Required number of tokens to determine representative voice perturbation values.

Acoustic perturbation analyses of prolonged vowels are used in determining phonatory stability characteristics. When a number of tokens are analyzed, the average perturbation values create a stability profile of the voice. How many tokens are needed to obtain a representative perturbation value? In this study, five perturbation measures were considered, namely, jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio, coefficient of variation for amplitude, and coefficient of variation for frequency. Subject groups were chosen on the basis of individual average perturbation values. Results indicate that, except for the harmonics-to-noise ratio, generally, the less stable the voice, the greater is the number of tokens needed to obtain representative averages. For highly stable voices, at least six tokens are suggested: for voices with normal to high levels of instability, at least 15 tokens are recommended. Regardless of vocal stability, at least 10 tokens are suggested for the harmonics-to-noise ratio measure.

[1]  A G Askenfelt,et al.  Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  J H Saxman,et al.  A comparison of intrasubject variation across sessions of three vocal frequency perturbation indices. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  W S Winholtz,et al.  Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of children's voice , 1988 .

[5]  S. Linville,et al.  Fundamental frequency stability characteristics of elderly women's voices. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C. Simon,et al.  The variability of consecutive wavelengths in vocal and instrumental sounds. , 1926 .

[7]  I R Titze,et al.  Some technical considerations in voice perturbation measurements. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  T. Baer,et al.  Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  I R Titze,et al.  A model for neurologic sources of aperiodicity in vocal fold vibration. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Toward standards in acoustic analysis of voice , 1994 .

[11]  J Hillenbrand,et al.  A methodological study of perturbation and additive noise in synthetically generated voice signals. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  P. Lieberman Some Acoustic Measures of the Fundamental Periodicity of Normal and Pathologic Larynges , 1963 .

[13]  E T Doherty,et al.  Tape recorder effects on jitter and shimmer extraction. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Harry Hollien,et al.  A Method for Analyzing Vocal Jitter in Sustained Phonation. , 1973 .

[15]  I. Titze Parameterization of the glottal area, glottal flow, and vocal fold contact area. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  L. Ramig,et al.  Effects of physiological aging on selected acoustic characteristics of voice. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  I R Titze,et al.  Unification of perturbation measures in speech signals. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  I. Titze,et al.  Comparison of Fo extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  J F Deem,et al.  The automatic extraction of pitch perturbation using microcomputers: some methodological considerations. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  Ronald J. Baken,et al.  Clinical measurement of speech and voice , 1987 .

[21]  R J Baken,et al.  Consideration of the relationship between the fundamental frequency of phonation and vocal jitter. , 1990, Folia phoniatrica.

[22]  S. Linville Intraspeaker variability in fundamental frequency stability: an age-related phenomenon? , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Till,et al.  Time-shift, trial, and gender effects on vocal perturbation measures. , 1993, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[24]  M P Karnell,et al.  Comparison of acoustic voice perturbation measures among three independent voice laboratories. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  Y Horii,et al.  Vocal shimmer in sustained phonation. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  B. Kintz,et al.  Computational Handbook of Statistics , 1968 .

[27]  Ingo R. Titze,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of selected acoustic and glottographic measures for clinical phonatory function analysis , 1988 .

[28]  Y. Horii Jitter and shimmer differences among sustained vowel phonations. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  M P Karnell,et al.  Laryngeal perturbation analysis: minimum length of analysis window. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.