Forest fuel mapping and evaluation of LANDFIRE fuel maps in Boulder County, Colorado, USA.

A key challenge in modern wildfire mitigation and forest management is accurate mapping of forest fuels in order to determine spatial fire hazard, plan mitigation efforts, and manage active fires. This study quantified forest fuels of the montane zone of Boulder County, CO, USA in an effort to aid wildfire mitigation planning and provide a metric by which LANDFIRE national fuel maps may be compared. Using data from 196 randomly stratified field plots, pre-existing vegetation maps, and derived variables, predictive classification and regression tree models were created for four fuel parameters necessary for spatial fire simulation with FARSITE (surface fuel model, canopy bulk density, canopy base height, and stand height). These predictive models accounted for 56–62% of the variability in forest fuels and produced fuel maps that predicted 91.4% and 88.2% of the burned area of two historic fires simulated in the FARSITE model. Simulations of areas burned based on LANDFIRE national fuel maps were less accurate, burning 77.7% and 40.3% of the historic fire areas. Our results indicate that fuel mapping efforts that utilize local area information and biotic as well as abiotic predictors will more accurately simulate fire spread rates and reflect the inherent variability of forested environments than do current LANDFIRE data products.

[1]  J. Marr,et al.  Ecosystems of the East Slope of the Front Range in Colorado. , 1962 .

[2]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Modeling the distribution of four vegetation alliances using generalized linear models and classification trees with spatial dependence , 2002 .

[3]  James K. Brown.  Handbook for inventorying downed woody material , 1974 .

[4]  Dylan Keon,et al.  Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load , 2002 .

[5]  A. Goetz,et al.  Assessing spatial patterns of forest fuel using AVIRIS data , 2006 .

[6]  Christopher D. Elvidge,et al.  Thermal infrared reflectance of dry plant materials: 2.5–20.0 μm , 1988 .

[7]  S. Ustin,et al.  Modeling airborne laser scanning data for the spatial generation of critical forest parameters in fire behavior modeling , 2003 .

[8]  I. Station,et al.  Research paper. INT , 1981 .

[9]  H. Anderson.  Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior , 1982 .

[10]  Jay R. Kost,et al.  Fuels Products of the LANDFIRE Project , 2006 .

[11]  T. T. Veblen,et al.  Fire, fuels and restoration of ponderosa pine–Douglas fir forests in the Rocky Mountains, USA , 2007 .

[12]  W. Romme,et al.  Expansion of the US wildland–urban interface , 2007 .

[13]  E. A. Brav.  Calculated risk. , 1977, Military medicine.

[14]  R. Platt,et al.  Are Wildfire Mitigation and Restoration of Historic Forest Structure Compatible? A Spatial Modeling Assessment , 2006 .

[15]  R. Peet,et al.  Succession: A population process , 1980, Vegetatio.

[16]  Margaret M. Moore,et al.  Southwestern Ponderosa Forest Structure: Changes Since Euro-American Settlement , 1994, Journal of Forestry.

[17]  R. Keane,et al.  MAPPING FUELS AND FIRE REGIMES USING REMOTE SENSING, ECOSYSTEM SIMULATION, AND GRADIENT MODELING , 2004 .

[18]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  WindWizard: A New Tool for Fire Management Decision Support , 2006 .

[19]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. , 1996 .

[20]  T. Swetnam,et al.  Warming and Earlier Spring Increase Western U.S. Forest Wildfire Activity , 2006, Science.

[21]  W. Romme,et al.  The Interaction of Fire, Fuels, and Climate across Rocky Mountain Forests , 2004 .

[22]  Robin M. Reich,et al.  Spatial models for estimating fuel loads in the Black Hills, South Dakota, USA , 2004 .

[23]  C. E. Van Wagner,et al.  Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire , 1977 .

[24]  Sonia A. Hall,et al.  Considerations for characterizing fuels as inputs for fire behavior models , 2006 .

[25]  P. Moran.  Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[26]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[27]  J. Franklin.  Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain‐derived variables , 1998 .

[28]  A. Ager.  ArcFuels : Forest Planning Tools for Managing Wildland Fuels , 2005 .

[29]  A. Chronopoulou-Sereli,et al.  Wildland Fire Danger Zoning – a Methodology , 1998 .

[30]  R. Peet.  Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range , 1981, Vegetatio.

[31]  W. Romme,et al.  Historical fire regimes in ponderosa pine forests of the Colorado Front Range, and recommendations for ecological restoration and fuels management , 2006 .

[32]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  The wildland-urban interface in the United States based on 125 million building locations. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  M. Finney.  FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[34]  E. Chuvieco,et al.  Application of remote sensing and geographic information systems to forest fire hazard mapping. , 1989 .

[35]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus Second edition , 1997 .

[36]  Fabio Maselli,et al.  Evaluation of forest fire risk by the analysis of environmental data and TM images , 1996 .

[37]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[38]  R. Keane,et al.  Mapping wildland fuels for fire management across multiple scales: Integrating remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical modeling , 2001 .