The contribution of the Clean Development Mechanism to national climate policies

The clean development mechanism (CDM), one of the flexible mechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol, has not received noticeable attention in the applied modeling literature. In this paper we develop a policy-oriented trading model explicitly including the key features likely to influence the supply and demand of CDM projects. This model allows us to evaluate the contribution of the CDM to climate policies at the national level. With an application to Belgium we show that the CDM could reduce the cost of the Kyoto Protocol by a factor 10. Policy analyses reveal that some features (e.g. the market share) have much more influence on this result than others (notably the transaction costs). Moreover, equilibrium effects can sometimes exceed direct effects so that, all in all, a larger domestic abatement could be justified by the desire to reduce what we call carbon dependence. Policy implications and perspectives for the CDM are discussed.

[1]  Russia at GHG Market , 2004 .

[2]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  A fiscal reform for increasing employment and mitigating CO2 emissions in Europe , 1995 .

[3]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Carbon Taxes and Joint Implementation , 2000 .

[4]  Harald Winkler,et al.  Baselines for Suppressed Demand: CDM Projects Contribution to Poverty Alleviation , 2002 .

[5]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism , 2005 .

[6]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Carbon Taxes and Joint Implementation. An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis for Germany and India , 2000 .

[7]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Meeting the Kyoto Targets: The Importance of Developing Country Participation , 2001 .

[8]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  Estimating the CDM market under the Marrakech Accords , 2002 .

[9]  H. Laurikka.  Absolute or relative baselines for JI/CDM projects in the energy sector? , 2002 .

[10]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Analysis of post-Kyoto CO₂ emissions trading using marginal abatement curves , 1998 .

[11]  J. Sager.  An Analysis with the CERT Model of the FSU Market Power in the Carbon Emissions Trading Market , 2003 .

[12]  Johan Eyckmans,et al.  Is Kyoto Fatally Flawed? An Analysis with Macgem , 2002 .

[13]  Kenneth M. Chomitz.  Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare? , 2002 .

[14]  J. Bollen,et al.  Clubs, Ceilings and CDM: Macroeconomics of Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol , 1999 .

[15]  H. Westskog,et al.  Should Developing Countries Take on Binding Commitments in a Climate Agreement? An Assessment of Gains and Uncertainty* , 2005 .

[16]  Haoran Pan,et al.  The cost efficiency of Kyoto flexible mechanisms: a top-down study with the GEM-E3 world model , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  A qualitative method to consider leakage effects from CDM and JI projects , 2002 .

[18]  Christopher Sutter,et al.  CDM projects under the Kyoto Protocol of the UNFCCC , 2003 .