Is a Profile Worth a Thousand Words? How Online Support-Seeker’s Profile Features May Influence the Quality of Received Support Messages

Although there is an increasing amount of research on support-seeking in cyberspace, very little is known about what features of online support-seeking can enhance the quality of received support. The present experiment examined how support-seekers’ use of cues to personal identity in their user profile can influence the level of person-centeredness and politeness in others’ responses to their support-seeking postings. Results showed that support-seekers whose user profile contained a portrait picture and a first name ID tended to receive higher person-centered and more polite support messages than support-seekers whose user profile did not contain those cues to personal identity.

[1]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Crafting Supportive Communication Online: A Communication Design Analysis of Conflict in an Online Support Group , 2010 .

[2]  Suzanne Pingree,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Predictors of Participation in a Computer Support Group for Women With Breast Cancer , 2006, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[3]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[4]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[5]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[6]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Cues to Identity in Online Dyads: Effects of Interpersonal Versus Intragroup Perceptions on Performance , 2008 .

[7]  Hugo Liu,et al.  Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Laramie D. Taylor,et al.  Avatars and Emotional Engagement in Asynchronous Online Communication , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  James L. Applegate.  Adaptive Communication in Educational Contexts: A Study of Teachers' Communicative Strategies. , 1980 .

[10]  Aine Horgan,et al.  An evaluation of an online peer support forum for university students with depressive symptoms. , 2013, Archives of psychiatric nursing.

[11]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[12]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[13]  Sara Rubinelli,et al.  Coping With Chronic Lower Back Pain: Designing and Testing the Online Tool ONESELF , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[15]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Are Norms of Disclosure of Online and Offline Personal Information Associated with the Disclosure of Personal Information Online , 2010 .

[16]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication , 2005 .

[17]  Kathleen M Griffiths,et al.  Systematic Review on Internet Support Groups (ISGs) and Depression (1): Do ISGs Reduce Depressive Symptoms? , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Human Communication Research Issn 0360-3989 a Meta-analysis of Research on Formal Computer-mediated Support Groups: Examining Group Characteristics and Health Outcomes , 2022 .

[19]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[20]  Bo Xie,et al.  Multimodal Computer-Mediated Communication and Social Support among Older Chinese Internet Users , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI , 1999 .

[22]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Empowering Processes and Outcomes of Participation in Online Support Groups for Patients With Breast Cancer, Arthritis, or Fibromyalgia , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[23]  Susanne Jones,et al.  Putting the Person into Person-Centered and Immediate Emotional Support , 2004, Commun. Res..

[24]  Martin Tanis.  Online social support groups , 2009 .

[25]  Judith Donath,et al.  Identity and deception in the virtual community , 1998 .

[26]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Yangjoo Park,et al.  Being polite while fulfilling different discourse functions in online classroom discussions , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Michael Gilding,et al.  ‘I’ve Never Clicked this Much with Anyone in My Life’: Trust and Hyperpersonal Communication in Online Friendships , 2004, New Media Soc..

[29]  Brant R. Burleson,et al.  The Development of Comforting Communication Skills in Childhood and Adolescence. , 1982 .

[30]  T. Postmes,et al.  Short Communication A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour , 2005 .

[31]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context , 2003 .

[32]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[33]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[35]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-Service environments , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[36]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond Hearing : Where Real-World and Online Support Meet , 2002 .

[37]  Exploring electronic support groups. , 1992 .

[38]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Computer-mediated communication on the internet , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  James Price Dillard,et al.  A Review and Meta-Analysis of Person-Centered Messages and Social Support Outcomes , 2012 .

[41]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[42]  Hans van Buuren,et al.  Determining Sociability, Social Space, and Social Presence in (A)synchronous Collaborative Groups , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[43]  Azy Barak,et al.  Factors Related to Perceived Helpfulness in Supporting Highly Distressed Individuals through an Online Support Chat , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[44]  Wonshik Chee,et al.  The Use of Internet Cancer Support Groups by Ethnic Minorities , 2008, Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society.

[45]  John Suler,et al.  Fostering empowerment in online support groups , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Phillip R. Morrow,et al.  Telling about problems and giving advice in an Internet discussion forum: some discourse features , 2006 .

[47]  D. Rutter,et al.  Looking and Seeing: The Role of Visual Communication in Social Interaction , 1984 .

[48]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  Uncertainty and information exchange in developing relationships. , 1988 .

[49]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[50]  Erina L. MacGeorge,et al.  Understanding Advice in Supportive Interactions: Beyond the Facework and Message Evaluation Paradigm. , 2004 .

[51]  M. T. Høybye,et al.  Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an internet breast cancer support group , 2005, Psycho-oncology.

[52]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[53]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Social support: Mapping the construct , 2009 .

[54]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet use and social support in women with breast cancer. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[55]  M ChristophersonKimberly.  The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions , 2007 .

[56]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[57]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[58]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[59]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF TRUST AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SELF‐DISCLOSURE , 1977 .

[60]  C. V. van Uden-Kraan,et al.  Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients' empowerment. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[61]  C. Schetter,et al.  The Effectiveness of Social Support Attempts in Intimate Relationships , 2010 .

[62]  Paul Skalski,et al.  The Role of Social Presence in Interactive Agent-Based Persuasion , 2007 .

[63]  C. Nass,et al.  Social-Psychological Origins of Feelings of Presence: Creating Social Presence With Machine-Generated Voices , 2005 .

[64]  Erina L. MacGeorge,et al.  Support providers' interaction goals: the influence of attributions and emotions , 2001 .

[65]  A. Winzelberg.  The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders , 1997 .

[66]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[67]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Not So Imaginary Interpersonal Contact With Public Figures on Social Network Sites , 2013, Commun. Res..

[68]  Alexander P. Schouten,et al.  The Effects of Other-Generated and System-Generated Cues on Adolescents' Perceived Attractiveness on Social Network Sites , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[69]  Exploring electronic support groups. , 1992, The American journal of nursing.

[70]  Kimberly M. Christopherson.  The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: "On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog" , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[71]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[72]  Neil S. Coulson,et al.  Receiving Social Support Online: An Analysis of a Computer-Mediated Support Group for Individuals Living with Irritable Bowel Syndrome , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[73]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  B. Burleson.  The Production of Comforting Messages: Social-Cognitive Foundations , 1985 .

[75]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication? , 2006, Commun. Res..

[76]  P. Huguet,et al.  Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[77]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[78]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. , 2008, Journal of adolescence.

[79]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Beyond hearing: Where the real-world and online support meet. , 2002 .

[80]  Cynthia M. H. Bane,et al.  Social Support as a Moderator of the Big‐Fish‐in‐a‐Little‐Pond Effect in Online Self‐Help Support Groups1 , 2007 .

[81]  Fiona McTavish,et al.  From Diagnosis to Death: A Case Study of Coping With Breast Cancer as Seen Through Online Discussion Group Messages , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[82]  L. Hosmer.  TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .