Pathology Laboratory Surveillance in the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Blood-Borne Viruses: Protocol for a Cohort Study

Background Passive surveillance is the principal method of sexually transmitted infection (STI) and blood-borne virus (BBV) surveillance in Australia whereby positive cases of select STIs and BBVs are notified to the state and territory health departments. A major limitation of passive surveillance is that it only collects information on positive cases and notifications are heavily dependent on testing patterns. Denominator testing data are important in the interpretation of notifications. Objective The aim of this study is to establish a national pathology laboratory surveillance system, part of a larger national sentinel surveillance system called ACCESS (the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance). ACCESS is designed to utilize denominator testing data to understand trends in case reporting and monitor the uptake and outcomes of testing for STIs and BBVs. Methods ACCESS involves a range of clinical sites and pathology laboratories, each with a separate method of recruitment, data extraction, and data processing. This paper includes pathology laboratory sites only. First established in 2007 for chlamydia only, ACCESS expanded in 2012 to capture all diagnostic and clinical monitoring tests for STIs and BBVs, initially from pathology laboratories in New South Wales and Victoria, Australia, to at least one public and one private pathology laboratory in all Australian states and territories in 2016. The pathology laboratory sentinel surveillance system incorporates a longitudinal cohort design whereby all diagnostic and clinical monitoring tests for STIs and BBVs are collated from participating pathology laboratories in a line-listed format. An anonymous, unique identifier will be created to link patient data within and between participating pathology laboratory databases and to clinical services databases. Using electronically extracted, line-listed data, several indicators for each STI and BBV can be calculated, including the number of tests, unique number of individuals tested and retested, test yield, positivity, and incidence. Results To date, over 20 million STI and BBV laboratory test records have been extracted for analysis for surveillance monitoring nationally. Recruitment of laboratories is ongoing to ensure appropriate coverage for each state and territory; reporting of indicators will occur in 2019 with publication to follow. Conclusions The ACCESS pathology laboratory sentinel surveillance network is a unique surveillance system that collects data on diagnostic testing, management, and care for and of STIs and BBVs. It complements the ACCESS clinical network and enhances Australia’s capacity to respond to STIs and BBVs. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/13625

[1]  R. Guy,et al.  Monitoring the Control of Sexually Transmissible Infections and Blood-Borne Viruses: Protocol for the Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance (ACCESS) , 2018, JMIR research protocols.

[2]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Anorectal swabs as a marker of male-to-male sexual exposure in STI surveillance systems , 2017, Epidemiology and Infection.

[3]  H. Wisplinghoff,et al.  Establishment of a voluntary electronic Chlamydia trachomatis laboratory surveillance system in Germany, 2008 to 2014 , 2017, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[4]  M. Hellard,et al.  Characteristics of gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men testing and retesting at Australia's first shop-front rapid point-of-care HIV testing service. , 2016, Sexual health.

[5]  R. Guy,et al.  Analysis of laboratory testing results collected in an enhanced chlamydia surveillance system in Australia, 2008–2010 , 2014, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[6]  S. Hutchinson,et al.  Use of laboratory-based surveillance data to estimate the number of people chronically infected with hepatitis B living in Scotland , 2013, Epidemiology and Infection.

[7]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Are Australian sexual health clinics attracting priority populations? , 2013, Sexual health.

[8]  J. Wit,et al.  HIV/AIDS, hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: annual report of trends in behaviour 2013 , 2013 .

[9]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Understanding trends in genital Chlamydia trachomatis can benefit from enhanced surveillance: findings from Australia , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[10]  R. Guy,et al.  Missed opportunities—low levels of chlamydia retesting at Australian general practices, 2008–2009 , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[11]  P. Klapper,et al.  Using automated extraction of hepatitis B tests for surveillance: evidence of decreasing incidence of acute hepatitis B in England , 2011, Epidemiology and Infection.

[12]  C. Jennison,et al.  Surveillance of community genital Chlamydia trachomatis testing in the East of England, 2008-2010. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[13]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Re-testing for chlamydia at sexual health services in Australia, 2004-08. , 2011, Sexual health.

[14]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Chlamydia Trends in Men Who Have Sex With Men Attending Sexual Health Services in Australia, 2004–2008 , 2011, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[15]  R. Guy,et al.  Establishing a linked sentinel surveillance system for blood-borne viruses and sexually transmissible infections: methods, system attributes and early findings. , 2010, Sexual health.

[16]  J. Hocking,et al.  Evidence for the effectiveness of a chlamydia awareness campaign: increased population rates of chlamydia testing and detection , 2007, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[17]  L. Finelli,et al.  Surveillance Programs for Chronic Viral Hepatitis in Three Health Departments , 2006, Public health reports.

[18]  C. Fairley,et al.  Nowhere near the point of diminishing returns: correlations between chlamydia testing and notification rates in New South Wales , 2005, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[19]  K. Fenton,et al.  Surveillance systems for STIs in the European Union: facing a changing epidemiology , 2004, Sexually Transmitted Infections.