Using a shared workspace and wireless laptops to improve collaborative project learning in an engineering design class

Two different technologies, groupware (a shared workspace) and shared wireless laptop computers, were implemented in a project design class in a civil engineering course. The research interest was in the way these technologies supported resource sharing within and across project groups and in the forms of group collaboration that resulted. The initiative was evaluated using both qualitative (e.g. pyramid discussion) and quantitative methods (e.g. survey, logs of usage). The results showed that these technologies helped improve group sharing of resources and supported different kinds of group collaboration. The shared workspace provided a location-independent central repository of resources around which group activities were coordinated whereas the laptops provided a focal point for the face-to-face discussion of these resources. The paper discusses the importance of embedding supportive technologies and the different forms of learner collaboration mediated by each technology.

[1]  John Cowan,et al.  On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher , 1998 .

[2]  Bertram C. Bruce.  Computers and the collaborative experience of learning , 1995 .

[3]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[4]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[5]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[6]  Klaas Sikkel,et al.  Using Shared Workspaces in Higher Education , 2000 .

[7]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works , 1998 .

[8]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[9]  J. Cowan.  On becoming an innovative university teacher : reflection in action , 1998 .

[10]  J. Underwood,et al.  Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[11]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[12]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Double-level languages and co-operative working , 2005, AI & SOCIETY.

[13]  Ann Walker,et al.  British Psychology Students' Perceptions of Group-Work and Peer Assessment , 2001 .

[14]  Linda A. Macaulay,et al.  Integrating groupware technology into the learning environment , 2001 .

[15]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Paradigm shifts and instructional technology : An introduction , 1996 .

[16]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Chapter 1 (Introduction) What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'? , 1999 .

[17]  Liz McDowell.  Electronic information resources in undergraduate education: an exploratory study of opportunities for student learning and independence , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[18]  David Hawkridge.  Innovations in Open and Distance Learning: Edited by Fred Lockwood and Anne Gooley. Kogan Page, London, 2001, 227pp, ISBN 0 7494 3476 7 , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Ron Omari,et al.  Using online technologies to support problem based learning: Learners' responses and perceptions , 1999 .

[21]  A. Burgen,et al.  Goals and purposes of higher education in the 21st century , 1996 .

[22]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Using Web-based support for campus-based open learning: lessons from a study in dental public health , 2002 .

[23]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving , 1995 .

[24]  Andrew Tolmie,et al.  Examining learning in relation to the contexts of use of ICT , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..