Comparison Between MCFC/Gas Turbine and MCFC/Steam Turbine Combined Power Plants

Worldwide, the main power source to produce electric energy is represented by fossil fuels, principally used at the present time in large combustion power plants. The main environmental impacts of fossil fuel-fired power plants are the use of non-renewable resources and pollutants emissions. An improvement in electric efficiency would yield a reduction in emissions and resources depletion. In fact, if efficiency is raised, in order to produce an amount unit of electric energy, less fuel is required and consequently less pollutants are released. Moreover, higher efficiency leads to economic savings in operating costs. A generally accepted way of improving efficiency is to combine power plants’ cycles. If one of the combined plants is represented by a fuel cell, both thermodynamic efficiency and emissions level are improved. Fuel cells, in fact, are ultra-clean high efficiency energy conversion devices because no combustion occurs in energy production, but only electrochemical reactions and consequently no NOx and CO are produced inside the cell. Moreover, the final product of the reaction is water that can be released into the atmosphere without particular problems. Second generation fuel cells (Solid Oxide FC and Molten Carbonate FC) are particularly suitable for combining cycles, due to their high operating temperature. In previous works, the authors had analyzed the possibility of combining Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) plant with a Gas Turbine and then a MCFC with a Steam Turbine Plant. Results obtained show that both these configurations allow to obtain high conversion efficiencies and reduced emissions. In the present work, a comparison between MCFC-Gas Turbine and MCFC-Steam Turbine is conducted in order to evaluate the main advantages and disadvantages in adopting one solution instead of the other one.Copyright © 2003 by ASME