Pedagogical Approaches for the 21st Century Student-Driven Learning in STEM Classrooms

The aim of this chapter is to present a conceptual and practical overview of a variety of innovative student-centered face-to-face and online pedagogical approaches for the 21st century classrooms including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classrooms. Various alternative innovative forms of small-group learning and online teaching/learning methods have been developed and implemented worldwide to replace or supplement the traditional lecture-based instruction. Online teaching/learning, cooperative learning, collaborative learning, problem-based learning, and teambased learning are examples of such innovative reform-based collaborative student driven pedagogies that are covered. We conclude that these innovative 21st strategies make learning in both physical and online classrooms more stimulating and motivating for students, which promote better retention of the course content, minimize dropout rates, and maximize students’ learning of the course content.

[1]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Goals and Strategies of a Problem-based Learning Facilitator , 2006 .

[2]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Students' experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving , 1995 .

[4]  Liguo Yu,et al.  Developing Soft Skills by Applying Problem-Based Learning in Software Engineering Education , 2016 .

[5]  David W. Johnson,et al.  An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning , 2009 .

[6]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[7]  Elizabeth Kocevar-Weidinger,et al.  Beyond active learning: a constructivist approach to learning , 2004 .

[8]  S. J. O’Connor,et al.  A comparison of classroom and online asynchronous problem-based learning for students undertaking statistics training as part of a Public Health Masters degree , 2012, Advances in Health Sciences Education.

[9]  Sema A. Kalaian,et al.  Small-Group vs. Competitive Learning in Computer Science Classrooms: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2015 .

[10]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Johannes Strobel,et al.  When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms , 2009 .

[12]  A Meta-Analytic Review of Studies of the Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Methods on Statistics Achievement , 2014 .

[13]  Sema A. Kalaian,et al.  Multilevel Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of Small-Group Learning Methods Compared to Lecture-Based Instruction in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics College Classrooms , 2014 .

[14]  H S Barrows,et al.  A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods , 1986, Medical education.

[15]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[16]  Heather Leary,et al.  A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels. , 2009 .

[17]  Patricia Cartney,et al.  The emotional impact of learning in small groups: highlighting the impact on student progression and retention , 2006 .

[18]  Xun Ge,et al.  Guest Editors’ introduction: Special issue on problem-based learning in health professions education: Toward advancement of problem-based learning research and practice in health professions education: Motivating learners, facilitating processes, and supporting with technology , 2015 .

[19]  Keng Siau,et al.  Understanding the values of mobile technology in education: a value-focused thinking approach , 2010, DATB.

[20]  D. T. Vernon,et al.  Does problem‐based learning work? A meta‐analysis of evaluative research , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  Hatice Ferhan Odabasi,et al.  Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Rafa M. Kasim,et al.  What Can Studies of Problem-Based Learning Tell Us? Synthesizing and Modeling PBL Effects on National Board of Medical Examination Performance: Hierarchical Linear Modeling Meta-Analytic Approach , 1999, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[23]  A. Neville.  Problem-Based Learning and Medical Education Forty Years On , 2008, Medical Principles and Practice.

[24]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[25]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[26]  Andrea Solimeno,et al.  The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Meltem Huri Baturay,et al.  The effects of problem-based learning on the classroom community perceptions and achievement of web-based education students , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[28]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. , 2012 .

[29]  Damien Hutchinson,et al.  Teaching Practices for Effective Cooperative Learning in an Online Learning Environment (OLE) , 2007, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[30]  John R. Savery,et al.  Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. , 2006 .

[31]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works , 1998 .