Perimeter Control as an Alternative to Dedicated Bus Lanes: A Case Study

Dedicated bus lanes (DBLs) are a common traffic management strategy in cities as they improve the efficiency of the transit system by preventing buses from getting trapped in traffic jams. Nevertheless, DBLs also have certain disadvantages: they consume space, reduce available capacity for general traffic, and can thus lead to even more congested car traffic situations. It is appealing to find more efficient alternatives that maintain a sufficient network supply for general traffic while guaranteeing high commercial speeds for the bus system. This paper investigates whether perimeter control (gating) could be such an alternative to DBL strategies. This solution aims at controlling the traffic conditions of a given area by monitoring vehicle accumulations and adapting traffic signal parameters to reach the targeted conditions. If free-flow states can be maintained within the zone, then DBLs become superfluous. This hypothesis is examined through a simulation case study with an urban arterial acting as the targeted area. A dual-objective control approach was applied to allow for not only the vehicle accumulation inside the area but the queue lengths at its perimeter, thereby addressing one of the main issues associated with gating schemes. Due to the gating strategy, traffic performance in the arterial, measured through vehicle accumulation plus mean speed and density, improved significantly. Moreover, results showed that bus operations reach almost the same efficiency level when DBLs are replaced by perimeter control. Furthermore, the availability of an additional lane for general traffic in the control case significantly increased the arterial capacity for cars.

[1]  J. Dargay,et al.  Vehicle Ownership and Income Growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030 , 2007 .

[2]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Perimeter and boundary flow control in multi-reservoir heterogeneous networks , 2013 .

[3]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  Widening the scope for bus priority with intermittent bus lanes , 2001 .

[4]  L. Leclercq,et al.  A macroscopic theory for unsignalized intersections , 2007 .

[5]  Michael Eichler,et al.  Bus lanes with intermittent priority: Strategy formulae and an evaluation , 2006 .

[6]  H. B. Zhu.  Numerical study of urban traffic flow with dedicated bus lane and intermittent bus lane , 2010 .

[7]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Road Capacity and Travel Times with Bus Lanes and Intermittent Priority Activation , 2012 .

[8]  M J Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  P. I. Richards.  Shock Waves on the Highway , 1956 .

[10]  Jack Haddad,et al.  Robust perimeter control design for an urban region , 2014 .

[11]  Nicolas Chiabaut,et al.  Evaluation of a multimodal urban arterial: the passenger macroscopic fundamental diagram , 2015 .

[12]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Study on the number and location of measurement points for an MFD perimeter control scheme: a case study of Zurich , 2014, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[13]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Perimeter Traffic Control via Remote Feedback Gating , 2014 .

[14]  P. Rietveld,et al.  Coping with unreliability in public transport chains: a case study for The Netherlands , 2001 .

[15]  Kevin N. Balke,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Intelligent Bus Priority Concept , 2000 .

[16]  C. A. Guevara,et al.  Congestion pricing, transit subsidies and dedicated bus lanes: Efficient and practical solutions to congestion , 2011 .

[17]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  An analytical approximation for the macropscopic fundamental diagram of urban traffic , 2008 .

[18]  H. Urdal,et al.  An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities , 2013 .

[19]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Optimal Perimeter Control for Two Urban Regions With Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Model Predictive Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  Analytical formulation and empirical evaluation of pre-signals for bus priority , 2014 .

[21]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  The Lagrangian Coordinates and What it Means for First Order Traffic Flow Models , 2007 .

[22]  H. Oliver Gao,et al.  Optimal design of sustainable transit systems in congested urban networks: A macroscopic approach , 2017 .

[23]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Clustering Approach for Assessing the Travel Time Variability of Arterials , 2014 .

[24]  Jack Haddad.  Optimal perimeter control synthesis for two urban regions with aggregate boundary queue dynamics , 2017 .

[25]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Effect of Traffic Modeling on Control of Traffic Networks , 2016 .

[26]  S. Ilgin Guler,et al.  Analytical evaluation of flexible-sharing strategies on multimodal arterials , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[27]  Alexandre M. Bayen,et al.  Evaluation of traffic data obtained via GPS-enabled mobile phones: The Mobile Century field experiment , 2009 .

[28]  Monica Menendez,et al.  Two-level Perimeter Control Approach in a Connected-Vehicle Environment , 2016 .

[29]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Exploiting the fundamental diagram of urban networks for feedback-based gating , 2012 .

[30]  David Bretherton,et al.  EFFECTIVE URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL : RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SCOOT , 2003 .

[31]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Urban Gridlock: Macroscopic Modeling and Mitigation Approaches , 2007 .