Endangered Cactus Restoration: Mitigating the Non‐Target Effects of a Biological Control Agent (Cactoblastis cactorum) in Florida
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. J. Simmonds,et al. Biological control ofOpuntia spp. byCactoblastis cactorum in the Leeward Islands (West Indies) , 1966, Entomophaga.
[2] P. Stiling. Potential Non-target Effects of a Biological Control Agent, Prickly Pear Moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in North America, and Possible Management Actions , 2002, Biological Invasions.
[3] S. Louda,et al. Indirect versus direct effects of grasses on growth of a cactus (Opuntia fragilis): insect herbivory versus competition , 1994, Oecologia.
[4] S. Hight,et al. EXPANDING GEOGRAPHICAL RANGE OF CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE) IN NORTH AMERICA , 2002 .
[5] Steven W. Woodmansee,et al. A SIGNIFICANT NEW POPULATION OF THE RARE SEMAPHORE PRICKLYPEAR CACTUS, OPUNTIA CORALLICOLA (CACTACEAE) , 2002 .
[6] Jorge Soberón,et al. The Importance of Opuntia in Mexico and Routes of Invasion and Impact of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) , 2001 .
[7] J Memmott,et al. Infiltration of a Hawaiian Community by Introduced Biological Control Agents , 2001, Science.
[8] S. J.,et al. THE IMPORTANCE OF OPUNTIA IN MEXICO AND ROUTES OF INVASION AND IMPACT OF CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM ( LEPIDOPTERA : PYRALIDAE ) , 2001 .
[9] J. Elkinton,et al. Effects of a Biological Control Introduction on Three Nontarget Native Species of Saturniid Moths , 2000, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[10] B. A. Hawkins,et al. Non-target Effects of Biological Control , 2000 .
[11] J. Hoffmann,et al. The renowned cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum: its natural history and threat to native Opuntia floras in Mexico and the United States of America , 2000 .
[12] L. Ruggiero,et al. Non-target effects of an introduced biological control agent on deer mouse ecology , 2000, Oecologia.
[13] F. Howarth. Non-target Effects of Biological Control Agents , 2000 .
[14] V. Negrón-Ortíz. Reproductive biology of a rare cactus, Opuntia spinosissima (Cactaceae), in the Florida Keys: why is seed set very low? , 1998, Sexual Plant Reproduction.
[15] Derek M. Johnson,et al. DISTRIBUTION AND DISPERSAL OF CACTOBLASTIS CACTORUM (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE), AN EXOTIC OPUNTIA-FEEDING MOTH, IN FLORIDA , 1998 .
[16] Daniel Simberloff,et al. Ecological Effects of an Insect Introduced for the Biological Control of Weeds , 1997 .
[17] Daniel Simberloff,et al. How Risky is Biological Control , 1996 .
[18] Derek M. Johnson,et al. Host specificity of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an exotic Opuntia-feeding moth, in Florida , 1996 .
[19] D. Onstad,et al. Risks of Host Range Expansion by Parasites of Insects Population ecology can help us estimate the risks that biological control agents pose to nontarget species , 1996 .
[20] R. Pemberton. Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the United States: An Immigrant Biological Control Agent or an Introduction of the Nursery Industry? , 1995 .
[21] D. Simberloff,et al. Conservation of pristine habitats and unintended effects of biological control. , 1992 .
[22] J. Linsley. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL I , 1991 .
[23] P. Stiling. Calculating the establishment rates of parasitoids in classical biological control. , 1990 .
[24] Joshua Lederberg,et al. Letter from Joshua Lederberg to John H. Gibbons, United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment , 1986 .
[25] H. Hokkanen,et al. Success in classical biological control , 1985 .
[26] F. Slansky,et al. THE NUTRITIONAL ECOLOGY OF IMMATURE INSECTS , 1981 .
[27] C. Clausen,et al. Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds : a world review , 1978 .
[28] A. P. Dodd. The biological campaign against prickly-pear , 1940 .