Life cycle design and prefabrication in buildings: A review and case studies in Hong Kong

Abstract Prefabrication has been increasingly used in buildings. It is recognised as a solution to reduce waste arising during design and construction phases. However, there is little emphasis on life cycle design issues for prefabricated buildings located in dense high-rise building environments. The purpose of this paper is to review the application and identify benefits and impediments of design for deconstruction and Industrialised, Flexible and Demountable building systems when applied to precast concrete construction. The paper presents the results of a comprehensive literature review, and two case studies of recently completed institutional buildings using prefabrication. The literature review shows that, so far, design for deconstruction is not a common practice in the building industry. The case studies showed some limitations such as the dense urban environment conditions and limited site area. The promotion of a closed-loop material cycle is critical to contribute to sustainability thus minimising CO2 emissions, natural resources consumption.

[1]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector , 2009 .

[2]  Muhammad Fauzi Mohd. Zain,et al.  Adaptable Industrial Building System: Construction Industry Perspective , 2012 .

[3]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction , 2007 .

[4]  Paola Sassi,et al.  Defining closed-loop material cycle construction , 2008 .

[5]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study , 2008 .

[6]  A. Sarja.  Open and Industrialised Building , 2003 .

[7]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Sustainable deconstruction of buildings , 2008 .

[8]  Andrew D.F. Price,et al.  Architect and contractor attitudes to waste minimisation , 2006 .

[9]  Ken Yeang.  Ecodesign: A Manual for Ecological Design , 2006 .

[10]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Sustainable Construction : Green Building Design and Delivery , 2005 .

[11]  Abdol R. Chini,et al.  DECONSTRUCTION AS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION , 2001 .

[12]  Stewart Brand,et al.  How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They're Built , 1997 .

[13]  Roger-Bruno Richard.  FOUR KEYBOARDS TO SUSTAINABLE MASS-CUSTOMIZATION IN ARCHITECTURE & CONSTRUCTION , 2007 .

[14]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Review of design and construction innovations in hong kong public housing , 2002 .

[15]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[16]  Stephen Kendall,et al.  Residential Open Building , 2000 .

[17]  C S Poon,et al.  Quantifying the waste reduction potential of using prefabrication in building construction in Hong Kong. , 2009, Waste management.

[18]  van Elc Emilia Egmond-de Wilde de Ligny,et al.  A study of the development of IFD building systems by using the Technological Trajectories Mapping Methodology , 2006 .

[19]  Philip Crowther.  Design for disassembly : an architectural strategy for sustainability , 2003 .

[20]  Kazuhiro Saitou,et al.  Design for Disassembly With High-Stiffness, Heat-Reversible Locator-Snap Systems , 2008 .

[21]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  Use of Prefabrication to Minimize Construction Waste - A Case Study Approach , 2005 .

[22]  Chi Sun Poon,et al.  Minimizing Construction and Demolition Waste at the Design Stage , 2002 .

[23]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning , 2007 .

[24]  C. Kibert.  Deconstruction: the start of a sustainable materials strategy for the built environment , 2003 .

[25]  van Fjm Frans Gassel.  Experiences with the design and production of an industrial, flexible and demountable (IFD) building system , 2002 .