“Special Support” in Preschools in Sweden: Preschool staff’s definition of the construct

This study investigates the definitions of the construct “young children in need of special support” given by preschool staff in Sweden in 540 preschool units. The study has a mixed‐methods design based on qualitative analysis of an open‐ended question and quantitative analysis of questionnaire responses. The results reveal two general perspectives in definitions of the construct, a child perspective and an organisational perspective. Units with a child perspective had a higher proportion of children in need of special support, especially girls. The study highlights that the term “children in need of special support” is partially socially constructed and is partially based on perceived child characteristics. The perceptions of what is considered to be a child in need of special support held by staff in a unit may impact on the services provided to children in need of special support.

[1]  A. Sandberg,et al.  Children’s participation in preschool – on the conditions of the adults? Preschool staff’s concepts of children’s participation in preschool everyday life , 2010 .

[2]  M. Granlund,et al.  Preschool children in need of special support: prevalence of traditional disability categories and functional difficulties , 2009, Acta paediatrica.

[3]  A. Sandberg,et al.  The construct of social competence-how preschool teachers define social competence in young children , 2009 .

[4]  M. Mclaughlin,et al.  Disability Classification in Education: Issues and Perspectives , 2008 .

[5]  Lorraine E. Maxwell,et al.  Competency in Child Care Settings , 2007 .

[6]  K. Mccartney,et al.  Preschool Predictors of the Need for Early Remedial and Special Education Services , 2007, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  S. Riddell,et al.  Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Classification of Children With Disabilities , 2006 .

[8]  Rune J Simeonsson,et al.  Diagnosis to Function: Classification for Children and Youths , 2005, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[9]  K. Lane,et al.  Secondary Teachers' Views on Social Competence , 2004 .

[10]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[11]  J. Wright,et al.  A contextual analysis of externalizing and mixed syndrome boys: when syndromal similarity obscures functional dissimilarity. , 2001, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  R. Simeonsson,et al.  Students with disabilities: a national survey of participation in school activities , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Noell,et al.  A Construct Score Approach to the Assessment of Social Competence , 1992 .

[14]  Eva Björck-Åkesson.  Specialpedagogik i förskolan , 2009 .

[15]  E. Kozleski,et al.  Disproportionality in special education: a transatlantic phenomenon , 2008 .

[16]  C. Robson.  Students with disabilities, learning difficulties and disadvantages: statistics and indicators , 2005 .

[17]  M. Granlund,et al.  Early Intervention in Sweden : A Developmental Systems Perspective , 2004 .