Fundamental characteristics of decentralized separation control in a high density air corridor are discussed. A high density air corridor is expected to be an air space where aircraft capable of airborne self-separation are allowed to fly into the same direction. Some decentralized control algorithms are indispensable for its operational safety and a large traffic throughput. In this study two types of self-separation algorithms are investigated through numerical simulations: one is based on the relative velocity vector, and the other is based on the lateral position. The former algorithm is developed based on the free-flight algorithm, and the latter one is based on the assumption that all aircraft intends flying along the corridor. It is clarified that the velocity vector based algorithm leads many aircraft to perform superfluous maneuvers into lateral direction, which results in far larger conflict risk and operational inefficiency than those obtained by the lateral position based algorithm that achieved conflict free operation with high throughput throughout the all numerical simulations. It is concluded that a selfseparation algorithm for a free-flight should not be directly applied for a high density air corridor operation because this algorithm cannot achieve sufficient self-separation during overtaking. Through numerical investigations it is proven that the flight intent has a significant role, and that the lateral position based algorithm has a strong capability to achieve safe and efficient operation of a self-separated high density corridor.
[1]
Terence S. Abbott.
Speed Control Law for Precision Terminal Area In-Trail Self Spacing
,
2002
.
[2]
Arash Yousefi,et al.
Nextgen flow corridors initial design, procedures, and display functionalities
,
2010,
29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
[3]
Min Xue,et al.
Design Analysis of Corridors-in-the-Sky
,
2009
.
[4]
Yoichi Nakamura,et al.
Decentralized Control of an Unidirectional Air Traffic Flow with Flight Speed Distribution
,
2012
.
[5]
Yoichi Nakamura,et al.
Unidirectional Air Traffic Flow Control Using Airborne Surveillance
,
2011
.
[6]
Dan Ivanescu,et al.
PROPAGATION OF AIRBORNE SPACING ERRORS IN MERGING TRAFFIC STREAMS
,
2007
.
[7]
Arash Yousefi,et al.
Dynamic allocation and benefit assessment of NextGen flow corridors
,
2013
.
[8]
Lesley A. Weitz.
Investigating string stability of a time-history control law for Interval Management
,
2013
.
[9]
Bryan E. Barmore,et al.
Simulation Results for Airborne Precision Spacing along Continuous Descent Arrivals
,
2008
.