Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently emerged as a promising approach to enhance neurorehabilitative outcomes. However, little is known about how the local electrical field generated by tDCS relates to underlying neuroplastic changes and behavior. To address this question, we present a case study analysis of an individual with hemianopia due to stroke and who benefited from a combined visual rehabilitation training and tDCS treatment program. Activation associated with a visual motion perception task (obtained by functional magnetic resonance imaging; fMRI) was used to characterize local changes in brain activity at baseline and after training. Individualized, high-resolution electrical field modeling reproducing precise cerebral and lesioned tissue geometry, predicted distortions of current flow in peri-lesional areas and diffuse clusters of peak electric fields. Using changes in fMRI signal as an index of cortical recovery, correlations to the electrical field map were determined. Significant correlations between the electrical field and change in fMRI signal were region specific including cortical areas under the anode electrode and peri-lesional visual areas. These patterns were consistent with effective tDCS facilitated rehabilitation. We describe the methodology used to analyze tDCS mechanisms through combined fMRI and computational modeling with the ultimate goal of developing a rationale for individualized therapy.

[1]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2006, Bipolar disorders.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Bikson,et al.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of “return” electrode’s position and size , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[5]  W Paulus,et al.  Regional modulation of BOLD MRI responses to human sensorimotor activation by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Short-duration transcranial random noise stimulation induces blood oxygenation level dependent response attenuation in the human motor cortex , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Robust group analysis using outlier inference , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  G. Sartori,et al.  Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  A. Priori Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  S Marceglia,et al.  Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Bernhard A. Sabel,et al.  Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[14]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: High-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Priori,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression. , 2009, Journal of affective disorders.

[16]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[17]  R. Glassman Recovery following sensorimotor cortical damage: evoked potentials, brain stimulation and motor control. , 1971, Experimental neurology.

[18]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  C. Stinear,et al.  Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[20]  U. Eysel,et al.  Increased receptive field size in the surround of chronic lesions in the adult cat visual cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[22]  Sang Ho Ahn,et al.  Primary motor cortex activation by transcranial direct current stimulation in the human brain , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  Nadia Bolognini,et al.  Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. , 2008, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[25]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct stimulation and fluoxetine for the treatment of depression , 2008, European Psychiatry.

[28]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex , 2006, Brain Research Bulletin.

[29]  R. Sadleir,et al.  Predicted current densities in the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Mikael Persson,et al.  Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3-D impedance method , 2003, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[31]  Chang-Hwan Im,et al.  Determination of optimal electrode positions for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery , 2008, Expert review of medical devices.

[33]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[34]  P. Downing,et al.  Within‐subject reproducibility of category‐specific visual activation with functional MRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Timing-Dependent Modulation of Associative Plasticity by General Network Excitability in the Human Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Antal,et al.  Electrode-distance dependent after-effects of transcranial direct and random noise stimulation with extracephalic reference electrodes , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  S. Brandt,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[40]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[42]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients , 2010, Neurology.

[43]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  The influence of low-level transcortical DC-currents on response speed in humans. , 1981, The International journal of neuroscience.

[44]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Updates on the use of non-invasive brain stimulation in physical and rehabilitation medicine. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[46]  Mi Young Lee,et al.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: An fMRI study , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[47]  Volkmar Nicolas,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging mirrors recovery of visual perception after repetitive tachistoscopic stimulation in patients with partial cortical blindness , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  I. Gartside,et al.  Mechanisms of Sustained Increases of Firing Rate of Neurones in the Rat Cerebral Cortex after Polarization: Reverberating Circuits or Modification of Synaptic Conductance? , 1968, Nature.