How much information do we need?

Modern technology is succeeding in delivering more information to people at ever faster rates. Under traditional views of rational decision making where individuals should evaluate and combine all available evidence, more information will yield better decisions. But our minds are designed to work in environments where information is often costly and difficult to obtain, leading us to use simple fast and frugal heuristics when making many decisions. These heuristics typically ignore most of the available information and rely on only a few important cues. Yet they make choices that are accurate in their appropriate application domains, achieving ecological rationality through their fit to particular information structures. This paper presents four classes of simple heuristics that use limited information—recognition-based heuristics, one-reason decision mechanisms, multiple-cue elimination strategies, and quick sequential search mechanisms—applied to environments from stock market investment to judging intentions of other organisms to choosing a mate. The findings that ecological rationality can be achieved with limited information are also used to indicate how our mind’s design, relying on decision mechanisms tuned to specific environments, should be taken into account in our technology’s design, creating environments that can enable better decisions.

[1]  P. Todd,et al.  Population-Wide Marriage Patterns Produced by Individual Mate-Search Heuristics , 2003 .

[2]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[3]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. , 1999 .

[4]  Thomas S. Ferguson,et al.  Who Solved the Secretary Problem , 1989 .

[5]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Categorization by elimination : Using few cues to choose , 1999 .

[6]  K. Dieussaert,et al.  Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2004 .

[7]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. , 2002, Psychological review.

[8]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Can ignorance beat the stock market , 1999 .

[9]  Ola Svenson,et al.  On decision rules and information processing strategies for choices among multiattribute alternatives , 1976 .

[10]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  New tools for decision analysts , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[11]  Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,et al.  Inevitable Illusions: How Mistakes of Reason Rule Our Minds , 1994 .

[12]  A. Bröder Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Manpreet Singh,et al.  Workshop Report , 2005, IPTPS.

[14]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart , 1999 .

[15]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Modeling Mate Choice in Monogamous Mating Systems with Courtship , 2002, Adapt. Behav..

[16]  D. Buss,et al.  The evolution of happiness. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[17]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  The use of recognition in group decision-making , 2004 .

[18]  Satoshi Kanazawa,et al.  Bowling with our imaginary friends , 2002 .

[19]  Age , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  Peter Carruthers,et al.  The Innate Mind: Cultural and Cognition , 2006 .

[21]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics for environmentally bounded minds , 2001 .

[22]  Thorsten Pachur,et al.  The Social Circle Heuristic: Fast and Frugal Decisions Based on Small Samples , 2005 .

[23]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Simple ways to construct search orders , 2005 .

[24]  Stefan Krauss,et al.  Ecological rationality and its contents , 2000 .

[25]  Ashish Nanda,et al.  Interactive Minds (A) , 1997 .

[26]  Iver Mysterud,et al.  Take the best , 2000 .

[27]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[28]  P. Todd,et al.  Explaining social learning of food preferences without aversions: an evolutionary simulation model of Norway rats , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Marco Janssen,et al.  Simulating Market Dynamics: Interactions between Consumer Psychology and Social Networks , 2003, Artificial Life.

[30]  Alastair J. Gill,et al.  In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the , 2004 .

[31]  B. Galef,et al.  Social influences on the identification of toxic foods by Norway rats , 1987 .

[32]  J. Henrich,et al.  The evolution of cultural evolution , 2003 .

[33]  Yale M. Braunstein,et al.  ECONOMIC SEARCH: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY , 1981 .

[34]  P. Todd,et al.  From pride and prejudice to persuasion : Satisficing in mate search , 1999 .

[35]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Becoming Famous Overnight: Limits on the Ability to Avoid Unconscious Influences of the Past , 1989 .

[36]  A. Bröder,et al.  Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  P M Todd,et al.  Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Manfred Kochen,et al.  On the economics of information , 1972, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[39]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[40]  P. Todd,et al.  Making Good Decisions with Minimal Information: Simultaneous and Sequential Choice , 2001 .

[41]  G. Carpenter,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 1999 .

[42]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How can we open up the adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[43]  S. Kalick,et al.  The Matching Hypothesis Reexamined , 1986 .

[44]  Benjamin Prud'homme,et al.  Monkey see, monkey do , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[45]  P. Slovic Risk-taking in children: Age and sex differences. , 1966 .

[46]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[47]  G. Gigerenzer Reckoning with Risk : Learning to Live with Uncertainty , 2002 .

[48]  P. Todd,et al.  How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .

[49]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Betting on one good reason : The Take the Best heuristic , 1999 .

[50]  Francesco C. Billari,et al.  Agent-Based Computational Demography , 2003 .

[51]  Mark Gluck,et al.  Memory and cognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  G. Gigerenzer Rationality : why social context matters , 1996 .

[53]  U. Staudinger,et al.  Interactive minds : life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition , 1996 .

[54]  P. Todd,et al.  Escaping the tyranny of choice: when fewer attributes make choice easier , 2007 .

[55]  D. Goldstein,et al.  How good are simple heuristics , 1999 .

[56]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Communicating Statistical Information , 2000, Science.

[57]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[58]  B. Fasolo,et al.  Decision technology. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  Huberman,et al.  Strong regularities in world wide web surfing , 1998, Science.

[60]  P. Todd,et al.  More Is Not Always Better: The Benefits of Cognitive Limits , 2003 .

[61]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[62]  B. Newell,et al.  Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  Ulrich Hoffrage,et al.  When do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell? , 1999 .

[64]  P. Todd,et al.  Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[65]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Demons versus heuristics in artificial intelligence, behavioral ecology, and economics , 1999 .

[66]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Stopping criteria in sequential choice , 1996 .

[67]  J. Rieskamp,et al.  SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[68]  Darryl A. Seale,et al.  Sequential Decision Making with Relative Ranks: An Experimental Investigation of the "Secretary Problem"> , 1997 .

[69]  L. Macchi,et al.  Thinking : psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making , 2005 .

[70]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[71]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[72]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[73]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Shaping Social Environments with Simple Recognition Heuristics , 2007 .

[74]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[75]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .