Investigating the sources of synoptic variability in atmospheric CO2 measurements over the Northern Hemisphere continents: a regional model study

Continuous measurements of atmospheric CO2 over the continents are potentially powerful tools for understanding regional carbon budgets, but our limited understanding of the processes driving the high-frequency variability in these measurements makes interpretation difficult. In this paper we examine the synoptic variability (⊼days) of surface CO2 concentrations in four continental records from Europe and North America. Three source functions corresponding to the ocean, land biosphere and anthropogenic sources and sinks for CO2 have been implemented in a regional atmospheric transport model. In previous carbon studies, monthly biospheric fluxes have typically been used, but here high spatiotemporal (daily, 1¼×1¼) resolution biospheric fluxes are obtained from the NCAR Land Surface Model (lsm). A high-pass filter is used to remove atmospheric variability on time scales longer than 2 months, and the resulting simulated concentration fields replicates reasonably well the magnitude and seasonality of the synoptic variability across the four observation sites. The phasing of many of the individual events are also captured, indicating that the physical and biogeochemical dynamics driving the model variability likely resemble those in nature.The observations and model results show pronounced summer maxima in the synoptic CO2 concentration variability at the two stations located in North America, while a slightly different seasonality with high variability throughout fall and winter is observed at the European sites. The mechanisms driving these patterns are studied and discussed based on correlations between the concentration anomalies and the driving atmospheric physical variables and surfaces fluxes in the simulations. During the summer, the synoptic variability over the continents has a significant contribution from variations in regional net primary production, which in turn is modulated by regional, synoptic temperature variability. In winter the synoptic variability is partitioned about equally between biospheric and anthropogenic CO2 and is mainly driven by local vertical mixing and synoptic variations in atmospheric circulation working on the large-scale atmospheric gradient. This study highlights the importance for future modeling work of improved high temporal resolution (at least daily) surface biosphere, oceanic and anthropogenic flux estimates as well as high vertical and horizontal spatiotemporal resolution of the driving meteorology.

[1]  Jorge L. Sarmiento,et al.  Optimal sampling of the atmosphere for purpose of inverse modeling: A model study , 2000 .

[2]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  The seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2: A study based on the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM2) , 1996 .

[3]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[4]  William J. Emery,et al.  Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography , 1998 .

[5]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of land CO2 fluxes estimated with remote sensing and analysis data over western Eurasia , 2002 .

[6]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[7]  J. Christensen The Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model : A three-dimensional air pollution model used for the Arctic , 1997 .

[8]  W. Ebisuzaki A Method to Estimate the Statistical Significance of a Correlation When the Data Are Serially Correlated , 1997 .

[9]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  An evaluation of neutral and convective planetary boundary-layer parameterizations relative to large eddy simulations , 1996 .

[10]  Keith W. Oleson,et al.  Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models , 2002 .

[11]  R. Rotty Estimates of seasonal variation in fossil fuel CO2 emissions , 1987 .

[12]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models through simulations of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2: First results of a model intercomparison study , 1998 .

[13]  Inez Y. Fung,et al.  Application of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer vegetation index to study atmosphere‐biosphere exchange of CO2 , 1987 .

[14]  Pieter P. Tans,et al.  Measurements of carbon dioxide on very tall towers: results of the NOAA/CMDL program , 1998 .

[15]  K. Higuchi,et al.  A Simulation of a Large Positive CO 2 Anomaly over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago , 1996 .

[16]  B. Bonan,et al.  A Land Surface Model (LSM Version 1.0) for Ecological, Hydrological, and Atmospheric Studies: Technical Description and User's Guide , 1996 .

[17]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[18]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Regional changes in carbon dioxide fluxes of land and oceans since 1980. , 2000, Science.

[19]  Gregg Marland,et al.  A 1° × 1° distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1950–1990 , 1996 .

[20]  K. Holmén,et al.  Anthropogenic and biogenic winter sources of Arctic CO2— a model study , 2001 .

[21]  Vemap Participants Vegetation/ecosystem modeling and analysis project: Comparing biogeography and biogeochemistry models in a continental-scale study of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change and CO2 doubling , 1995 .

[22]  Taro Takahashi,et al.  Net sea-air CO2 flux over the global oceans: An improved estimate based on the sea-air pCO2 difference , 1999 .

[23]  I. Enting,et al.  Using high temporal frequency data for CO2 inversions , 2002 .

[24]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Description of EDGAR Version 2.0: A set of global emission inventories of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances for all anthropogenic and most natural sources on a per country basis and on 1 degree x 1 degree grid , 1996 .

[25]  László Haszpra,et al.  On the representativeness of carbon dioxide measurements , 1999 .

[26]  P. Bakwin,et al.  What is the concentration footprint of a tall tower , 2001 .

[27]  Inez Y. Fung,et al.  Variations in modeled atmospheric transport of carbon dioxide and the consequences for CO2 inversions , 1996 .

[28]  D. Randall,et al.  Simulations of terrestrial carbon metabolism and atmospheric CO2 in a general circulation model: Part 2: Simulated CO2 concentrations , 1996 .

[29]  P. Rasch,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 simulated by the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: 1. Mean fields and seasonal cycles , 1998 .

[30]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Simulation of atmospheric CO2 over Europe and western Siberia using the regional scale model REMO , 2002 .

[31]  I. Levin,et al.  Long‐term observations of atmospheric CO2 and carbon isotopes at continental sites in Germany , 1995 .

[32]  S. Larsen,et al.  Modeling concentrations and fluxes of atmospheric CO2 in the North East Atlantic region , 2001 .

[33]  G. J. Collatz,et al.  Simulations of terrestrial carbon metabolism and atmospheric CO2 in a general circulation model. Part 1: Surface carbon fluxes , 1996 .

[34]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models with atmospheric CO2 measurements: Results from transient simulations considering increasing CO2, climate, and land‐use effects , 2002 .

[35]  R. Dargaville,et al.  Implications of interannual variability in atmospheric circulation on modeled CO2 concentrations and source estimates , 2000 .

[36]  R. Wanninkhof Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean , 1992 .

[37]  L. Haszpra Carbon dioxide concentration measurements at a rural site in Hungary , 1995 .

[38]  Taro Takahashi,et al.  Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models , 2002, Nature.

[39]  K. Wilson,et al.  A spectral analysis of biosphere-atmosphere trace gas flux densities and meteorological variables across hour to multi-year time scales , 2000 .

[40]  Summertime Siberian CO2 simulations with the regional transport model MATCH: a feasibility study of carbon uptake calculations from EUROSIB data , 2002 .