4th International Conference on Ambulatory Monitoring of Physical Activity and Movement (Limerick, Ireland, 10–12 June 2015)

In 2015 the 4th International Conference on Ambulatory Monitoring of Physical Activity and Movement (ICAMPAM2015) (www.ismpb.org/limerick-2015/) was held at the University of Limerick, Ireland, hosted by the International Society for the Measurement of Physical Behaviours (ISMPB) (www.ismpb.org/), and Chaired by Professor Alan Donnelly. The conference attracted over 200 oral and poster presentations from delegates whose interests were in the measurement of physical behaviours including physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep. The conference series provides a catalyst for research, attracting attendees representing academic communities and commercial concerns from across Europe, North and South America, Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Australia and New Zealand. Following ICAMPAM2015 the ISMPB continues the relationship with Physiological Measurement in publishing selected full articles from conference submissions in a focus issue of the journal. Previous focus issues include those from ICAMPAM2011, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK (www.ismpb.org/glasgow-2011/) and ICAMPAM2013, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA (www.ismpb.org/history/2013-amherst/). For the ICAMPAM2015 focus issue the Guest Editors have selected articles covering the range of topics included at ICAMPAM2015. These articles represent the typical scope of content at an ICAMPAM conference; extending knowledge in the area of the measurement and characterisation of physical behaviours, whilst also exploring applications of this knowledge in health and disease: The automatic detection of sleep/waking time continues to be an important concern in fully characterising physical behaviour across 24 h periods (McVeigh et al 2016, Winkler et al 2016). Our developing understanding of the importance of sedentary behaviour was reflected in contributions to enhance detection and characterisation of this aspect of behaviour (Clarke-Cornwell et al 2016, Lerma et al 2016). Technological developments, especially the development of miniaturised wearable devices provide opportunities for enhanced data collection and a subsequent requirement for the demonstration of the validity and relevance of outcome measures. Within this focus issue the strength of contributions in this area to ICAMPAM2015 can be seen in a selection of articles (de Mullenheim et al 2016, Del Din et al 2016, Hislop et al 2016, Kheirkhahan et al 2016, Mackintosh et al 2016, Montoye et al 2016, Powell et al 2016, Rabuffetti et al 2016, Straczkiewicz et al 2016). Whilst accelerometry has been used extensively over many years to quantify human movement we now have the possibility to capture contextual information on physical behaviours using novel technologies (Loveday et al 2016). Thus new insight can inform and direct possible interventions to modify physical behaviour. The application of physical behaviour monitoring in the context of public health assessment and within clinical cohorts continues to provide invaluable insight into the impact of physical behaviour on health in B Stansfield et al

[1]  Ciprian M. Crainiceanu,et al.  Automatic car driving detection using raw accelerometry data , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[2]  M Rabuffetti,et al.  Differential actigraphy for monitoring asymmetry in upper limb motor activities , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[3]  A. Donnelly,et al.  The accuracy of the SenseWear Pro3 and the activPAL3 Micro devices for measurement of energy expenditure , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[4]  C. Matthews,et al.  Daily physical activity patterns from hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[5]  Malcolm H Granat,et al.  Empirically derived cut-points for sedentary behaviour: are we sitting differently? , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[6]  J. Hislop,et al.  Validity of wrist worn accelerometers and comparability between hip and wrist placement sites in estimating physical activity behaviour in preschool children , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[7]  J. Prioux,et al.  Accuracy of a low-cost global positioning system receiver for estimating grade during outdoor walking , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[8]  N. Owen,et al.  Identifying adults’ valid waking wear time by automated estimation in activPAL data collected with a 24 h wear protocol , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Alan Godfrey,et al.  Measuring gait with an accelerometer-based wearable: influence of device location, testing protocol and age , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[10]  G. Healy,et al.  Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Lauren B Sherar,et al.  Novel technology to help understand the context of physical activity and sedentary behaviour , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[12]  Karin A Pfeiffer,et al.  Wrist-independent energy expenditure prediction models from raw accelerometer data , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[13]  K. Khunti,et al.  Moderate to vigorous physical activity, not sedentary time, is associated with total and regional adiposity in a sample of UK adults at risk of type 2 diabetes , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[14]  Chi C Cho,et al.  Muscle activation and energy expenditure of sedentary behavior alternatives in young and old adults , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[15]  Sanjay Ranka,et al.  Actigraphy features for predicting mobility disability in older adults , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[16]  C. Dillon,et al.  Walking in hospital is associated with a shorter length of stay in older medical inpatients , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[17]  K A Mackintosh,et al.  Investigating optimal accelerometer placement for energy expenditure prediction in children using a machine learning approach , 2016, Physiological measurement.