Simulating the contribution of a biospecimen and clinical data repository in a phase II clinical trial: A value of information analysis

The potential contributions of a centralized data warehouse or repository in clinical research include the expedited accrual of subjects for phase II trials. Understanding the contribution of data warehouses that integrate clinical, biospecimen, and molecular data for the conduct of clinical trials is essential to inform private and public decisions on resource allocation and investment. We conducted a value of information analysis using data from recent trials at the Moffitt Cancer Center and simulated the potential reductions in trial size due to possible alternative scenarios of expedited accrual. In this study, we compared alternative data sets using a single model to assess value of information. Our findings suggest that the reductions in trial size range from 0% to 43%, depending on the amount of censoring in overall survival. The ability to expedite the accrual of patients for clinical trial studies using large data repositories that store data on inclusion/exclusion criteria and response to standard of care therapies demonstrated significant improvement in reducing the number of subjects needed to achieve similar end-results, as evaluated using value of information analysis with a limited number of parameters and a parsimonious model of overall survival.

[1]  V. Sondak,et al.  Phenotypic and functional analysis of dendritic cells and clinical outcome in patients with high-risk melanoma treated with adjuvant granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Susanne B Haga,et al.  Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research. , 2008, Advances in genetics.

[3]  Geoffrey S Ginsburg,et al.  Centralized biorepositories for genetic and genomic research. , 2008, JAMA.

[4]  J. Ghosh,et al.  Approximations and consistency of Bayes factors as model dimension grows , 2003 .

[5]  B. Druker,et al.  Translation of the Philadelphia chromosome into therapy for CML. , 2008, Blood.

[6]  H. Greely The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. , 2007, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[7]  C. Compton The Surgical Specimen Is the Personalized Part of Personalized Cancer Medicine , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  M. Nesline,et al.  Establishing a Cancer Center Data Bank and Biorepository for Multidisciplinary Research , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[9]  J. Pow-Sang,et al.  Phase II Trial of B7-1 (CD-86) Transduced, Cultured Autologous Tumor Cell Vaccine Plus Subcutaneous Interleukin-2 for Treatment of Stage IV Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2008, Journal of immunotherapy.

[10]  M. Fishman,et al.  Phase II trial of thalidomide and daily oral dexamethasone for treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer progressing after chemotherapy. , 2007, Urologic oncology.

[11]  G. Bepler,et al.  Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Chest.

[12]  G. Mills,et al.  Future of personalized medicine in oncology: a systems biology approach. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  G. Bepler,et al.  Phase II Study of First-Line Sequential Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine-Carboplatin Followed by Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2005, Oncology.

[14]  C. Compton Getting to personalized cancer medicine , 2007, Cancer.

[15]  J. Ross,et al.  The HER-2 receptor and breast cancer: ten years of targeted anti-HER-2 therapy and personalized medicine. , 2009, The oncologist.

[16]  Elisa Eiseman,et al.  Handbook of human tissue sources : a national resource of human tissue samples , 1999 .

[17]  Nicholas R. Anderson,et al.  Meeting the Governance Challenges of Next-Generation Biorepository Research , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[18]  Howard M. Proskin,et al.  Taking Out the Garbage , 2006 .

[19]  G. Bepler,et al.  Combination of p53 Cancer Vaccine with Chemotherapy in Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  P. Munster,et al.  Phase 2 study of gemcitabine and irinotecan in metastatic breast cancer with correlatives to determine topoisomerase I localization as a predictor of response , 2008, Cancer.

[21]  Alan Cantor,et al.  Feasibility and efficacy of molecular analysis-directed individualized therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Bryan R Luce,et al.  Rethinking Randomized Clinical Trials for Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Need for Transformational Change , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  C. Obasaju,et al.  Clinical Efficacy and Predictive Molecular Markers of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine and Pemetrexed in Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[24]  C. Moskaluk,et al.  Tissues from population-based cancer registries: a novel approach to increasing research potential. , 2005, Human pathology.

[25]  Eric B Haura,et al.  Phase 2 trial of docetaxel and gefitinib in the first‐line treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are 70 years of age or older , 2008, Cancer.

[26]  Helen M. Moore,et al.  2009 Biospecimen research network symposium: advancing cancer research through biospecimen science. , 2009, Cancer research.

[27]  S. Tunis,et al.  Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine? , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  S. Bates,et al.  Progress towards personalized medicine. , 2010, Drug discovery today.

[29]  V. Sondak,et al.  Phase II trial of sagopilone (ZK-EPO), a novel synthetic epothilone, with significant activity in metastatic melanoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.