sharing system: what transaction datasets reveal on users' behaviors , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[41]  Regina R. Clewlow,et al.  The effect of carsharing on vehicle holdings and travel behavior: A propensity score and causal mediation analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area , 2015 .

[42]  Clayton Lane,et al.  PhillyCarShare : First-year social and mobility impacts of carsharing in philadelphia, pennsylvania , 2005 .

[43]  Teresa M Adams,et al.  Carsharing in a University Community , 2009 .

[44]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool , 2011 .