Funneling and frustration in the energy landscapes of some designed and simplified proteins.

We explore the similarities and differences between the energy landscapes of proteins that have been selected by nature and those of some proteins designed by humans. Natural proteins have evolved to function as well as fold, and this is a source of energetic frustration. The sequence of Top7, on the other hand, was designed with architecture alone in mind using only native state stability as the optimization criterion. Its topology had not previously been observed in nature. Experimental studies show that the folding kinetics of Top7 is more complex than the kinetics of folding of otherwise comparable naturally occurring proteins. In this paper, we use structure prediction tools, frustration analysis, and free energy profiles to illustrate the folding landscapes of Top7 and two other proteins designed by Takada. We use both perfectly funneled (structure-based) and predictive (transferable) models to gain insight into the role of topological versus energetic frustration in these systems and show how they differ from those found for natural proteins. We also study how robust the folding of these designs would be to the simplification of the sequences using fewer amino acid types. Simplification using a five amino acid type code results in comparable quality of structure prediction to the full sequence in some cases, while the two-letter simplification scheme dramatically reduces the quality of structure prediction.

[1]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Native topology of the designed protein Top7 is not conducive to cooperative folding. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Adrian Gustavo Turjanski,et al.  Protein frustratometer: a tool to localize energetic frustration in protein molecules , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Robert T. Sauer,et al.  Cooperatively folded proteins in random sequence libraries , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[4]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[5]  D. Baker,et al.  Principles for designing ideal protein structures , 2012, Nature.

[6]  W. Jin,et al.  De novo design of foldable proteins with smooth folding funnel: automated negative design and experimental verification. , 2003, Structure.

[7]  P. Wolynes,et al.  On the role of frustration in the energy landscapes of allosteric proteins , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Prediction of native-state hydrogen exchange from perfectly funneled energy landscapes. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  STRIDE: a web server for secondary structure assignment from known atomic coordinates of proteins , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The experimental survey of protein-folding energy landscapes , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[11]  P. Wolynes.  Energy landscapes and solved protein–folding problems , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  A test of lattice protein folding algorithms. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Ellinor Haglund,et al.  Changes of Protein Folding Pathways by Circular Permutation , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding , 2003, Proteins.

[15]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Ke Fan,et al.  What is the minimum number of letters required to fold a protein? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  L. Björck,et al.  Solution structure of the albumin-binding GA module: a versatile bacterial protein domain. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  D. Baker,et al.  Functional rapidly folding proteins from simplified amino acid sequences , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Jun Wang,et al.  A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[21]  Mohammad M. Islam,et al.  Crystal structure of an extensively simplified variant of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in which over one-third of the residues are alanines , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  David Baker,et al.  Characterization of the folding energy landscapes of computer generated proteins suggests high folding free energy barriers and cooperativity may be consequences of natural selection. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[24]  Geoffrey J. Barton,et al.  JPred : a consensus secondary structure prediction server , 1999 .

[25]  Nicholas P. Schafer,et al.  AWSEM-MD: protein structure prediction using coarse-grained physical potentials and bioinformatically based local structure biasing. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[26]  Jun Wang,et al.  Reduction of protein sequence complexity by residue grouping. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[27]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[29]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Localizing frustration in native proteins and protein assemblies , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  K. Dill,et al.  An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Baker,et al.  The Highly Cooperative Folding of Small Naturally Occurring Proteins Is Likely the Result of Natural Selection , 2007, Cell.

[32]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Symmetry and the energy landscapes of biomolecules. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[35]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[36]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Role of water mediated interactions in protein-protein recognition landscapes. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[37]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[38]  Peter G. Wolynes,et al.  Role of explicitly cooperative interactions in protein folding funnels: A simulation study , 2001 .

[39]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  R. Levy,et al.  Simplified amino acid alphabets for protein fold recognition and implications for folding. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[41]  Peter G. Wolynes,et al.  Discrete Kinetic Models from Funneled Energy Landscape Simulations , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  Peter G. Wolynes,et al.  As simple as can be? , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  P S Kim,et al.  Folding of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) variants in which almost half the residues are alanine. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.